India politics thread

Wasn't the FIR primarily filed agains him for speaking ill against Sonia?



https://www.thehindu.com/news/citie...fir-against-arnab-goswami/article31410543.ece

The FIR filed by the police include charges of giving provocation with intent to cause riot, promoting enmity between two groups on grounds of religion or race, deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs and defamation under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Mr. Goswami, in his debate show on television, had allegedly made inflammatory statements regarding the Palghar mob lynching case.
 
Do republic have a reporter in the interrogation room with Arnab? Or is Arnab reporting his own interrogation periodically?
Very naive of you to assume that Republic TV needs someone to be in a place to report about things from that place.
Reporting lies comes naturally to them.
 


https://www.thehindu.com/news/citie...fir-against-arnab-goswami/article31410543.ece

The FIR filed by the police include charges of giving provocation with intent to cause riot, promoting enmity between two groups on grounds of religion or race, deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs and defamation under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Mr. Goswami, in his debate show on television, had allegedly made inflammatory statements regarding the Palghar mob lynching case.


Going by the FIR filed it is clear the main reason it was filed was because Arnab questioned sonia Gandhi. If you read the para 2 of the FIR you will know the base of the complain was more to do with Arnab questioning Gandhi parivar and less to do with any attack on minorities.

I didn't watch the show but how is asking sonia Gandhi to comment on palgarh lynching communal or against the minority. He was merely asking Congress and sonia gandhi to show the same concern for the sadhus as they would show when people from minorities are discriminated and killed. I see nothing wrong with that.

Also, there is no denying arnab being biased. And that is why I found this whole FIR filed when he questioned Sonia to be very petty. If you really had to.file a FIR it should have been filed against him long back considering his biasness. Filing it now just shows Congress' petiness.
 
Last edited:
Going by the FIR filed it is clear the main reason it was filed was because Arnab questioned sonia Gandhi. If you read the para 2 of the FIR you will know the base of the complain was more to do with Arnab questioning Gandhi parivar and less to do with any attack on minorities.

I didn't watch the show but how is asking sonia Gandhi to comment on palgarh lynching communal or against the minority. He was merely asking Congress and sonia gandhi to show the same concern for the sadhus as they would show when people from minorities are discriminated and killed. I see nothing wrong with that.

Also, there is no denying arnab being biased. And that is why I found this whole FIR filed when he questioned Sonia to be very petty. If you really had to.file a FIR it should have been filed against him long back considering his biasness. Filing it now just shows Congress' petiness.
And how does it matter if the FIR is filed on charges like causing enmity, provoking riots etc.
 
And how does it matter if the FIR is filed on charges like causing enmity, provoking riots etc.
But again how is questioning sonia gandhi or asking her to speak up for sadhu lynching against minority or instigating people to riot. I am just going by the FIR report.

It just doesn't make sense. Arnab has been vocal and in fact sprouted more crap in the past but there was no FIR by congress then but he questions sonia and calls her by Italian name all hell breaks out and congress is crying.
 
Going by the FIR filed it is clear the main reason it was filed was because Arnab questioned sonia Gandhi. If you read the para 2 of the FIR you will know the base of the complain was more to do with Arnab questioning Gandhi parivar and less to do with any attack on minorities.

I didn't watch the show but how is asking sonia Gandhi to comment on palgarh lynching communal or against the minority. He was merely asking Congress and sonia gandhi to show the same concern for the sadhus as they would show when people from minorities are discriminated and killed. I see nothing wrong with that.

Also, there is no denying arnab being biased. And that is why I found this whole FIR filed when he questioned Sonia to be very petty. If you really had to.file a FIR it should have been filed against him long back considering his biasness. Filing it now just shows Congress' petiness.
Yet you are here defending Arnab Goswami and his communally charged inflammatory comments.
 
Yet you are here defending Arnab Goswami and his communally charged inflammatory comments.
So questioning sonia Gandhi is communal. Have you even bothered to read the FIR. Read the para 2 and tell me how is asking sonia to comment on palgarh instance communal or instigating violence.
 
So questioning sonia Gandhi is communal. Have you even bothered to read the FIR. Read the para 2 and tell me how is asking sonia to comment on palgarh instance communal or instigating violence.
FIR is not only filed for defamation against Sonia Gandhi but also for various other inflammatory things said by goswami in his show. I suggest you first watch the show instead of blindly peddling propaganda of BJP IT Cell.
 
So questioning sonia Gandhi is communal. Have you even bothered to read the FIR. Read the para 2 and tell me how is asking sonia to comment on palgarh instance communal or instigating violence.
:lol:

communal are the statements he made. And that’s why the FIR against him.
 
