Devil_forever
You're only young once, you can be immature f'ever
By the time he goes for 24 mill he will be virtually 30 though
Not young for a player over 20 mill
That's just a formality, they're getting him now, he's 28, in his prime.
By the time he goes for 24 mill he will be virtually 30 though
Not young for a player over 20 mill
doesn't that leave barca a bit short of forward selling Henry and Ibrahimovic and only Villa coming in?
If Villa gets injured, can they really expect young Bojan to step up (as well as someone of Ibra's caliber would)? It could prove very costly for them. If they did just want to get rid of him, do you really believe that 24 million euros is the best they could have got for him? Not a chance imo. Hence why I think there's a real possibility of a loan fee also being applicable.
Weren't there reports earlier of a loan fee as well? I just can't believe that there wouldn't be a queue of top teams prepared to pay that same fee for Ibrahimovic. That is literally peanuts, Barca weren't that desperate to get rid of him, surely?! Is the fee worth losing some real quality from your squad?
doesn't that leave barca a bit short of forward selling Henry and Ibrahimovic and only Villa coming in?
cant find any source that says Milan pay 20 mil for loan and 24 for later to sign him. All news i see that milan just pay 24 million after a year
40 mm transfer fee, plus a total gross cost of 20mm a year in salary..
Milan is proposing those terms and have agreed with Barca, the problem is Ibra.
They have asked him to lower is salary, but he has taken 24 hours to decide.
It will get done.
(all figures in EUR)
Basically 40 mill to Barca (payable in three years, 15-15-10) and 8 - 8.5MM net to Ibra for 4 years (which works out to 16-17 gross p.a.) Milan is looking to get rid of Huntelaar for 13 (saving 5MM in salaries) and Flamini for 8-9MM (saving 3.5MM in salaries) so to clear room for Ibra.
(all in EUR)
It's still a lot of money though (Marcotti is reporting something like €15m loan fee + obligated €40m transfer fee next season). €55m (~£45m) is a load of money and Milan could easily buy 3-4 players for that amount of money to fix other areas of their squad that need much more work. This deal is far too short-term for Milan, who need medium- and long-term fixes.
Even the Barca papers like Sport are only talking about a 24m fee.
The thing that seems to be happening is that Barca won't officially be subsidising his wages or paying him a "loyalty bonus" for him leaving. The fee has been set low enough to allow Milan to afford to cover his personal terms - at least, that's what the Spanish press are assuming.
Zlatan and Guardiola could not continue at the same club, they didn't even talk to each other so there was no other solution than to leave for Z.
I realise that these were all just "reports" but I can't see such a huge cut in the total transfer fee. I can't see Barca selling for the fee that's now been quoted, for reasons I've already explained.
Instead of making such allowances, wouldn't Barca have been better off just looking for another suitor?
He will win the league by himself
He will win the league by himself
I guess the logic here is that I believe Zlatan signed a five year contract when he joined Barcelona, he was Europe best paid player at Inter, and I think he kept the wages. If he had four years left, that would be over somewhere £32m to his pockets the next four years... I bet they concluded the best deal for would be to cut their losses, and save that wages as well as getting €24m in the process. They sold him to avoid a "Bogarde", even thus such a scenario would be unlikeley. Barcelona is rumored to have quite a debt as well... I bet they will swich unicef with a paying sponsor sooner rather than later.
At the end of the day it makes sense to be quite honest. Because we are talking less than 10 clubs able to pay such a wages, and even fewer when Zlatan excluded England as a option earlier this summer.
You think switching from no sponsor to a paid sponsor would cause more drama than ditching UNICEF for a commercial deal? Seriously?
In a shite like Serie A he can score 30 goals, last time he made 27 or 28, and he won the league by himself (more than once)
Exposed at the highest level, so slithering back to the safety of Serie A. I imagine he'll score some fantastic goals against Cagliari, and the usual suspects will once again endure friction burns on their cocks.
Ronaldinho Ibrahimovic Pato
Ambrosini Pirlo Boateng
Antonini T.Silva Nesta Papastathopoulos
Amelia
Flamini is still there. All they need in midfield is legs to do the dirty work for Pirlo.Midfield's the problem. Ambrosini's always been below the top level, Pirlo's legs have gone and Boateng's a brainless glory-hunter......
I didn't then and I still don't understand the Ibra-Eto'o switch. Did Eto'o want out?
They've got a nice looking team. Nesta needs to stay healthy, although it looks like that Greek lad could cover about three positions with that name.