MDFC Manager
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2005
- Messages
- 25,901
More proof on display that we can't chase/score 180+ against a good side.
Yea I don't think that was out either. The bails didn't look to be going downThat DK dismissal looked pretty sus.
As someone who wants DK to be dropped, I don’t mind it but still.
Bangladesh win this on D/L if the rain doesn't stop.
Can that mean curtains for India if Pak beat SA tomorrow?
Got to feel a bit for Bangladesh here - being ahead on D/L of it continued to rain then receiving a far tougher target off remaining overs. Hopefully an exciting finish!
.
Got to feel a bit for Bangladesh here - being ahead on D/L of it continued to rain then receiving a far tougher target off remaining overs. Hopefully an exciting finish!
Huh? They got the exact same required run rate before and after the rain. It's gotten easier with the number of runs required actually going down.They've been hard done by.
Yeah I think you would rather want to go 9 per over for 6 overs rather than 10 overs.Huh? They got the exact same required run rate before and after the rain. It's gotten easier with the number of runs required actually going down.
It’s really played into India’s hands, feel massively for them on what was shaping up to be a massive moment.Got to feel a bit for Bangladesh here - being ahead on D/L of it continued to rain then receiving a far tougher target off remaining overs. Hopefully an exciting finish!
Exactly. It’s always easier when the overs get reduced for the chasing team. Especially because you are still allowed to use the full 10 wickets.Huh? They got the exact same required run rate before and after the rain. It's gotten easier with the number of runs required actually going down.
Huh? They got the exact same required run rate before and after the rain. It's gotten easier with the number of runs required actually going down.
Exactly. It’s always easier when the overs get reduced for the chasing team. Especially because you are still allowed to use the full 10 wickets.
I think DL method needs to introduce reduced wickets remaining as well to make it fairer.
It’s honestly not easier.Nah, so much of T20 relies on momentum and that break massively disrupted in India's favour. Having more overs to play with allows batting team a bum-over too, there's no space for that now.
That’s already the case. Reduced overs mean each bowlers allowed overs gets reduced.Could the same be argued over how many overs a bowler can bowl? (This might already be the case, in which case you could have a point - although would make for less exciting finishes potentially).
Then he slips twice on the wet pitch and he’s run outDas was taking the game away from India.
Then he slips twice on the wet pitch and he’s run out
Yeah huge over in the context. Could just be the match winning over.That was a big over. 2 wickets and 2 runs only.
For some reason I think you’re right.It's utterly ridiculous. Let's be honest the game wouldn't have restarted had India been ahead.
Conspiracy!!!!!!!It's utterly ridiculous. Let's be honest the game wouldn't have restarted had India been ahead.
Absolutely stupid succession of shots. Smart batting would be to push the ball along the ground and get it wet.They lost momentum but some really bad forced shots.
It's utterly ridiculous. Let's be honest the game wouldn't have restarted had India been ahead.
Yep, they just needed to keep things ticking. With the way the field is, it would zip along and be more difficult to field than just shots into the air time and time again. They had a full list of wickets as well. The run out was obviously big but again, unforced error.Absolutely stupid succession of shots. Smart batting would be to push the ball along the ground and get it wet.
Yep, they just needed to keep things ticking. With the way the field is, it would zip along and be more difficult to field than just shots into the air time and time again. They had a full list of wickets as well. The run out was obviously big but again, unforced error.