Not at the cost of football and titles. Now we have become just a money driven club who doesn't care about the team, its players and the quality of football we play just profits.
He was the player of the year two seasons ago massively underpaid compared to clowns like lingard and strollers like pogba, the manager even kept him out of the team after that giving massive contract to a finished matic who didn't deserve his place over Herrera, this club penny pinched an year or more to extend his contract and give him a fair pay rise and a deal he deserved according to the work he puts and position in the dressing room. The board 's attitude was disgraceful against him and then they wouldn't give him a contract he deserves.
We won't even replace him and add to the depth and quality in depth in the transfer market this season sabotaging the team . What moral high ground can we take here.
Some idiotic rule of players over or near 30 applied without dealing it on player to player basis, completely a disaster on our part.
See, this narrative is moronic..that's as simple as I can put it.
Shall we dissect it then?
If as you say United are "A club completely driven by money", wouldn't winning titles mean... more money?
See, this is where the logic completely fails in the LUHG sort of fan.
Titles = profit! Titles = more sponsorship's! Titles = better players joining and in turn more success.
The foundations of the club currently are absolutely no different to when Ferguson was there with Gill, except with managers continually failing. Still have an accountant doing the job of CEO, so that hasn't changed except Woodward is creating revenue streams Gill wasn't able to and it allows the managers to spend incredibly sums of money.
He was offered a deal 2 years ago for at least 150k which would put him on par with arguably the leagues best defensive midfielder in Fernandinho. Fernandinho is absolutely vital to City's game, they miss him and they are not the same side and the club was willing to put him on par with that level of player and we've fools spouting the nonsense you have above.
Comparing Herrera to Pogba?
When Herrera signed he was an absolute nobody! He'd done absolutely nothing with his career. Hence he got sweet fa and he was a bit part player in almost every season bar one.
Vs
Pogba with 4 Italian league titles, 2 Italian cups, one of the worlds most sought after players in 2016 and then went on to win a world cup 2 years later.
There's a justified reason why there is salary differentials.
Lets look at it logically...
Herrera is 30 in 3 months and you demand the board pay him a minimum of 200k per week / €10.5M per annum and the rest (apps, goals bonus etc)... So it would cost us at least €40m over the course of a 4 year deal.
Is there an upside to Herrera? As in, is he miraculously going to turn into a world class performing midfielder that will lead us to league titles? At 30 he is only likely to decline, meaning we are stuck with yet another Sanchez type signing. An ageing, under performing and over paid player and guess what happens then?
Is there even resell value? NO! In a nutshell, its feckin woeful, woeful business, just like Sanchez was, just like Matic was too. Short term options in reality.
We get planks like you saying "iTS tHEm GLaZeRNomICs, iTs juST AbOUt PrOFiTs".