By the way, I'm Rudolph to Edgar's Santa, at least while I have time - not sure about the labels, but this is me notifying all of you of my non-neutralness
Is it me or this is simply an All Time draft?
I think there are some subtle differences and those will increase in the next few rounds. Like Messi and Zidane being taken much later than in an all-time, Fontaine (and Hamrin) taken in the first round.
Exactly
There's obviously an element of some taking up the chance of rolling it up with the NT All Time XI idea.
I can see some players with no real NT tourno pedigree overlooked... but also those with great pedigree but no great career getting passed on.
Knowledge of tournos is obviously an issue too (e.g. haven't seen Copa greats getting a look-in).
I just wonder to what extent the neutral will really factor in the nuance when the managers are already a bit patchy with it beyond World Cups.
Full on Russian. Not sure that your praise is justified though, the overcomplicated nature of my sentences comes from inability to form shorter and simpler phrases, but thanks!Are you full on Russian or just moved there? If it's the former then your English is incredible.
This is me informing you of my suckupiness
He's got some balls winging it for Gullit until R5.
He's got some balls winging it for Gullit until R5.
Ridiculous.
Tourno draft? More a "rebuild your favourite team" draft. Which must be lovely, but seems to me runs against some of the real standouts. E.g. nobody would want to rebuild Mexico 86 Argentina, although they were far better and tactically nuanced/interesting than they get credit for.
Also, just another thought, the specific rule about single tournament being the basis to judge performance skews it more towards the GOATs IMO as someone like the all-time leading WC goal scorer never had a single dominating tournament so its no surprise he is still unpicked.
about time....but funny thing is, usually he is the first name on my shortlist and he gets picked in first 2, max 3 rounds yet now when he doesnt fit into my team he lasts until the end of the fifth round
Joga is still around, he's part of the German lobby since he believes me how incredible that 72 team was.
He's got some balls winging it for Gullit until R5.
Ridiculous.
Tourno draft? More a "rebuild your favourite team" draft. Which must be lovely, but seems to me runs against some of the real standouts. E.g. nobody would want to rebuild Mexico 86 Argentina, although they were far better and tactically nuanced/interesting than they get credit for.
Perhaps these two got counted as one..I've still yet to see 2 players dove-tail as well as 'those 2' did.
How long can you resist though if he remains unpicked. He'd fit perfectly into your team right now .Heh, was just about to go down that route in this draft but had already done that theme before and wanted to try something more spontaneous and less meticulous. Also the 1972 side is probably the side that I've watched the most - probably more than 10 times, absolutely amazing stuff and I've still yet to see 2 players dove-tail and take the piss as well as 'those 2' did.
Should I put him out of his misery?How long can you resist though if he remains unpicked. He'd fit perfectly into your team right now .
I just wonder to what extent the neutral will really factor in the nuance when the managers are already a bit patchy with it beyond World Cups.
Perhaps these two got counted as one..
Should I put him out of his misery?
Not sure I'd like him as much in your side, but there's another big favourite of Joga's who'd be absolutely amazing for your team.Should I put him out of his misery?
Well, yeah. You brought the individuals into the discussion, not my fault at all.Btw which genius decided to tag @Balu . Was hoping they'd go under the radar for some more time, and of course I'm not doing myself any favours here
Not sure I'd like him as much in your side, but there's another big favourite of Joga's who'd be absolutely amazing for your team.
Still find it unbelievable just how good they were at knowing each other every single second on the pitch, never seen anything quite like that level of chemistry and understanding. The fact that the duo happened to be the pillars behind one of the most dominant club sides as well as one of the greatest national team runs is a mere afterthought. One of the most unreal things I've ever witnessed in the sport.Xavi, Iniesta are right up there but they are a relatively more conventional partnership (playmaking CM and a facilitating AM - doing them disservice with that description but you get the point)
I just don't really enjoy playing out the games. If it was just drafts I'd still be in the thick of it.
Still find it unbelievable just how good they were at knowing each other every single second on the pitch, never seen anything quite like that level of chemistry and understanding. The fact that the duo happened to be the pillars behind one of the most dominant club sides as well as one of the greatest national team runs is a mere afterthought. One of the most unreal things I've ever witnessed in the sport.
I just don't really enjoy playing out the games. If it was just drafts I'd still be in the thick of it.
Klose is great though, very underrated player. His reputation suffers from the general crap-ness of the mid-noughties Bundesliga and from his Bayern move not working out. He was a top striker at his peak around 2006, WC top scorer too, so I don't know why he'd only be appreciated for his longevity. With his goals, his work rate, and his eye for a teammate in the box, he'd be a credit to any side in this draft; all that's really preventing him from being the complete package is his lack of elite technical ability.
Amateur. We will show him how it's really done.
In terms of style, the French Klose is also under-appreciated
Giroud?