sun_tzu
The Art of Bore
the lockerbie bombing was done as "revenge" wasnt itThat's shocking...
the lockerbie bombing was done as "revenge" wasnt itThat's shocking...
perhaps there is a coup going on in the background (one can hope right?)Feel like he s being disrespectful of my time. I need to step away and get coffee.
That was Khadaffi and Libya?the lockerbie bombing was done as "revenge" wasnt it
The airforce which will be used in next wars is very different from that of Gulf War and Iraq/Afghanistan wars. F35/F22 are far superior compared to F15/F16 so even if the Russia anti aircraft systems are designed for the US aircrafts, the aircrafts have changed.Finance is a ticking bomb for america.
Another war, and the pension of babyboomer coming in, extreme deficit, it could go ugly in the long run.
The dessert storm in iraq has taken the world by surprises, but as the americans are tied there nations have developed counter weapon for their airforce. Russia anti aircraft missile is designed specifically to counter american airforce. The americans arsenal while still the biggest in the world is getting less impressive. Technology allows the gap to be closer. Unless they're developing some next gen alienshit i doubt they have anything that russia dont have
How long before their finance situation actually prevents them from going to war or improving as a nation, though? Are they like a ticking time bomb?The airforce which will be used in next wars is very different from that of Gulf War and Iraq/Afghanistan wars. F35/F22 are far superior compared to F15/F16 so even if the Russia anti aircraft systems are designed for the US aircrafts, the aircrafts have changed.
The United States has a far superior military than any other country. Heck, even in a hypothetical (no nukes) war between the US and the rest of the world, the US should be able to reach a stalemate and totally destroy the world economy (though damagin their own economy too).
Agree about their financial problems and the 22 trillion deficit.
The response was for the people of Iran. Say to them that we dare to attack US, are claiming 80 US soldiers dead etc, while also not killing the US so it makes possible for the situation to de-escalate.So trump killed their famous general that they are all mourning over, and their response that all feared for, was to shoot , and then ask for de escalation?
Edit : I definitely think this isn't the end I think this is just a public response and they will much more likely have some sort of deadlier response where they can deny accountability
Possibly under iranian instruction - though I doubt the truth will ever be knownThat was Khadaffi and Libya?
The airforce which will be used in next wars is very different from that of Gulf War and Iraq/Afghanistan wars. F35/F22 are far superior compared to F15/F16 so even if the Russia anti aircraft systems are designed for the US aircrafts, the aircrafts have changed.
The United States has a far superior military than any other country. Heck, even in a hypothetical (no nukes) war between the US and the rest of the world, the US should be able to reach a stalemate and totally destroy the world economy (though damagin their own economy too).
Agree about their financial problems and the 22 trillion deficit.
Hardly the biggest expert in finance, but their debt to GDP ratio is the highest (at least from developed countries) after Japan, and it has been increasing rapidly (under every administration). I think that next to healthcare, it is one of the biggest issues they have (not counting global warming which is a global issue). They have very good credibility on their debt/bonds though, cause they have never defaulted in any payment. So what I expect to happen is that they will issue new bonds (which every country does), though on what scale I don't know.How long before their finance situation actually prevents them from going to war or improving as a nation, though? Are they like a ticking time bomb?
Yeh that's my thinking.The response was for the people of Iran. Say to them that we dare to attack US, are claiming 80 US soldiers dead etc, while also not killing the US so it makes possible for the situation to de-escalate.
The real military response will come later and it will be business as usual. Proxy attacks for which they won't take responsibility.
So trump killed their famous general that they are all mourning over, and their response that all feared for, was to shoot , and then ask for de escalation?
Edit : I definitely think this isn't the end I think this is just a public response and they will much more likely have some sort of deadlier response where they can deny accountability
This administration gives me the giggles. What was that entrance?here we go...
That's a relief. Means a measured response from Trump. If American soldiers had been killed then escalation would've been inevitable.No casualties... minimal damage. No American or Iraqi lives lost.
it needed theme music ... smoke and fireworks .... 6/10 ... can do betterThis administration gives me the giggles. What was that entrance?
F22... yes. F35 hasn't been tested in full combat yet. Theoretically it should provide network centric capabilities and all that.
Keep in mind the US and NATO lost their shit when Turkey opted for S400 systems over the Patriot, over fears it would compromise F35 capabilities.
How does the American public/Republicans take the lack of a military response? Can Trump get away with it or is he facing pressure to retaliate and live up to his caps lock twitter diplomacy?
What I was wondering last night...How does the American public/Republicans take the lack of a military response? Can Trump get away with it or is he facing pressure to retaliate and live up to his caps lock twitter diplomacy?
Anybody else seeing Trump supporters suddenly walking it back from “oh well the president tweeted he’d strike back so this is it!”...to... “well there’s no American casualties so technically we don’t have to strike back” ?
Can't wait to see how literally 99% of the people I live around respond to this.For real though... is he about to manufacture another crisis just so he can back down from it and call himself a peacemaker?