(I'm actually not) Blaming Moyes for transfers

What makes me laugh is the condescending reds always having a pop at 'spotty FM playing teenagers' for wanting top quality signings, while they try out this concept of 'supporting our successful team' seem to forget that the current team they are supporting are a bunch of previous big money signings.

Our players generally came here in the same way others want us to continue strengthening. Signings, particularly that of very good players, is a good thing for the team. Signings are the team.

Once upon a time, Persie was a 'shiny new toy' being lusted over by muppets (while the couture fans chose to not get involved and talk about how Rooney/Welbeck would be affected instead), but now he is a key part of the team, just as any new signing would be.

I will never get the bickering and competitiveness of transfer forum opinion.

The idea that part of supporting a team is coveting players off other teams is quite new. Yes we have always loved new additions, and always will, but the panic from the lack of new additions is quite new and hugely disproportionate. Maybe it's just because it's the off season and it fills a void, but it's like filling a void with a void and that void is filled with fabrications. It's all quite odd to me.
 
This isn't a criticism of Moyes?



One of the players we're chasing is someone we looked at while he was at Wigan. The other was watched when we our scouts were seen at Liege games apparently looking at Defour. Both are amongst the best in their position in the PL. It's exactly the type of player we looked at signing under Sir Alex. I didn't say Moyes doesn't pick the players we sign, I said he picks from a list of players we've already looked at and judged to be potential United players. They may not be the same ones Sir Alex would have signed - as mentioned in the OP - but they would've come from the same list/group of players.

Fair enough. I'm personally not convinced that he isn't allowed to work from his own list as opposed to Fergie's.

For a start, Fergie's list probably didn't have any midfielders on it.
 
What makes me laugh is the condescending reds always having a pop at 'spotty FM playing teenagers' for wanting top quality signings, while they try out this concept of 'supporting our successful team' seem to forget that the current team they are supporting are a bunch of previous big money signings.

Our players generally came here in the same way others want us to continue strengthening. Signings, particularly that of very good players, is a good thing for the team. Signings are the team.

Once upon a time, Persie was a 'shiny new toy' being lusted over by muppets (while the couture fans chose to not get involved and talk about how Rooney/Welbeck would be affected instead), but now he is a key part of the team, just as any new signing would be.

I will never get the bickering and competitiveness of transfer forum opinion.


:lol: Good post.
 
The idea that part of supporting a team is coveting players off other teams is quite new. Yes we have always loved new additions, and always will, but the panic from the lack of new additions is quite new and hugely disproportionate. Maybe it's just because it's the off season and it fills a void, but it's like filling a void with a void and that void is filled with fabrications. It's all quite odd to me.

And how is that different from anything I've said?
 
The idea that part of supporting a team is coveting players off other teams is quite new. Yes we have always loved new additions, and always will, but the panic from the lack of new additions is quite new and hugely disproportionate. Maybe it's just because it's the off season and it fills a void, but it's like filling a void with a void and that void is filled with fabrications. It's all quite odd to me.

Yea that sounds fair. It's just a general tone I've observed really, seems only idiots ever want additions because our team (of on going additions!) wins trophies.
 
I never said you were blaming anyone. Read my post.

My issue with you is for opening a thread about 'blaming Moyes for transfers' and inventing your own 'theory' on the inner workings of the club.

No, your problem is the idea of people blaming David Moyes before the window is finished, as you've said repeatedly. Don't go moving the goalposts about now just because you - like so many others - read what you want to read and then had it pointed out to you that you've got the wrong end of the stick.
My point remains. This 'blame' thread is a load of bollox. Blame who for what exactly? Blame some one in or around United that they haven't fulfilled the Fifa/FM brigades muppet wet dreams. Read the post again.
Don't have any problem reading. The opening post starts from a ridiculous place - blame. And whats more its badly written.

Obivisouly you like the general thrust of the topic - blame.

Amazing that the word blame is even part of the narrative. Amazing.
But the general thrust of the your opening post is about 'who should we blame', even if your conclusion is no-one, which I have to be honest I'm not 100% clear on, you have opened up a thread about 'blame'.
Not embarassed by everyone. But am embarassed that we have a thread titled 'Blaming Moyes for transfers' BEFORE the window closes.
See?

What makes me laugh is the condescending reds always having a pop at 'spotty FM playing teenagers' for wanting top quality signings, while they try out this concept of 'supporting our successful team' seem to forget that the current team they are supporting are a bunch of previous big money signings.

Our players generally came here in the same way others want us to continue strengthening. Signings, particularly that of very good players, is a good thing for the team. Signings are the team.

Once upon a time, Persie was a 'shiny new toy' being lusted over by muppets (while the couture fans chose to not get involved and talk about how Rooney/Welbeck would be affected instead), but now he is a key part of the team, just as any new signing would be.

I will never get the bickering and competitiveness of transfer forum opinion.


People like new signings because they get excited by the idea of new players and how they'll fit into the team. It's about the buzz. It's what makes spending so much time reading about transfers worthwhile.

I see that as an entirely separate issue to people wanting us to solve the midfield problem and continue strengthening the side.
 
Well for a start I'm not wrongly hassling someone for something they didn't say.

I'm not hasslling anyone wrongly. At no point have I told Brwned he is right or wrong. If you could read instead of reacting you'd realise that.
I'm merely pointing out they have invented a theory about the inner workings of the club and titled a thread in a deliberately provocative manner. Last time I looked this was a discussion forum. Folks post. Folks reply. If my perfectly legitimate challenge to they OP is 'hassle' then, wow. Just wow.
 
