same here. It's a news for me.As someone who is not from UK I didn't know the "rent boys" insult was related to homophobia at all, I though it meant Chelsea is full of mercenaries and no loyal players who actually support the team and play for the badge...
Can you give a more concrete example? I like to think that if my company asked me to support a cause I was opposed to, then I would stand up and not support it. But at the same time, I can't imagine that the cause that I so strongly oppose is the support of a minority group...
This is not true. You are a mod and you've a responsiblity to do better than to post nonsense.It's absolute bollocks. Hide behind 'religious reasons' all you want but those religious reasons basically say they don't believe gay people should be allowed to exist. If your religion excludes part of a population purely because of who they choose to love (which has zero affect on you whatsoever) then it's a pile of crap argument imo but that's a discussion for a non football thread.
Well they think it's a sin and shouldn't ever happen, and in some countries you get the death penalty. So in what regard to they expect these people to live their lives?This is not true. You are a mod and you've a responsiblity to do better than to post nonsense.
No idea what Jesus has to do with a rainbow armband but at least Guehi actually wore it. The FA are likely going to punish him for that but they are totally fine with a player refusing to wear it and not offering his own explanation for doing so. It's no wonder racism and homophobia is still rife in football. The campaigns are meaningless. There's no real conversations around the issues.
Why would he face FA action for writing that he loves another man on a pro-gay armband?
Also, his name sounds like gay.
The Laws of the Game allow "initiative slogans/emblems promoting the game of football, respect and integrity," such as Rainbow Laces, but forbid "political, religious or personal slogans, statements or images.
Why would he face FA action for writing that he loves another man on a pro-gay armband?
Also, his name sounds like gay.
He has had "I love Jesus" written on his boots for years as far as I know. Quite a few players do and I don't think they've ever got into trouble.
Obviously a bit different to writing on the rainbow laces armbands.
Dearie me.That's a very superficial vision of religion. Maybe it's not more than that for you, but for a lot of people it is way more than just something they decided to follow arbitraly. You should educate yourself before saying something like that.
And, in fact, homosexual practice is an option. There are people who have a natural tendency towards gambling, alcoholism, etc. Many of them do not give in to their addiction, or at least try not to.
Anyway, the armband is a very bad idea, which seem made to cause this kind of embarrassment, in a league that receive players from all the cultures, including muslims countries. I do not think PL has to stop defending whatever they believe because of foreigners, but it's unnecessary to force individuals to wear that.
No idea what Jesus has to do with a rainbow armband but at least Guehi actually wore it. The FA are likely going to punish him for that but they are totally fine with a player refusing to wear it and not offering his own explanation for doing so. It's no wonder racism and homophobia is still rife in football. The campaigns are meaningless. There's no real conversations around the issues.
He has had "I love Jesus" written on his boots for years as far as I know. Quite a few players do and I don't think they've ever got into trouble.
Obviously a bit different to writing on the rainbow laces armbands.
No idea what Jesus has to do with a rainbow armband but at least Guehi actually wore it. The FA are likely going to punish him for that but they are totally fine with a player refusing to wear it and not offering his own explanation for doing so. It's no wonder racism and homophobia is still rife in football. The campaigns are meaningless. There's no real conversations around the issues.
Which is why a defender might love him.Weird. Jesus isn't even that good of a player.
Which is why a defender might love him.
Amen to that.Christians who work every sabbath can STFU about their old testament anti-gay stuff as well.
The Premier League is run by Kants.It's a bit odd that you can get reprimanded for wearing the armband and adding your support for your religion but don't get reprimanded for not wearing the armband due to support of your religion.
I get it, and it would have been much easier for him to just wear it and get on with it but, what would you do if for example, your place of work was doing something similar for something that you personally are politically or morally opposed to? Which effected another minority group. Would you show support for the cause or would you say... Sorry, its not something I'm onboard with so count me out.
All im saying is there is no right or wrong thing to do in my opinion. If someone wants to show support, great. If not, its a shame but its your choice.
This is nitpicking. Someone else also said that above; that these religions don't forbid people to be homosexual, just to have actual homosexual relationships. But that's a ridiculous distinction; it basically comes down to the same thing: you can't be homosexual and true to yourself. You can care about this distinction all you want, but the end result is still a repression of homosexual people and thus homophobia.I disagree that Muslims believe gays shouldn’t exists. It’s the act that’s viewed as a sin not the actual feeling/being.
Yeah, I don't get that. He wears the band, isn't that enough? It's not like he wrote 'just to be clear, I actually do hate gays'.It's a bit odd that you can get reprimanded for wearing the armband and adding your support for your religion but don't get reprimanded for not wearing the armband due to support of your religion.
"It's fine to be a footballer, but you better not play any football."I disagree that Muslims believe gays shouldn’t exists. It’s the act that’s viewed as a sin not the actual feeling/being.
No idea what Jesus has to do with a rainbow armband but at least Guehi actually wore it. The FA are likely going to punish him for that but they are totally fine with a player refusing to wear it and not offering his own explanation for doing so. It's no wonder racism and homophobia is still rife in football. The campaigns are meaningless. There's no real conversations around the issues.
Probably not. Apart that it seems a bit of a niche idea: players from a religious community can be receive a lot of questions/criticism from their family and friends about this. There was an article on a Dutch player last year or so, where they went into the detail of his decision-making (I think because he eventually didn't wear it). So it's not just a personal one-off choice, there's social context and pressure. And therefore I would rather interpret this as saying something like, 'I support/go along with the activity and that doesn't mean I'm not a Christian anymore'.The rainbow originally was a message from god promising never to flood the earth again, that’s what Jesus has to do with it.
Many catholics/christians feel the rainbow has been taken and perverted using something that they generally don’t agree with.
No idea what Jesus has to do with a rainbow armband but at least Guehi actually wore it. The FA are likely going to punish him for that but they are totally fine with a player refusing to wear it and not offering his own explanation for doing so. It's no wonder racism and homophobia is still rife in football. The campaigns are meaningless. There's no real conversations around the issues.
He walks on water, mate.Weird. Jesus isn't even that good of a player.
The rainbow originally was a message from god promising never to flood the earth again, that’s what Jesus has to do with it.
Many catholics/christians feel the rainbow has been taken and perverted using something that they generally don’t agree with.
No idea what Jesus has to do with a rainbow armband but at least Guehi actually wore it. The FA are likely going to punish him for that but they are totally fine with a player refusing to wear it and not offering his own explanation for doing so. It's no wonder racism and homophobia is still rife in football. The campaigns are meaningless. There's no real conversations around the issues.
It’s also hypocritical to decide for him how he must practice his religion when you also don’t want to be told how to behave in your own life. Personally I don’t care much for any religion but I think freedom of religion or association should be respected as long as it doesn’t affect the next person.People are very fairly pointing out how incredibly hypocritic it is to pick and choose what you follow from your religious book of choice.
No idea what Jesus has to do with a rainbow armband but at least Guehi actually wore it. The FA are likely going to punish him for that but they are totally fine with a player refusing to wear it and not offering his own explanation for doing so. It's no wonder racism and homophobia is still rife in football. The campaigns are meaningless. There's no real conversations around the issues.
It’s also hypocritical to decide for him how he must practice his religion when you also don’t want to be told how to behave in your own life. Personally I don’t care much for any religion but I think freedom of religion or association should be respected as long as it doesn’t affect the next person.
Ganging up on people who don’t want to participate frankly is turning this movements into dictators. The opposite of what their original intention of inclusivity .