Crimson King
Full Member
- Joined
- May 11, 2013
- Messages
- 4,033
People will have their opinions but he's a better signing for them than Kane, imo. I'd much rather they have gone all in on that transfer.
I've rated Grealish for a long time and I'd be willing to bet his numbers shoot right up at City. In a years time people will be talking about him the way they do about De Bruyne. All that's changed will be that he plays with better players that finish chances, has more possession, and plays in Europe.
As you can probably tell I'm pretty annoyed. I know Sancho can play Rw but having watched them both a lot, Grealish was the one I wanted. I thought we were priced out at £120m+, but £100m isn't that much more than what we payed for Sancho. Sigh. Hoping Sancho tears it up and Grealish's injuries take a leaf out of De Bryune's book.
It's nearly £30m more, for an older player, who's favoured positions we're already stacked in.
We've signed the players we needed so far, no point in getting upset when our rivals splash out as well.