paulscholes18
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2013
- Messages
- 20,968
If Kulkarni bowled the 19th and Archer bowled the 20th RR win by 8+ runs
This for sure.Rahane is one of the lamest captain. Stokes is a poor death bowler and yet he gives him the kver rather than kulkarni who was bowling well. Poor captaincy and less said about stokes the better.
Bit sad that most of these captains are bigger than the IPL itself and feel like they can do what they like . What msd did was pathetic and he should be getting banned for that
at all those asking for a ban. It's probably a arguing against umpire or a against spirit of game offence. Should get a match fine and that's it.
Level 3 & 4 penalties run to likes of physical assault and such. Not even close. This is level 1 or 2 and even soft by that.
It has to be a ban. It has to be a deterrent to never, or very rarely, repeat for others.
If it's soft by L1, are you okay for every match to have the batting side's captain come out and disrupt the game for 5 minutes?
It was ridiculous what he did.
Yeah you wonder who's doing the thinking at RR don't you. If you keep losing games from a winning position there's something wrong.Ben stokes is the biggest choker in world cricket, why give him the final over, deserved to lose
at all those asking for a ban. It's probably a arguing against umpire or a against spirit of game offence. Should get a match fine and that's it.
Level 3 & 4 penalties run to likes of physical assault and such. Not even close. This is level 1 or 2 and even soft by that.
Agree.completely about Rahane.Rahane is one of the lamest captain. Stokes is a poor death bowler and yet he gives him the kver rather than kulkarni who was bowling well. Poor captaincy and less said about stokes the better.
Agreed with this. He wasn’t even arguing with the umpires decision per se - but more asking why the umpire called a no ball and only a few seconds later to change his mind. The match was on the line with that decision.at all those asking for a ban. It's probably a arguing against umpire or a against spirit of game offence. Should get a match fine and that's it.
Level 3 & 4 penalties run to likes of physical assault and such. Not even close. This is level 1 or 2 and even soft by that.
It has to be a ban. It has to be a deterrent to never, or very rarely, repeat for others.
If it's soft by L1, are you okay for every match to have the batting side's captain come out and disrupt the game for 5 minutes?
It was ridiculous what he did.
The strength of the punishment should reflect how comfortable the regulator is with the event occurance rate. Is the IPL governing council saying they're okay with what dhoni did happening as often as someone mouthing off in the middle of an over? Imagine if this happens at the same rate as other L2 offenses.Called it. 2.20 is against spirit of game.
OMG, the amount of people in here asking for a ban . It was wrong on Dhoni's part, but some here acting like he just shouted on the umpire's face and verbally assaulted him. It was a close game, and the umpire overturned a correct decision( I don't see anybody questioning that), and emotions probably got the better of him. He was wrong, but does it warrant a one or two game suspension? feels a bit extreme.
For a guy who has masterminded Indian cricket's most remarkable moments of the 21st century, he sure gets hated on a lot. Most people on the internet would make you believe that he is a scrub. Every new kid on the block is better than him, apparently. We are going to see how much of a downgrade the next wk( looking at you, Mr Pant) is going to be when Dhoni retires. I for one, am glad that I witnessed the greatest ever Indian captain at his peak. If he was English or Australian, he would have been valued more.
OMG, the amount of people in here asking for a ban . It was wrong on Dhoni's part, but some here acting like he just shouted on the umpire's face and verbally assaulted him. It was a close game, and the umpire overturned a correct decision( I don't see anybody questioning that), and emotions probably got the better of him. He was wrong, but does it warrant a one or two game suspension? feels a bit extreme.
For a guy who has masterminded Indian cricket's most remarkable moments of the 21st century, he sure gets hated on a lot. Most people on the internet would make you believe that he is a scrub. Every new kid on the block is better than him, apparently. We are going to see how much of a downgrade the next wk( looking at you, Mr Pant) is going to be when Dhoni retires. I for one, am glad that I witnessed the greatest ever Indian captain at his peak. If he was English or Australian, he would have been valued more.
Have said it before, we won't be seeing a captain/leader or a keeper of Dhoni's ilk again in our lifetimes, and that will be a lot more apparent when he retires completely, especially in LOI formats where his tactical nous is second to none.OMG, the amount of people in here asking for a ban . It was wrong on Dhoni's part, but some here acting like he just shouted on the umpire's face and verbally assaulted him. It was a close game, and the umpire overturned a correct decision( I don't see anybody questioning that), and emotions probably got the better of him. He was wrong, but does it warrant a one or two game suspension? feels a bit extreme.
