Israel - Palestine Discussion | Post Respectfully | Discuss more, tweet less

Just on the International Humanitarian Law, is this only to be used with likes of Hamas?

Because any criticism of Israel, and there is plenty from IHL and UN and NATO and likes of Amnesty gets brushed under the carpet.

Clearly, no. There are clear violations of IHL by Israel
 
When it comes to warfare, I think the last twenty or thirty years has shown - whether it’s Gaza, Grozny, Fallujah, Raqqa, Aleppo, or Mosul - that states believe that the presence of Islamist militias dug into urban environments gives them carte blanche to inflict a level of violence and destruction on these areas that their own publics would never accept and rationalize were it inflicted on them for any reason; and that by and large, the rest of the world is content to shrug along (some protests notwithstanding). Obviously there are differences in each case, but I think has been the pattern.

precedent is maybe even older, but the reaction then of course was much more than a shrug

https://www.nytimes.com/1984/04/25/world/key-afghan-area-is-reported-lost-by-guerrillas.html

e - The fact that more bomb tonnage was dropped on Vietnam than in the entirety of WW2, or more on North Korea than on Japan, is one of those facts that circulates a lot in left circles, but not much elsewhere. It suggests that strategic/saturation/terror bombing is an integral part of war when one side involved has the superiority. I think @jeff_goldblum is correct.
 
Last edited:
The same applies on Israel, they target Palestinian civilians indiscriminately.
The second part of your post is what I notice on everyone trying to justify programmed murder the Israeli state do. There is the difference between us, you defend murder, I did not.

Yeah except that Israel do the exact opposite of that, they warn and ask civilians to evacuate before bombing. Not sure how and where were you brainwashed into believing that Israel target civilians. If they wanted to they could turn Gaza into a wasteland within 20 minutes.

Back to facts now, Hamas uses civilians as a human shield and fire rockets from within civilian residences. And they don't target IDF soldiers, they target civilians, like they always have. You probably never heard of the suicide bombings they were carrying out on buses and in restaurants before Israel secured the border, have you?
 
Yeah except that Israel do the exact opposite of that, they warn and ask civilians to evacuate before bombing. Not sure how and where were you brainwashed into believing that Israel target civilians. If they wanted to they could turn Gaza into a wasteland within 20 minutes.

Back to facts now, Hamas uses civilians as a human shield and fire rockets from within civilian residences. And they don't target IDF soldiers, they target civilians, like they always have. You probably never heard of the suicide bombings they were carrying out on buses and in restaurants before Israel secured the border, have you?

But what difference does that really make when they know for sure they will kill civilians while targeting what they consider a legitimate target?

Let's imagine one of those hamas suicide bombers entered the backyard of a house where a military officer from the IDF lived and blew himself up. He kills the officer. At the same time he killed the guy's family and 3 kids who lived next door. Would that be terrorism or a legitimate attack?

I still don't understand why Israel's defenders here keep bringing up hamas when no one here has defended hamas killing any civilians.

Only the people on one side of this argument are trying to legitimize attacking civilians and killing innocent children. Surely you realize how fecked up that sounds.
 
Yeah except that Israel do the exact opposite of that, they warn and ask civilians to evacuate before bombing
Hey!! We are going to bomb your house to the ground. You got 60 mins to pack up your life into a suitcase and run into your new refugee life.
 
But what difference does that really make when they know for sure they will kill civilians while targeting what they consider a legitimate target?

There is a different in intent and methods, which is reflected in different ways like phone calls, roof knocks etc., which while not ideal, do provide people with a notification that they need evacuate.
 
There is a different in intent and methods, which is reflected in different ways like phone calls, roof knocks etc., which while not ideal, do provide people with a notification that they need evacuate.

"which while not ideal" seems like a very sanitized way to say "they kill children by the dozens despite their intent".

Their intent means jack shit to be honest, when the end result is the same.
 
There is a different in intent and methods, which is reflected in different ways like phone calls, roof knocks etc., which while not ideal, do provide people with a notification that they need evacuate.
Some of the roof knocks are a 1 min warning...which is nothing.
 
"which while not ideal" seems like a very sanitized way to say "they kill children by the dozens despite their intent".

Their intent means jack shit to be honest, when the end result is the same.

I was referring to roof knocks.
 
There is a different in intent and methods, which is reflected in different ways like phone calls, roof knocks etc., which while not ideal, do provide people with a notification that they need evacuate.
It's one of the most densely populated places on earth. A roof knock is pointless.
 
There is a different in intent and methods, which is reflected in different ways like phone calls, roof knocks etc., which while not ideal, do provide people with a notification that they need evacuate.

Israel have free access to all lands. Palestinians dont. So getting letters through would be a feat.

Hamas don't need to do the same as there are early warning systems in Israel. And iron dome.

Maybe give the Palestinians a similar device and no casualties?
 
Yeah except that Israel do the exact opposite of that, they warn and ask civilians to evacuate before bombing. Not sure how and where were you brainwashed into believing that Israel target civilians. If they wanted to they could turn Gaza into a wasteland within 20 minutes.

Back to facts now, Hamas uses civilians as a human shield and fire rockets from within civilian residences. And they don't target IDF soldiers, they target civilians, like they always have. You probably never heard of the suicide bombings they were carrying out on buses and in restaurants before Israel secured the border, have you?

Why are people pushing the people as shields narrative? Enough of the organisations have said this isn't true and if anything one of the war crimes against Israel is the use of Palestinian kids as shields.
 
If its only a few minutes, then I definitely agree. Its far too little to make a difference.

Human rights organizations have condemned it many times over.

Again it's whose narrative people want to buy into.
 
Aye. And I don't see where it ends.

It's fairly obvious really. If you don't want to push a false narrative that is.

Most of the Arab countries have basically accepted the 2 state, 1967 borders solution. Even Hamas have accepted this (Meshal has spoken of it too).

This doesn't suit Israel as it's plan always was to have it all. Especially with the minority right wing parties.

Bottom line is there needs to be pressure to sit down and talk. But this won't happen if what we've seen on here and media is to go by. They won't recognize the truth situation by situation. Israel have instigated this incident but for some reason that's not being allowed to get through. Those who do are called anti Semite or sacked etc
 
It's fairly obvious really. If you don't want to push a false narrative that is.

Well, it's obviously where it SHOULD end. But I don't see it happening any time soon. Certainly not the with the current leadership in Israel, which uses Hamas to keep the Palestenians apart, and with the world unwilling to put pressure in Israel.
 
Well, it's obviously where it SHOULD end. But I don't see it happening any time soon. Certainly not the with the current leadership in Israel, which uses Hamas to keep the Palestenians apart, and with the world unwilling to put pressure in Israel.

My "you" was general not aimed at you by the way.

I do agree with you though. There us no will and ultimately with the support Israel gets it's obvious the plan is to let them take over. But they don't say that either.

Interestingly I think there is a "religious twist" to why certain things are not done. For example the reason the "boots on the ground" in Syria (with Isis) argument was argued against politically in the west was because if a hadith. It's also why is pushed for the west to send their armies. Had this happened isis would have got a lot of support from people, if not govts.

Similarly now a full on attack would see by passing of govts like saudi etc by the public.

For me info read about the flags from Khorasan