Zen86
Full Member
Bad move for both parties. Nothing to cry about.
Wum of a month surely.Proof that Man Utd is becoming more and more irrelevant with each passing transfer window. Top English players don't want to join anymore. City or Chelsea it is.
Doubt we were even in for him this summer.Proof that Man Utd is becoming more and more irrelevant with each passing transfer window. Top English players don't want to join anymore. City or Chelsea it is.
Proof that Man Utd is becoming more and more irrelevant with each passing transfer window. Top English players don't want to join anymore. City or Chelsea it is.
I think he's a top player but still massively overrated. Spoken of as the 2nd coming of George Best or something.
Proof that Man Utd is becoming more and more irrelevant with each passing transfer window. Top English players don't want to join anymore. City or Chelsea it is.
really couldn’t careless about this one tbh.
yes Grealish is a good player but he isn’t any better than what they’ve got at the moment.
WTF are they smoking over at City? Imagine how much they'll pay Kane a week ontop of his transfer fee now
do you reckon they will sign kane?
I agree. You can only have 11 players on the pitch. If he plays then sterling or mahrez or de brunye or silva or torres or foden wont so it doesnt add much to the overall picture other than that you can put out a world class second 11 for an fa cup 3rd round tie at scunthorpe.
its no real achievement to build a squad of two £50m+ Players In each position and win stuff.
do you reckon they will sign kane?
Well ofcourse. Kane hadnt wrecked his relationship with his club if he werent sure City would sign him.
Nah even give them Kane and let Lukaku go to Chelsea. Give us a clear run at Haaland. Grealish and Kane in their front 3 would have no pace in it and no threat in behind.yes thats exactly my point, i don’t think Grealish is as good as any of those you’ve mentioned.
if they’d have signed Kane then I’d have been worried as he fits what they need much more but Grealish? I really don’t care.
I dunno, I did think Grealish was Pep's consolation prize from his board for not delivering Kane (because surely no club is going to spend 250m on just 2 players in 1 window) but that was before Kane decided to be a prick now I'm 50/50
For me it's not about that. It's about the fact that last year we could have had him, and that he was a player that genuinely would have preferred us but had no "option" but to make this move.really couldn’t careless about this one tbh.
yes Grealish is a good player but he isn’t any better than what they’ve got at the moment.
Find this quite a strange video for him to come out and state candidly the fee and release clause etc.
That's absolutely insane for a club who can't even fill up their own stadium.
he isnt, and if you asked city fans 6 months ago, theyd have said the same.I’ve long been a Grealish fan but I’m not sure if he’s that much better than Bernardo Silva if at all.
WTF are they smoking over at City? Imagine how much they'll pay Kane a week ontop of his transfer fee now
AgreedQuite envious of this one, he would’ve been a crowd favourite with us and you can just tell that he has all the qualities needed of a United player whilst seemingly loving the club.
Think he’ll do well at City, happy for him in a way just gutted it’s City he’s gone to. Like I said quite envious but this is life and unfortunately the timing wasn’t there.