So Ban Ki-Moon and Kofi Annan both think the UN is biased against Israel. That makes it two opinions. Pretty important opinions on the matter too.
Even if I agree, the UN has an agenda against Israel, the number of civilian deaths are from multiple sources. Everyone must have an agenda against Israel then??
I mean, why would a pro- Palestine or an anti- Israel U.N let this war go so far. If they are so Biased, they could have taken actions against Israel, can they not?? And as Kaos said, Israel's agenda is backed up by U.S which gives them a significant leverage.
I think if it wasn't for Religion it would be something else though Fearless. My cow is not as fat as your cow now you must die etc. Human nature sucks.
The displaced Palestinians were aggrieved because the Arab Nations intent on wiping Israel out in 1948 promised victory, yet when they were beaten refused to let most of them back in. Definitely not Israel's fault in that regard.
Gaza being under siege and subsequently being raised is down to Hamas and their stupid tactics. All this talk of it being down to desperation and starvation is utter nonsense as well. Whilst the Palestinians receive a large sum of money in aid, Hamas is intent on spending it on the destruction of Israel rather than the advancement of it's people. They are also 8th place in world overweight population rankings. How can this be so if they are on the brink of starvation and death? The Hamas leadership are all sat in their manors in Qatar and the like using their own people as cannon fodder. I find that absolutely shocking and yet most of the world seems to focus on Israel.
The argument that Israel is using disproportionate levels of force is stupid as well. Stop firing the fecking rockets then this would all stop, it is that straight forward.
14 of 15 member UN states (including anti-Semitic Britain and Jew-hating France) support resolutions condemning illegal settlements. The US nullify every one of those resolutions with their vetoes. You're not getting a rough deal.
You can negotiate on cows. Don't think 'radical' Islam is as flexible.
Doesn't the US veto anything the UN comes up with to 'motivate' Israel?
Even if I agree, the UN has an agenda against Israel, the number of civilian deaths are from multiple sources. Everyone must have an agenda against Israel then??
I mean, why would a pro- Palestine or an anti- Israel U.N let this war go so far. If they are so Biased, they could have taken actions against Israel, can they not?? And as Kaos said, Israel's agenda is backed up by U.S which gives them a significant leverage.
Even? If? The people on top of the pyramid admitted it.
Even? If? The people on top of the pyramid admitted it.
H
I posed a question earlier in the thread asking if this would really all stop if Hamas stopped firing rockets. How would you explain the death of the Palestinian boy shot dead back in May and the hundreds killed outside of a Gaza-Israel conflict? How would you also explain the fact that in 79% of tic-for-tac skirmishes its the Israelis who kill first?
As I said, Its irrelevant because, even if you think UN has an agenda against Israel, Everyone else is biased as well???. I mean, all these images we see everyday from various news agencies must be forged and all of them are anti- Semitic and pro- Palestinian, right?.
Again your point is flawed as it really is kill or be killed so I fail to see how it matters who kills who first?
Youtube fake Palestinian videos. thank me later
So, BBC, AFP, Reuters are fake now??
So the unarmed Palestinian kid shot dead by Israeli soldiers back in May then - was that a kill or be killed situation?
No this definitely wrong, never said it wasn't. But we could sit here all night listing the atrocities committed by BOTH parties in 70+ years. Nobody has the right to claim the moral high ground. All I'm saying is in this recent bout of trouble, Hamas are in the wrong.
For all the rockets Hamas is firing, Isreal is committing the lions share of atrocities.All I'm saying is in this recent bout of trouble, Hamas are in the wrong.
Where did I say this?
Getting rather defensive aren't we. The Palestinian movement has been known to "borrow" materials from the crisis in Syria to further their cause in the attempt to win hearts and minds. So forgive me if I think they are past masters at manipulating news footage to suit their aims.
You made the claim that if Hamas were to stop firing rockets then Palestinian innocents would stop getting killed - "it's as simple as that". Empirical evidence has proven otherwise.
I was responding to HR who said, he keeps insisting not many civilians are being killed and data are manipulated. It was your fault running into a conversation without knowing the gist of it.
In this round of trouble it is as simple as that. Would Israel be bombing the shit out of Gaza if they weren't firing rockets?
I knew the full gist of the conversation it is quite easy to get it whenever a thread about Israel is created. It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest that said data WAS being manipulated.
Politicians being bad on both sides doesn't excuse what Israel is doing.
Lots of Albanians immigrate to Greece to find work despite there being widespread racism and police brutality against many of those Albanians. The reason they do this tends to be because they want to house their children, give them an education, feed them and so on which they might not be able to do in Albania. If someone was go on and claim that because their quality of life is worse in Albania it excuses Greece's behavior I would find it outrageous. Similarly, I think it's outrageous to claim Israel treating some Palestinians better than Hamas does means that Israels mistreatment of Palestinians is exaggerated. Given the option, I think those Palestinians would rather live in a state that isn't openly racist towards them.Other than rogue elements of the IDF and Police forces I would say they are treated worse by their own leadership than Israel. How come Palestinians (I personally know plenty) who moved to Israel for work reasons or other valid reasons are totally happy in Israel if what you're saying is completely widespread?
The way you're putting your arguments makes it seem like you're fine with what Isreal is doing though. When it's just a horrible situation for everyone involved and none more so than the civilians in Gaza who are at the receiving end of most the punishment.It doesn't excuse what Hamas is doing either, which is my point as well.
In this round of trouble it is as simple as that. Would Israel be bombing the shit out of Gaza if they weren't firing rockets?
The way you're putting your arguments makes it seem like you're fine with what Isreal is doing though. When it's just a horrible situation for everyone involved and none more so than the civilians in Gaza who are at the receiving end at most the punishment.
I think amongst all of the shit slinging between both side this is the saddest part, that the people in Gaza have been let down by both sides. Israel seem hell bent on understandably protecting itself, yet showing no regard to the poor people living in Gaza and Hamas clearly couldn't care less about the harm it puts its apparent own citizens in the way of. Very sad.
Spot on.
I'm not fine with Israel taking military action but what other choice does it have? It can't let itself be bombed.
Equaly the peope of Gaza wont stay locked in a prison forever
And the same person, says Israel's activity now is "atrocious". Would you agree with him now then??
I was responding to HR who said, he keeps insisting not many civilians are being killed and data are manipulated. It was your fault running into a conversation without knowing the gist of it.
Actually, it does carry out frequent attacks on Gaza without provocation and has been known to violate quite a few ceasefires. The recent Gaza rocket attacks has only incensed them to start randomly shelling dense parts of the city.
And we shouldn't marginalise this as 'this round of trouble', this is a snapshot of a much broader picture.