ICC T20 World Cup 2022

I don't think you watch Indian cricket regularly so you don't know what you are talking about. Our bowling is like this only. They require assistance from pitch or conditions to be threatening. Only bowler we have who does well on flat wickets is Bumrah. Indian team management already knows the same, hence why under performance by top order batsmen is the real issue. All folks who watch Indian cricket realise the same, yet you think you know better.
Tbf it’s difficult for me to take your opinion seriously when you’re calling it a par 200.
 
TBF, Sehwag was fantastic to watch. But yes I get your point.

India basically have IPL and so many players to choose from. They really should never have problems finding opening batsman to score in t20.

The problem is, India are rewarding the wrong sort of attitude from the batsman they're developing in the IPL as well. The Indian players coming through in the IPL (with some exceptions), play selfishly for their averages. As that's what gets them selected for the national team.
 
This is fantastic to watch from England. Beautiful shots. Cruising to this. This score was always a low total despite what some on here tried to say.

The problem is, India are rewarding the wrong sort of attitude from the batsman they're developing in the IPL as well. The Indian players coming through in the IPL (with some exceptions), play selfishly for their averages. As that's what gets them selected for the national team.
The whole selection thing for India has always been bizarre.
 
Do you recall if Dravid was a strong willed captain?

There was this incident where he declared before Sachin could get a 200 at SCG. Plus that Chappel Ganguly stuff happened in his captaincy stint. We also won a test series in England under him. My guess is that he is just a traditionalist. He will back senior players rather than overhaul things. Wrong choice at this moment in our history. We are brimming with exciting young talent and need to clear out the current limited overs' squad of oldies.
 
That sound of bat against ball when its hit for a six is beautiful.
 
Again, a Pakistani batting implosion aside, this score is about 20 runs below par and should be chased down.

If I were a betting man, I'd put in a cheeky tenner on Pak winning this with all wickets in hand.

The only demons in the pitch seem to be of NZ's making. You need more pyrotechnics at this level, and Pakistan will be providing them.

I expect something similar to NZ's shortcomings tomorrow with the slow, self-indulgent approach that India bring till late game Kohli/SKY show up.

---

Repeat of yesterday's template. This is a 180-200 pitch, and Rohit is at 90.0 after 25 balls. We're not explosive enough for the occasion, and it'll cost us.

27/28 is too much pressure on the rest of the side. SKY can't bail us out every time. Someone else needs to take t up the burden. Let's hope it's Kohli with him.

And that's the game. Rohit and Rahul have let their team and country down. I'm furious. We all knew this was coming, and did nothing about it.

Just like yesterday:
- 20-30 runs short
- the captain plays an ODI, wastes six overs at a run a ball
- the most powerful hitters are put under too much pressure to accelerate in the middle
- a non-embarrassing total is achieved through shots at the end

Just like yesterday, an English implosion aside, this is a straightforward chase in a semi-final.

Questions need to be asked of Indian selection and tactics in yet another ICC tournament where we've underperformed.

If I were a betting man, I'd put a cheeky tenner on Eng chasing this down with ten wickets to spare.

I'm not the only one who saw this coming, though.
 
TBF, Sehwag was fantastic to watch. But yes I get your point.

India basically have IPL and so many players to choose from. They really should never have problems finding opening batsman to score in t20.

I think we are over-rated like England in football often, because we have the money

The IPL doesn't have as many international class players as people in this thread think. Ishan was tried and failed. Many of the same guys - like KL - are IPL stars.

We can select better players, but it's not like we have a reserve of world beaters. They would do OK only.
 
17 off the over when England only need six of an over now. They want this done ASAP.
 
Tbf it’s difficult for me to take your opinion seriously when you’re calling it a par 200.

Everyone say the same after England win in 15/16 overs so get ready for it. Not sure why you think it is controversial, even likes of Moody, Fleming said on cricinfo that 180+ was the minimum score required here.
 
I think we are over-rated like England in football often, because we have the money

The IPL doesn't have as many international class players as people in this thread think. Ishan was tried and failed. Many of the same guys - like KL - are IPL stars.

We can select better players, but it's not like we have a reserve of world beaters. They would do OK only.
OK for the opening partnership would be better than what happened today :lol:
 
My unpopular opinion for this thread is that selecting Kohli didn't help us as many seem to think. I think Surya at 3 was our best option. In all his innings, he's 30 off 27 or so, and that dictates how the rest of the team plays. Simply getting Surya at 3 gets you a different game trajectory. Both Kohli and Rahul do lots of self-rescue acts near the end of their own innings which covers their bad performance.
 
Everyone say the same after England win in 15/16 overs so get ready for it. Not sure why you think it is controversial, even likes of Moody, Fleming said on cricinfo that 180+ was the minimum score required here.
Literally 5 of the pundits on commentary have mentioned india got a par score on this ground. They’ve played top level international cricket. Yet I should listen to a guy on redcafe who says par is 200.

The par is clearly not enough because of factors such as the opponent they are playing are the best in the world and the bowling performance from India has been abysmal. It doesn’t change the fact it was a par score regardless of whether it was enough.
 
My unpopular opinion for this thread is that selecting Kohli didn't help us as many seem to think. I think Surya at 3 was our best option. In all his innings, he's 30 off 27 or so, and that dictates how the rest of the team plays. Simply getting Surya at 3 gets you a different game trajectory. Both Kohli and Rahul do lots of self-rescue acts near the end of their own innings which covers their bad performance.
Kinda agree. I'd have opened with Kohli even.
 
Simply terrific from England - they're going to win the cup
 
My unpopular opinion for this thread is that selecting Kohli didn't help us as many seem to think. I think Surya at 3 was our best option. In all his innings, he's 30 off 27 or so, and that dictates how the rest of the team plays. Simply getting Surya at 3 gets you a different game trajectory. Both Kohli and Rahul do lots of self-rescue acts near the end of their own innings which covers their bad performance.

To be fair Kohli has been in great form before this so you wouldn't have changed the order. Yadav has also been but can't see Kohli giving that spot up. The issue seems to be the lack of intent from the openers which leaves the middle order to much to do.
 
Dropped catch goes for four :lol:

Literally 5 of the pundits on commentary have mentioned india got a par score on this ground. They’ve played top level international cricket. Yet I should listen to a guy on redcafe who says par is 200.

The par is clearly not enough because of factors such as the opponent they are playing are the best in the world and the bowling performance from India has been abysmal. It doesn’t change the fact it was a par score regardless of whether it was enough.
They actually said par score on this ground but not a winning total for today. Not just due to opponents in hindsight but based on conditions. They are well short of a target for having any chance to win.
I think thats the difference.
 
India have been poor. With their PP and then their start with their bowling.

But this is such a fantastic performance by England with the bat. These two attacked the PP, and then just kept things going.
 
I think we are over-rated like England in football often, because we have the money

The IPL doesn't have as many international class players as people in this thread think. Ishan was tried and failed. Many of the same guys - like KL - are IPL stars.

We can select better players, but it's not like we have a reserve of world beaters. They would do OK only.

Don't agree. In 2019 WC, our team along with Eng was the best on paper. Likes of Rohit, Dhawan, Kohli, Bumrah, Shami at their peak. That semi final defeat against NZ was a huge missed opportunity. 2016 T20 WC at home, we messed up due to a bad opening pair. We make small mistakes in these tournaments though last two T20 WCs have been selection failures.

Currently we have talents like Surya, Hardik, Bumrah, Jadeja, Pant. That is a very strong core already. We just fail to plan properly with tough decisions.
 
Maybe indian fans knew a thing or two about their side.

England have been brilliant.