FIR is not only filed for defamation against Sonia Gandhi but also for various other inflammatory things said by goswami in his show. I suggest you first watch the show instead of blindly peddling propaganda of BJP IT Cell.
:lol: :lol:

Did you even read the FIR or are just going to interpret everything wrong? Maybe you should read your own tweets that you share.
 
Read the FIR and then come defending sonia.



"Sonia from Rome is happy that saints are being beaten. She will report to Italy that saints are being beaten where her party has power."
This is a communal statement, not a political one.
 
:lol: :lol:

Did you even read the FIR or are just going to interpret everything wrong? Maybe you should read your own tweets that you share.
Unlike you I've watched the show and also read the FIR, and not only the second paragraph but in full.
 
- PMNRF was made in 1948.
- CAG was constituted by virtue of the constitution through article 148, the constitution came into existence in 1950.
- Therefore, since PMNRF predated CAG it could not come directly under the purview of the CAG. However it still comes under its purview indirectly because all proceeds that go out of the fund is audited by the CAG.

Performance audit can still be done for PM CARES fund as far as I understand. I get the suspicion but this was created for pandemic and PMNRF can be used for other relief work. Thought process might have been to accelerate the relief effort with dedicated fund.


India Overpaid For Chinese COVID-19 Test Kits? What Court Case Reveals

The COVID-19 test kits were sold to the government at an inflated price by the Indian distributor, Real Metabolics, it has emerged from a legal dispute between the distributor and the importer that went to the Delhi High Court.

New Delhi: India was asked to pay double the rate for Chinese Rapid Antibody Tests for coronavirus, which have been put on hold in many states because of faulty results.

The government today cancelled the order for COVID-19 test kits which were being sold at an inflated price by the Indian distributor, Real Metabolics. Details of the marked up price emerged from a legal dispute between the distributor and the importer that went to the Delhi High Court.

The government, through the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) had ordered five lakh rapid antibody test kits from Chinese firm Guangzhou Wondfo on March 27. NDTV has accessed the purchase order signed between ICMR - the nodal body for India's coronavirus response - and Aark Pharmaceuticals.

On April 16, the Indian Ambassador to China, Vikram Misri, tweeted that 650,000 kits, including Rapid Antibody Tests and RNA Extraction Kits had been despatched to India.

The test kits were bought by the importer, Matrix, for Rs 245 apiece from China. Yet, the distributors, Real Metabolics and Aark Pharmaceuticals, asked the government for Rs 600 for each kit, which means a 140 per cent mark-up.

The test kits have been found to be "under-performing", the government said today, asking states and hospitals to stop using the kits. Since "due process was followed (not paying 100% advance before receiving the order), the government does not stand to lose a single rupee", an official statement said.

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/cor...vid-19-test-kits-court-fight-reveals-2218757?

Another scam that will be buried by the media. I still remember the good old days when the media used to carry out witch-hunts against governments even on flimsiest evidence of a possible scam.

Didn't government clarified that all faulty test kits will be returned and will cost government no money?

Also I don't think it's fair to quote price from a distributor who isn't licensed to distribute test kits in India. Negotiations might be better but still was under the ICMR rates for antibody test.

Also the situation is dire and there is incredible amount of pressure on the every agency. These kits are getting backordered as rich countries are overbidding and not leaving a lot of room for negotiation.
 


"Sonia from Rome is happy that saints are being beaten. She will report to Italy that saints are being beaten where her party has power."
This is a communal statement, not a political one.

Even if that line about Sonia is ignored, just look at the headline at top which says "Is being a Hindu in India a sin?" and at bottom "Is there a silence because a Hindu is killed?" and another "Why Hindus are under attack?"
It basically implies that a murder was committed by someone from a minority community.
 
So questioning sonia Gandhi is communal. Have you even bothered to read the FIR. Read the para 2 and tell me how is asking sonia to comment on palgarh instance communal or instigating violence.
Arnab went too far. You can't claim conspiracy theories as news. He basically mentioned that Sonia is reporting to Christian missionaries in Rome and doing their work of beating up saints.

But FIR is a joke. It was more of a personal attack than communal.
 
Last edited:
Even if that line about Sonia is ignored, just look at the headline at top which says "Is being a Hindu in India a sin?" and at bottom "Is there a silence because a Hindu is killed?" and another "Why Hindus are under attack?"
It basically implies that a murder was committed by someone from a minority community.

That headline is inferring to Batla "tears" and countless other outrage when people of different community were involved.

Police literally gave up those 2 people to be lynched and not a peep. He never mentioned the identity of attacker in that show.

Also Arnab was forced out of Times Now by Congress pressure. It's personal for him against the Congress. I don't think he is communal as he has been bashing almost everyone for a long time now. It's just his Islamic bashing or criticism makes liberal news.
 
