TheReligion
Abusive
India playing well makes the demolition job England did on them on their own patch even more superb.
Yeah, bit off. England showed that if you bring along a couple of good spinners the advantage to India is taken away, same pitch for both sides.
Complete and utter garbage. Honestly if I was the touring captain and I rocked up to that strip on the first day and watched an offie take 7 wickets and spinners take 10 over all in just over a day, I'd pack up and go home and tell them to go and get fecked.
Granted hardly any of our flat track bullies that have grown up on the back stool clubbing just short of a length true deliveries can play spin. But that is complete and utter rubbish.
'Stick it up your arse India you wankers' kind of thing.
Oh and Nathan Lyon you're a good bloke and clearly a very very very unlucky cricketer and I feel sorry for you having to be put up as the spearhead Aussie spinner. It's an absolute shame that he is going to be scapegoated and dragged through the dirt. He's not complete shite but he's not top tier test standard, in fact he is very far from it and should have never been there in the first place. At least not in the vanguard expected to take wickets bowling invariable arcy loop offies. (I've met the bloke and he's a top top bloke, so I feel sorry for him.)
Bang on. That's why India are clear favorites here. Australia don't have a quality spinner like Swann.
The quality of test cricket isn't that great ATM, IMO.
SA are clear no. 1 team in the world.
After that there's Pakistan and England who're equal. Then comes Australia and probably Sri Lanka. We're higher than WI, NZ etc but lower than Australia.
Yeah, bit off. England showed that if you bring along a couple of good spinners the advantage to India is taken away, same pitch for both sides.
Pakistan absolutely thrashed England 3-0 in favorable conditions. If there's an India-Pakistan series in India, then Pakistan would win it easily considering their excellent spin attack.
SA also demolished England in England just six months back, so not sure why Pakistan being poor against SA makes them inferior to England.
We are talking current sides right not 6 months ago. I wouldn't call it absolutely thrashed, the matches were close however England did lose. Pakistan are poor away, proved by SA series while England have proved they have improved after that series with a good win in India and hopefully winning in NZ. Playing well in favourable conditions and playing poor away doesn't make you the no 2 test team in the world. Pakistan's away record is abysmal.
It's a strange one with Pakistan. I would back them to beat anyone in their own conditions including South Africa. But in non-sub continent conditions I would always back the home team. Maybe I am underrating them a tad.
Might give them the nod at 2nd place purely because I think they may be the only team capable of beating South Africa (albeit just at home) at this present moment.
Matches weren't close at all.
You lost one match by an innings and other by 50 runs. You lost 2-0 in a 3 match series. That's a trashing.
One was a low run chase, admittingly we collapsed and were generally poor against spin in particular Ajmal. The team selection was also wrong for the first test. We seem to have learnt from that for the India series. I think England are the no 2 side at the moment, Pakistan for me need to be more consistant away from home for them to take that spot. I think if they played India in India, it would be a close series.
Eh I'm talking about the SA in England series mate!
Oh and trust me if Pakistan came to India, then they'd defeat us by a good margin.
Don't get the moaning about the pitch at all. We are well within our rights as the home team to prepare a pitch that gives us the best chance of winning. What the feck is the point in playing at home and playing on tracks that don't suit us??
Anyone got any highlights of the day?
Eh I'm talking about the SA in England series mate!
Oh and trust me if Pakistan came to India, then they'd defeat us by a good margin.
England are a top test side, but some on here are so pig headed in their hatred towards English cricket that they can't admit it.
A world class SA beat an England in disarray, and yet England still came mighty close to drawing the series if I remember well.
Ok. Carry on with your delusion.
Mighty close
I'm saying they are a top3 side, or equal with Pakistan. That's not pig headedness.
What was it; 60 runs over 5 days with England throwing the bat at it? In most conditions England would muller Pakistan btw.
You only got close because Swann went berserk at the end. The gulf b/w the two teams was clear in the series.
On second question, in sub continental conditions Pakistan will muller you. In England, Australia, SA I guess you will defeat them easily.
Pakistan are nowhere as good as England.
KM doing some serious over-rating here.
Depends all on the conditions. If the conditions are favourable then Pak will defeat England.
Depends all on the conditions. If the conditions are favourable then Pak will defeat England.
England are getting better in sub-continental conditions now. Much improved from 12 months ago. They're constantly improving.
Pakistan, like ha_rooney says, would get hammered in England.
Pakistan would get hammered away anywhere -- SA, England, Australia. Just look at their last series in those countries. Plus, Pakistan's bowling is not as good as it used to be. Worse than when they last played in Australia and England. Their pace attack is the weakest I've seen them put out in quite a long time.
England have drawn 1-1 in Sri Lanka and won in India. Respectable record.
It's 1) SA 2) England and quite a big gap after that. I'd say India, Pakistan and Australia are all about even.
Australia may have found themselves a new spinner in that Fawad Ahmed, but their batting is still shitty.
Cowan's good only for a sub-40 average, IMO. Hughes again is ordinary.
Clarke is the only great player they have. Watson can be good and Khawaja looks like a potential star. But they need to fill up 4 more slots. Wade is playing just because Inverarity is obsessed with youth. Haddin's clearly better.
I don't mind preparing a pitch to suit the home side, but some of the pitches England played on weren't even 'prepared'. It's starting to get farcical.
Exactly, I don't mind a bit of a toilet. Something that will provide good all-round test cricket but when the home side bowls 130 overs of spin in an entire test and takes all 20 wickets....
It's a bit farcical. Though I promise I won't moan to much. To many of our gumby batsman grew up on roads clubbing outside the off stump. Need to learn to be like Dohni and just clog across the line all day..
I don't mind preparing a pitch to suit the home side, but some of the pitches England played on weren't even 'prepared'. It's starting to get farcical.
oh feck off. 800 runs were scored in the first 2 innings and the match went 5 days. Would have been longer too if your batting didn't collapse. You prepare bouncy fast pitches. We prepare slow, spinning wickets. Its called home advantage. Deal with it.
Australia needs some inspiration in their bowling department (may be a surd, whose parents migrated there in the 60's. ). Bowling Pattinson in three overs bursts is not going to get them anywhere in this series. Besides the Mohali wicket, the others won't have any pace in them, and will be slow and low.
Calm down princess.
look at those cracks... It's like playing on Bexley Oval first day of the season.
Bowled off a good length coming through at shin height. Just another first session India.