DomesticTadpole
Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Hope Matterface is not going to remind us that Saka missed a penalty in every game he commentates.
It is. Andorra should be a minimum 5-0 win, even with a B side. They're a bit better than Gibraltar and Farao, but well below Estonia and such.
England have been walking about, mostly passing back and sideways. They had three shots on target for their first three goals, hardly a brilliant performance. This opposition should have been hammered, even with a 'B' team out there.What score would be acceptable for you to reduce the embarrassment levels?
Such a pathetic argument
How so? The manager put the teenager in a bad spot, taking the final pk in England’s first final since 1966. One could not imagine a more untenable position the boy was put in by the manager, who had substantially better options available to him.
The abuse he took was beyond sickening, but the point at hand is that Southgate should never have put that particular player in that particular position.
England have been walking about, mostly passing back and sideways. They had three shots on target for their first three goals, hardly a brilliant performance. This opposition should have been hammered, even with a 'B' team out there.
What's he done to impress you so much?
trying to play as a DLP but can't pass to save his life.
Who were they? That England squad had predominantly inexperienced penalty takers. I don't think he should have gone 5th but Kane was the only regular penalty taker in the squad. Rashford used to be a regular penalty taker but apart from that, there weren't many credible options.How so? The manager put the teenager in a bad spot, taking the final pk in England’s first final since 1966. One could not imagine a more untenable position the boy was put in by the manager, who had substantially better options available to him.
The abuse he took was beyond sickening, but the point at hand is that Southgate should never have put that particular player in that particular position.
It is. Andorra should be a minimum 5-0 win, even with a B side. They're a bit better than Gibraltar and Farao, but well below Estonia and such.
Not really. They rarely get beaten by more than 4 these days. France beat them 4-0 & 3-0 in the qualifying for the last Euros. In their 4-0 win they started with a strong team with Pogba, Greizmann and Mbappe. Switzerland beat them 2-1 and 3-0. Portugal beat them 6-0 and 2-0 in 2017. Portugal had to bring Ronaldo off the bench to beat them in their 2-0 win. Belgium beat them 4-1 and 6-0 in 2015.
Exactly this. Embarrassing that some posters don't know this.
I stand corrected on Andorra! Didn't know they've improved. Still thought they were footballing midgets ala Gibraltar.
If England win today 9-0 the same people would be moaning about how it means nothing and it's only Andorra.
Exactly. England are hated on here, it is what it is.
If England has passed the ball crisply and played with a more positive attitude, this team were there for the taking.Exactly this. Embarrassing that some posters don't know this.
I stand corrected on Andorra! Didn't know they've improved. Still thought they were footballing midgets ala Gibraltar.
FFS
I'm so embarrassed I didn't know Andorra have improved. My reputation!
If England has passed the ball crisply and played with a more positive attitude, this team were there for the taking.
they're still a fecking shite teamExactly this. Embarrassing that some posters don't know this.
they're still a fecking shite team
And some of you are trying to make it out that they're decent now? Jesus christ
The levels some of you would go to for the England NT
To be fair the Republic of Ireland would probably struggle against Andorra.
To be fair the Republic of Ireland would probably struggle against Andorra.
Like they should. The green cnuts.
they're still a fecking shite team
And some of you are trying to make it out that they're decent now? Jesus christ
The levels some of you would go to for the England NT
Should have been more.They beat them 4-0.
Should have been more.
Does anyone else think it’s poor forward planning for Southgate to include Lingard? He’s soon to be 30 and is about 7th or 8th choice at his club after refusing to move for game time this summer.
What exactly does Southgate think he’s going to be getting out of Lingard in 12-18 months?
If you're happy with that lacklustre display, good for you. I'm not.Shoulda, woulda, coulda.
Really who gives a shit?
Does anyone else think it’s poor forward planning for Southgate to include Lingard? He’s soon to be 30 and is about 7th or 8th choice at his club after refusing to move for game time this summer.
What exactly does Southgate think he’s going to be getting out of Lingard in 12-18 months?
Who would you have there instead? He's done his job well.
Greenwood, obviously.Who would you have there instead? He's done his job well.
You're on a United forum and you're asking who should play RW for England?
Greenwood, obviously.
I like Jesse and understand what he can bring to England but it’s short sighted persisting with him.
Forgot about thatYou beat them 4-1 recently but I'd imagine that they played a bit more against you. We had 89% possession which shows just how defensive they were tonight. They were beating you after 52 minutes.
Like they should. The green cnuts.