For a guy who has masterminded Indian cricket's most remarkable moments of the 21st century, he sure gets hated on a lot. Most people on the internet would make you believe that he is a scrub. Every new kid on the block is better than him, apparently. We are going to see how much of a downgrade the next wk( looking at you, Mr Pant) is going to be when Dhoni retires. I for one, am glad that I witnessed the greatest ever Indian captain at his peak. If he was English or Australian, he would have been valued more.
Erm, what a tangent to go off onOMG, the amount of people in here asking for a ban . It was wrong on Dhoni's part, but some here acting like he just shouted on the umpire's face and verbally assaulted him. It was a close game, and the umpire overturned a correct decision( I don't see anybody questioning that), and emotions probably got the better of him. He was wrong, but does it warrant a one or two game suspension? feels a bit extreme.
For a guy who has masterminded Indian cricket's most remarkable moments of the 21st century, he sure gets hated on a lot. Most people on the internet would make you believe that he is a scrub. Every new kid on the block is better than him, apparently. We are going to see how much of a downgrade the next wk( looking at you, Mr Pant) is going to be when Dhoni retires. I for one, am glad that I witnessed the greatest ever Indian captain at his peak. If he was English or Australian, he would have been valued more.
Smith in T20s is hardly top tier and Stokes has never fulfilled his potential in IPL. If you talk about Tier 1 foreigners, it would be the likes of Warner, Russell etc. Buttler can fit into that tier, but not the others.What we should be talking about is how poor RR are. Butler, Smith, Stokes and Archer might be the best four overseas players in any team and somehow they find themselves near the bottom of the table. Stokes was on the way to the man of the match award till that garbage he served up in the last over.
Smith in T20s is hardly top tier and Stokes has never fulfilled his potential in IPL. If you talk about Tier 1 foreigners, it would be the likes of Warner, Russell etc. Buttler can fit into that tier, but not the others.
The strength of the punishment should reflect how comfortable the regulator is with the event occurance rate. Is the IPL governing council saying they're okay with what dhoni did happening as often as someone mouthing off in the middle of an over? Imagine if this happens at the same rate as other L2 offenses.
You'd have this happening every 5 matches and the sport would look comical.
Only reason it is L2 is because people would lose their jobs for criticizing Dhoni. Just the way Murali Karthik completely skipped over this in the match presentation.
They are led by one of the most uninspiring person in Rahane. Kohli may not be the best tactician as a captain but give him this squad he will do much better than rahane. Heck he even makes shreyas Iyer look a decent captain. This season is a gonee for RR but they need to have smith leading them next season.What we should be talking about is how poor RR are. Butler, Smith, Stokes and Archer might be the best four overseas players in any team and somehow they find themselves near the bottom of the table. Stokes was on the way to the man of the match award till that garbage he served up in the last over.
Clarity on what? The umpires clearly said it was not a no ball. Dhoni went there just to bully them into giving it.1. In wider context, this is not a frequently recurring event and I don't think this incident or size of penalty will change that.
2. To be taken into context is that Dhoni was seeking clarification and not trying to bully the umpires. It was a bizarre decision which confused both the playing batsmen and pretty much everyone in the audience. Explanations definitely need to be asked...but that was just not the right/place time...but then again...it was final few balls of a nail biting match and getting clarity at that moment was critical.
3. Just like Yellow/Red card in football, ICC Code of Conduct also gives out penalty points for every violation. Reach 12 (I think) and it's suspension. L3 incidents like physical violence get 12 automatically and immediate suspension. For minor offences, accumulation will get you suspended like a second yellow. We don't know how much points Dhoni got for this.
Funny enough because first it was the umpire who called it a noball and then the replays did confirm it was a no ball. What dhoni did was not correct and he is righlt fined but to completely absolve umpire's stupidity is also wrong. Never have we seen a situation when an umpire calls for a noball only to reverse it without any confirmation. Had the umpire not called for a noball then this situation wouldn't even have arised. Any captain would have wanted a clarification especially in such a crunch situation.Clarity on what? The umpires clearly said it was not a no ball. Dhoni went there just to bully them into giving it.
