@
zing You have missed my point altogether always. Maybe one last time I will explain. Bowling has never been India's strong point and without that domination like Australia did or West Indies had before is impossible. That said, overseas there have been instances where we have lost matches because of batting. Sure, batting will fail once in a while, and that is acceptable but they have failed on some crucial moments, barring which maybe India could ahve had couple of memorable series win overseas.
You can keep on banging drum about bowling losing previous test, but batting were equally responsible. It is laughable when biased people like you say that because bowlers conceded so much we lost. No we didn't. Collapsing for 200 is equally bad. Had India scored 350 in first inning, they could have won.