- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 464
In this thread we see a very concentrated dose of salt. I hope barca win the final via 3x non penalties so I can come and watch everyone cry like babies here
So when you go by the rules, Neymar should get a penalty for sticking his leg out in front of a running opponent? Because that's what brings him down. Meunier literally does nothing other than run (while they grapple at each other, mind), Neymar throws his right leg out, Meunier runs into it (and could literally do nothing in order to avoid doing so) and Neymar goes down. How in the world is that ever a penalty?
As for Messi: I can't, with any kind of certainty, tell whether the tug continued into the area or not, so claiming that to be a clear penalty reeks of desperation.
They benefit more than other teams. They don't benefit more than other BIG teams. They do tend to get favoured against other big teams though, that's trueYou don't think Barca or you guys have had the benefit more than other teams? I find that hard to believe.
Maybe my memory is clouded by the Nani sending off 4 years ago but Barca certainly have something sus going on with UEFA.
Actually people in this thread are the ones trying to create something that's not there. Suarez penalty is the only real controversial/bad decision, the rest were either spot on decisions (like Neymar's penalty which is not even up for debate), or decisions that would not be given normally by most refs (like Mascherano's foul on Di Maria when he took the shot, or Mascherano's hand ball).Your trying too hard to create something that's not there. Those decisions would only go to Barcelona, but under normal Football rules even Liverpool wouldn't get them or claim them. If those are pens then Mascherano's handball is clear as day and his foul on Di Maria is two pens.
Barca got blatant and obvious favoritism again. Get over it.
By looking at the video replay you can try to argue about the arm or the leg (which both made contact) but both were in reality more intent or 'touching' than making actual physical impact, and I'm sure if the ref had seen the replay he wouldn't have given it. However, the way the PSG defender came into Suarez and showed intent to make contact with both the arm and the leg (and even touched Suarez both with his arm and his leg) made it very difficult for the ref not to give the penalty from where he was standing, and I'm pretty sure most refs in his position would have given it as well.Everyone seems to have ignored Marquinhos' legs. He clumsily ran into him which tripped Suarez. The hand wasn't the foul.
Suarez is obviously a huge cheating cnut but the defender turned and ran without looking where Suarez was.
1- So far this is bullsh*t.
2- Marca (Madrid's paper) is the only source that have reported about this so far.
3- This is what they actually reported (literally): Marca claim Aytekin could be demoted to lesser games and may even be sidelined from officiating all together as Uefa wait for the heat to die down."
By looking at the video replay you can try to argue about the arm or the leg (which both made contact) but both were in reality more intent or 'touching' than making actual physical impact, and I'm sure if the ref had seen the replay he wouldn't have given it. However, the way the PSG defender came into Suarez and showed intent to make contact with both the arm and the leg (and even touched Suarez both with his arm and his leg) made it very difficult for the ref not to give the penalty from where he was standing, and I'm pretty sure most refs in his position would have given it as well.
Banning Aytekin for essentially one (sort of) wrong penalty call would be ridiculous. I wouldn't be surprised if they take him out of the current CL season to avoid controversy, but if they would treat everyone like that they'd soon run out of refs who are still allowed to officiate.
I still think it's soft. Wouldn't be too angry if it wasn't given. Would be far from pleased if that was given against us. Not convinced the defender needed to touch Suarez there, Marquinhos was asking for trouble by touching Suarez in the area. He gave the ref a decision to make.
Deniz Ayetkin, the infamous ref, won't take charge of any prominent UCL match again. . . UEFA don't really give more chances to loose cannons (AKA bad referees) like Ayetkin like they did with Overbro & Hannson.
Cnuty Cackir's stock has only risen after his travesty of a performance against us when we played Real Madrid.
Funny enough, back in 2015 in the penultimate game of La Liga, Messi scores a goal that is ruled offside. Athletico draw that game 1-1 and win the league. So in short that decision cost Barca the title.
A lot of people forget that, in fact even Barca fans themselves kinda just accepted it.
People only focus on a negative and never look at the bigger picture.Some of us haven't forgotten. It was the last day of the season too but it was Lahoz as referee...so, predictable
People only focus on a negative and never look at the bigger picture.
Well I was referring to refs in general are terrible and are protected too much from criticismBigger picture is that refs in Spain have been actively screwing Barca for years
Well I was referring to refs in general are terrible and are protected too much from criticism
The bigger picture could be that last year you got a récord of penalties ,unbroken from the 80's or only a couple of penalties against in the last 2 seasons, the paradise of Mascherano.Bigger picture is that refs in Spain have been actively screwing Barca for years
Of course. You weren't in a position to be able to win the league because of the refs in the first placeBigger picture is that refs in Spain have been actively screwing Barca for years
In this thread we see a very concentrated dose of salt. I hope barca win the final via 3x non penalties so I can come and watch everyone cry like babies here
If you put your bias aside, you'd be able to see that Meunier does nothing that Neymar doesn't. Neymar is the first to put his hand on Meunier's chest, and Meunier does the same back. His left hand doesn't even look to make contact with Neymar until after Neymar fells himself with the help of Meunier's leg. What you're seeing (Meunier pulling or shoving Neymar down? I don't know) simply isn't there. It's a standard shoulder to shoulder where Neymar loses out to a stronger opponent.Neymar follows the ball in the first instance. Meunier doesn't even look at the ball goes straight to stop Neymar with both hands (you could even see he is moving away from the ball and his eyes only follow Neymar). Neymar is not grappling Meunier, he is trying to get to the pass made by Iniesta. You have both elements for what constitutes a penalty. You have no intent of playing the ball from the defender, and you have contact with the other player who is normally trying to reach the through ball provided by a teammate. That is a clear penalty for me. No matter if it is Barca, Chelsea, Bayern, Zenit or whoever.
2nd one, I stopped the frame when Verratti let's go of Messi and is also inside the box. Certainly not outside. That is also a penalty, but I agree it's harder to spot in normal speed. However, the referee didn't even award a free kick, and the foul is out of the question. The freekick could have easily been another goal.
Bias aside, those two instances are what I would conisder legitimate penalty claims for several reasons, namely PSG players not even trying to play the ball, only going to stop the attacking player, contact exists, and the occurence is inside the box, even if it's close in Messi's case.
But it's Barca, they are cheats, so it serves them right that they were not given. I tell you right now that if Martial would've been instead of Neymar in the first picture, and Mata in the 2nd, most United fans in here would screem penalty for weeks.
Thanks for that cheap shot at the end, by the way. I guess trying to make an unbiased response to your (clearly biased) assertion that these were stonewall penalties means I'm a hater.
(also, I can guarantee you that most United fans would not be crying over one of our players falling over and another having his shirt tugged at the edge of the box, especially after a game where we won 6-1.)
Also "Graziano Cesari one of the best referees in italy" the man's a punchline
Barca are the biggest cnuts in football. I dislike Real Madrid as well but at least they thrive on being cnuts and happily accept it.
Barca peddle this 'More than a club' myth like they're the saints of the football world.
I had huge respect for them in the 80s and 90s but hate them these days.
Both were penalties imo. Sure Suarez made the most of it but if he doesn't go down he gets no penalty and is obstructed from shooting
you're having a proper meltdown mate. Look up Graziano Cesari if you care. The man's a punchline in italy, nobody takes him seriously. And he was one of the worst referees we had back then(he retired some 15 years ago).Of course, in comparison with you - who have refereed hundreds of football games of domestic and international level, and you are in the Italian Football Hall of Fame - this loser has no idea what he's talking about.
Back to being serious now, one of the best refs Italy had says the two supposed dives are actually clear penalties. 'Without a shadow of a doubt' even.