Djemba-Djemba
Full Member
Yes!
Plunkett!
Plunkett!
They've decided it's good enough to be a second opinion. That's very different to deciding it's good enough to be the only decision maker.
I'm not sure. What exactly is the tech better at and by how much, is the question that is relevant, surely?What exactly is an umpire better at at recognizing in cricket than the tech?
Exactly how I remember it. South Africa, Pakistan had better rounded, in form teams. Warne was devastating in SF and FinalsOz team in 99 was good but in bad form. Their Openers - Waugh and Gilchrist were in bad form similar to NZ's. IIRC they were rescued multiple times by Steve and Bevan with Moody also doing welll in some games. Shane Warne pretty much won them the semis and finals though or at least have them a major opening in both games.
Takes ages to prepare the data for Hawkeye, if you were doing it for every shout (which you'd have to) the game would take forever.
I think the review system generally works quite well, especially now you don't lose reviews for umpires call, but I'd be open to them trialling two reviews. Both the situations in this game and in the semi have at least partially been caused by the players making as bad decisions as the umpires.
So 10 overs left.
What do we reckon?
Which team will be happier? Both pretty content at this point?
I'm not sure. What exactly is the tech better at and by how much, is the question that is relevant, surely?
Sounds I agree with. It gets dodgy on the predictive stuff about where the ball is going after hitting a pad.It’s better at accurately picking up sounds, and where it comes from. It’s much better at assessing where the ball is going in an LBW situation, as we’ve seen in this match.
So 10 overs left.
What do we reckon?
Which team will be happier? Both pretty content at this point?
So 10 overs left.
What do we reckon?
Which team will be happier? Both pretty content at this point?
NZ to score 400+ and win by 250 runs.So 10 overs left.
What do we reckon?
Which team will be happier? Both pretty content at this point?
You've got to be kidding. England dominating proceedings here by a margin. If NZ don't pull a rabbit out of the hat here, Roy will finish the 2nd innings in 30 overs himself.
What's your allegiance? I've not clocked it yet.Archer with 5 overs left. Would be brilliant if NZ crossed 230-240 from here.
Gosh, how did New Zealand make this final? England should win this at a canter.
Gosh, how did New Zealand make this final? England should win this at a canter.
I think it's about as likely that England will chase these in 30 overs as it is that NZ will skittle us.I think NZ will be very pleased to be 200 up with 5 wickets spare and 5 overs to open their shoulders. They’re a good fielding side who will put up a solid defence.
I think NZ will be very pleased to be 200 up with 5 wickets spare and 5 overs to open their shoulders. They’re a good fielding side who will put up a solid defence.
I think it's about as likely that England will chase these in 30 overs as it is that NZ will skittle us.
Considering he's made of glass it's a minor miracle that Wood's gotten injured after he's bowled his full allocation in the final.
With a score of 250 you have to attack and take wickets, not defend.