I'm not hasslling anyone wrongly. At no point have I told Brwned he is right or wrong. If you could read instead of reacting you'd realise that.
I'm merely pointing out they have invented a theory about the inner workings of the club and titled a thread in a deliberately provocative manner. Last time I looked this was a discussion forum. Folks post. Folks reply. If my perfectly legitimate challenge to they OP is 'hassle' then, wow. Just wow.


If I could read? Sweet baby Jesus.

You were spouting about him laying blame when he was doing the opposite.

My point remains. This 'blame' thread is a load of bollox. Blame who for what exactly? Blame some one in or around United that they haven't fulfilled the Fifa/FM brigades muppet wet dreams. Read the post again.

The jist of your opening gambit seems to be about 'blaming' Fergie.

The opening post starts from a ridiculous place - blame. And whats more its badly written.

Obivisouly you like the general thrust of the topic - blame.

Amazing that the word blame is even part of the narrative. Amazing.

there's a few more like that and then this beauty

I never said you were blaming anyone.
 
Fair enough. I'm personally not convinced that he isn't allowed to work from his own list as opposed to Fergie's.

For a start, Fergie's list probably didn't have any midfielders on it.


I just don't see how he could have a list when the players he was scouting for Everton aren't relevant to the ones he'll want to scout for United, and he's simply not had time to scout his own players for us.

He might well have been looking at midfielders in a class above - like Thiago and Fábregas - and decided that it's them or nothing, but we do know he was looking to add players there too.

“But we do have an issue in central midfield, there is no doubt about that because getting a Scholes or a Carrick is very difficult these days."
 
No, your problem is the idea of people blaming David Moyes before the window is finished, as you've said repeatedly. Don't go moving the goalposts about now just because you - like so many others - read what you want to read and then had it pointed out to you that you've got the wrong end of the stick.
See?




People like new signings because they get excited by the idea of new players and how they'll fit into the team. It's about the buzz. It's what makes spending so much time reading about transfers worthwhile.

I see that as an entirely separate issue to people wanting us to solve the midfield problem and continue strengthening the side.

None of that suggests I have jumped to Moyes defence.

For the last time, in simple English for you and Moses:


1. I'm embarassed by the title of your thread
2. You have invented a theory about the inner workings of the clubs transfer policies
3. The core topic - blame - is completely ridiculous given we are mid-window - how can we 'blame' anyone for anything?


Clear? You've gone to great lengths to try and push back on all of these points but perhaps that is because the whole opening thrust of this thread is to say the very least, flawed.
 
People like new signings because they get excited by the idea of new players and how they'll fit into the team. It's about the buzz. It's what makes spending so much time reading about transfers worthwhile.

I see that as an entirely separate issue to people wanting us to solve the midfield problem and continue strengthening the side.

Well that further strengthens the notion that transfer forum residents are clowns (and likely teenagers) who know little about the game, wheras the United forum gang, for want of a better expression, are the ones who are concerned with the needs of the team.

Personally, whilst I agree it is exciting to sign quality players, I think most of the talk and hypothetical formations have been about how we can improve the midfield, and perhaps potentially replace Rooney.

I also think we all, probably yourself included, get excited at the prospect of quality additions. My guess is you didn't just shrug your shoulders and move on when we got Persie, despite the informed concensus being 'we don't need a striker'.
 
I just don't see how he could have a list when the players he was scouting for Everton aren't relevant to the ones he'll want to scout for United, and he's simply not had time to scout his own players for us.

He might well have been looking at midfielders in a class above - like Thiago and Fábregas - and decided that it's them or nothing, but we do know he was looking to add players there too.

He's a football man. It would not suprise me if he had great knowledge of the world's best midfielders.

Worth remembering that even as an Everton coach, he probably regularly watched the best for tactical analysis etc. Look how many mini Barcelonas are out there now. I'm sure Martinez, Rogers and Laudrup studied Barca in great depth, even if the plan was to implement with far lesser players.
 
Eddie Woodward has to take fair share of the blame for this summer transfer disaster, i could be wrong but Moyes would identify the player and pass onto Eddie to do the deal, so for me he is responsible for Cesc public bid and the recent Fellaini/Baines bids.

Also, telling the whole world that he was flying back to the UK for urgent transfer business was nothing short of a PR disaster....why would you publicise that unless you knew the deal was for a top top player and we were on the verge of signing him, with nothing coming out of it this made Eddie/Moyes look naive and foolish.
 
He's a football man. It would not suprise me if he had great knowledge of the world's best midfielders.

Worth remembering that even as an Everton coach, he probably regularly watched the best for tactical analysis etc. Look how many mini Barcelonas are out there now. I'm sure Martinez, Rogers and Laudrup studied Barca in great depth, even if the plan was to implement with far lesser players.


Agreed, but United is a special case, I'm not a full handover was possible. Which as Brwned says, was possibly why Moyes was chosen.
 
Absolutely impossible as usual to know what's going on, who's deciding what and what our policy is. Despite that, I think it's fair to say that the previous regime is responsible for our midfield situation.
 
The one problem is that we seem to have a very small list of possibilities, mostly related to the PL - either in the present or the past. Hard to actually blame Moyes for it. He needs to look at players he's buying and he's been looking at a different standard of player for years and years. He can't suddenly scout and follow players he hasn't before, and decide to sign him or them within months, especially as they haven't played at all for most of that time. It's a learning curve and we have to accept it will take a bit of time until he's fully clued up regarding players fitting the top level, the ones who can make the step up at United as others have done before. Until then he seems to be going with what he knows. It's definitely been a problem and has played a big part in our struggle this summer. Hopefully, a temporary one.
 
It's definitely been a problem and has played a big part in our struggle this summer. Hopefully, a temporary one.


Is our struggle this summer not like our struggle in other summers though?

The only difference I can see was the public pursuit of Fabregas.
 
The title was the subject, and was neutral, his actual opinion was in the smaller words underneath. I think that's allowed.