Arnab went too far. You can't claim conspiracy theories as news. He basically mentioned that Sonia is reporting to Christian missionaries in Rome and doing their work of beating up saints.
I am not defending arnab and his antics. I always found him someone who should not be given much attention. But I equally find congress party people's stance to be petty. Imagine leaders starting to arrest journalists because they are being questioned.
 
Also Arnab was forced out of Times Now by Congress pressure.
Eh? There is no way this is true. Times Now is almost as pro-BJP as Republic. Rahul ShivShankar is called mini-Arnab for a reason, though now folks also call him RSS.
By all accounts, Arnab left Times Now so he could make even more money with his own channel since TimesNow was pretty much running on his brand.
 
Eh? There is no way this is true. Times Now is almost as pro-BJP as Republic. Rahul ShivShankar is called mini-Arnab for a reason, though now folks also call him RSS.
By all accounts, Arnab left Times Now so he could make even more money with his own channel since TimesNow was pretty much running on his brand.
Does arnab outright own the republic?
 


"Sonia from Rome is happy that saints are being beaten. She will report to Italy that saints are being beaten where her party has power."
This is a communal statement, not a political one.

This seems more of a personal attack than communal. Just like accusing modi of being a nazi. Imagine if his party filed FIR for the same. It was a petty move by Congress party.
 
Eh? There is no way this is true. Times Now is almost as pro-BJP as Republic. Rahul ShivShankar is called mini-Arnab for a reason, though now folks also call him RSS.
By all accounts, Arnab left Times Now so he could make even more money with his own channel since TimesNow was pretty much running on his brand.

There was a strong rumour during his resignation that Congress forced his exit after diabolical Rahul Gandhi interview.

But your account is as good as mine.


Edit :

https://hillpost.in/2013/08/top-7-i...by-politicians/95166/comment-page-3/#comments


Times Group is owned by Bennet & Coleman. The Italian Robertio Mindo who has a share in the group is a close relative of Sonia Gandhi.
 
Last edited:
This seems more of a personal attack than communal. Just like accusing modi of being a nazi. Imagine if his party filed FIR for the same. It was a petty move by Congress party.
It's ironic that Arnab is called "Joseph Goebbels" while Sonia Gandhi has much closer history to Nazi Party.

Arnab is an easy Target. Subramanian Swamy has mentioned publicly that Sonia's dubious past before Rajiv Gandhi met her. Let's see how many FIR they put against him.
 
Read the FIR and then come defending sonia.
Already did. He's clearly saying that a christian woman is happy that the guys got killed and will send a report to the Italian government and that she will get praised for that. On top of that, he's clearly instigating with statements like "80% Hindus" and all that.

Sure Congress is petty with the FIR, but normies can't take an action against a guy protected by the government, so swings and roundabouts. In any case, it's just a smokescreen to hide the events which are happening in the background. Typical of the NDA government.
 
Already did. He's clearly saying that a christian woman is happy that the guys got killed and will send a report to the Italian government and that she will get praised for that. On top of that, he's clearly instigating with statements like "80% Hindus" and all that.

Sure Congress is petty with the FIR, but normies can't take an action against a guy protected by the government, so swings and roundabouts. In any case, it's just a smokescreen to hide the events which are happening in the background. Typical of the NDA government.

I didn't think he used the word christian woman. His whole rant was mocking and questioning sonia Gandhi and Congress.

I know we have disagreed on political aspects and will probably continue doing so but trust me in this time neither sonia nor arnab should be given this much importance. The fact that Congress party got triggered doesn't sit well.

I don't care about arnab but I feel Congress party are not doing themselves any favors by getting involved in a battle with a journalist. I keep on saying the country needs a strong congress party otherwise we are just going to have BJP dominate for years without any competition.
 
And funny you are suddenly ok with journalists being attacked and his FOE taken. Hypocrisy is always funny.

People are happy when journalist ( or any other person ) they don't like gets attacked. Same people will cry when their favourites will get attacked.
 
I didn't think he used the word christian woman. His whole rant was mocking and questioning sonia Gandhi and Congress.
Watch the entire rant again. he hasn't used the word but he has clearly implied it for instigation.
I know we have disagreed on political aspects and will probably continue doing so but trust me in this time neither sonia nor arnab should be given this much importance. The fact that Congress party got triggered doesn't sit well.
In any case, it's just a smokescreen to hide the events which are happening in the background. Typical of the NDA government.
 
This seems more of a personal attack than communal. Just like accusing modi of being a nazi. Imagine if his party filed FIR for the same. It was a petty move by Congress party.

No, then why isn't it aimed at Rahul? Why the reference to Italy? Why the reference to Rome? Whom is she sending these reports to about Hindus killed?
This is basic communal poison.