I've been told to drop now, so I will.
I'm most certainly not a racist, nor do I believe this opinion to be so. In fact, I started to think about this when, I read an article on the subject by Micheal Atherton.
I mentioned Archer because the ECB changed the qualifying system before the world cup to fast-trackk him. He's just bowled the winning over, so it was relevant. However, I accpect it's a debate for another time. And it was a debate many were having before the tournament.
Since you mention him, I think what Morgen did was wrong as well. Stokes, I have no issue with because he come over here as a young teen and learnt his cricket. The best comparison I can think of is KP. He is a player who in my view should not have played cricket for England. He come over here at 19, and already had his technique formed in South Arfica. He should have played for SA.
Hope that helps clear up my views on the subject.