I’m not absolving the umpire of anything. It was an incorrect decision. I’m asking what was left to clarify? The umpire made it very clear to both batsmen that he’d ruled it a legal delivery. Multiple times. Jadeja then decided to stop play anyway and walk to the square leg umpire and then Dhoni walked in to try and make them change the decision. Clarity is needed when there’s confusion, there was none at that point when the umpire repeatedly said he’d deemed it a legal delivery. Whether the umpire was right or wrong does not matter.Funny enough because first it was the umpire who called it a noball and then the replays did confirm it was a no ball. What dhoni did was not correct and he is righlt fined but to completely absolve umpire's stupidity is also wrong. Never have we seen a situation when an umpire calls for a noball only to reverse it without any confirmation. Had the umpire not called for a noball then this situation wouldn't even have arised. Any captain would have wanted a clarification especially in such a crunch situation.
Clarification was needed the moment umpire changed his decision without consulting with the third umpire. Furthermore, the replays did confirm it was a clear waist high no ball. The wholse situation was a mess created by the umpire, had he not given the no ball in the first place then there wouldn't have been any confusion. Again what dhoni did was not correct and he should not be coming to the ground like that but to expect a captain to just stay normal and act as if nothing happened at such a crunch situation is bs. It is just like a referee giving a player red card only to change it and expecting other team to just stay quite and carry on. Umpires should have discussed with each other and gone on to third umpire to check whether it was actually a no ball or not instead they did nothing and just carried on.I’m not absolving the umpire of anything. It was an incorrect decision. I’m asking what was left to clarify? The umpire made it very clear to both batsmen that he’d ruled it a legal delivery. Multiple times. Jadeja then decided to stop play anyway and walk to the square leg umpire and then Dhoni walked in to try and make them change the decision. Clarity is needed when there’s confusion, there was none at that point when the umpire repeatedly said he’d deemed it a legal delivery. Whether the umpire was right or wrong does not matter.
I've asked before, what is this clarification that needed Dhoni himself to come onto the pitch?Clarification was needed the moment umpire changed his decision without consulting with the third umpire. Furthermore, the replays did confirm it was a clear waist high no ball. The wholse situation was a mess created by the umpire, had he not given the no ball in the first place then there wouldn't have been any confusion. Again what dhoni did was not correct and he should not be coming to the ground like that but to expect a captain to just stay normal and act as if nothing happened at such a crunch situation is bs. It is just like a referee giving a player red card only to change it and expecting other team to just stay quite and carry on. Umpires should have discussed with each other and gone on to third umpire to check whether it was actually a no ball or not instead they did nothing and just carried on.
Clarification of calling no ball and then suddenly changing it without consulting with the thrid umpire.I've asked before, what is this clarification that needed Dhoni himself to come onto the pitch?
You're just running in circles. Everyone accepts Dhoni walking was wrong. We we're just disputing your point that no clarification was needed. It was a unique case both the umpiring decision, the way the decision was made and reaction to that decision was all wrong. One led to other. I don't believe such unique set of circumstances would frequently occur or is severe enough to warrant an outright ban.I've asked before, what is this clarification that needed Dhoni himself to come onto the pitch?
Clarification of calling no ball and then suddenly changing it without consulting with the thrid umpire.
The only clarification that was warranted there was whether the ball had been signalled a no ball or not. Nonetheless, Jadeja made a right fist out of going further and those questions was already sought and provided to him.You're just running in circles. Everyone accepts Dhoni walking was wrong. We we're just disputing your point that no clarification was needed. It was a unique case both the umpiring decision, the way the decision was made and reaction to that decision was all wrong. One led to other. I don't believe such unique set of circumstances would frequently occur or is severe enough to warrant an outright ban.
Jeez but how do we know umpire actually gave a clarification and even if he gave it still doesn't make sense considering it was a no ball. When have we seen this ever happen when the umpire has given a no ball and then changing it without even going to the thrid umpire. People saying this is not a gully cricket for dhoni to come on to the ground but the same should apply for umpire, this is not a gully cricket for the umpires to just change the decision without consulting with the third umpire. You cannot have one rule for the player and one for the umpire.That was already asked by Jadeja, multiple times, hand gestures and all included and answered by the umpire. Dhoni disagreeing with it doesn't give him the license to walk onto the pitch and bully the umpires.