Never underestimate an Australian tail.
Survive the first 10 overs and you lot will be fine. India and Aus both failed in the first 10 overs. Even 20-0 in first 10 would be decent.Still looks a good pitch to bat on.
It's just about holding our nerves.
Survive the first 10 overs and you lot will be fine. India and Aus both failed in the first 10 overs. Even 20-0 in first 10 would be decent.
That won't happen with these England openers, they will attack no matter what.Survive the first 10 overs and you lot will be fine. India and Aus both failed in the first 10 overs. Even 20-0 in first 10 would be decent.
That won't happen with these England openers, they will attack no matter what.
Looked close in real time...
Like @Djemba-Djemba says easier said than done. But you are right you also do not want opponents to just dominate you. You must take some risks.As they should. The last thing you want is the opposition getting on top of you.
Play your natural game.
I don't watch much cricket, can someone explain what just happened there. Why isn't it an LBW? Did it hit the bat?
Because the umpire thought it was going to bounce over the top of the stumps.
England reviewed the decision, but although the technology indicated the it would have hit the stumps, it was marginal enough that we stick with the original decision of the umpire (umpires call).
Wait what? Because it’s marginal we stick with the umpires call? What is the point of that?
Ah fair. But then you could argue against hawk eye and goal line technology, when the margins are so small.Margin of error in the technology.
Really impressed with the bowling and fielding effort today. I think they are a minimum of 50 short.
Early wicket and the whole country will be terrified still
Straight beween Smiths legs
It's coming home.
So much for Australia showing us how to recover from early wickets
Excellent bowling performance, though it's worth remembering we've been bowled out for less than that twice already this tournament.
Plenty of scope for us to throw it all away.
I’m not sure that’s true. The technology is always going to be more accurate than the human. I think the idea was to keep an amount of authority with the on field.Margin of error in the technology.
224 to win. I'd have bitten your hand off for that when Australia won the toss.