- Joined
- Nov 6, 2016
- Messages
- 214
Watford game was special. Young with his two goals opened up the game. Mkhi wouldve thrived in a game like that. Pogba was immense againts Arsenal. Im not taking away Lingards achievements. Lingard just kept running and things worked. Still Lingard should have scored a lot more.Sorry but that doesn't make any sense. How is Mourinho's football different from speeding counter attacks that you claim Mikhi is good at ? Everyone knows that Mourinho wants his team to move the ball forward fast and do quick lightning counter attacks.
No one can say Lingard is creative like Ozil but he thrived in our counter attacking system against Watford and Arsenal. Mourinho wanted Mikhi to link these counter attacks against Liverpool and Chelsea and he failed miserably. The problem then lies in only one person and that's Mikhi.
Please dont bring up Liverpool and Chelsea. Liverpool particularly where we defended with 11 players. How the feck Mkhi was supposed to counter by himself. He was probably instructed not to lose the ball while attacking at any chance, knowing that could create a potential Lethal counterattack.
Chelsea was a feck up. Kante and Hazard particularly totally overrun our midfield. Mkhi was not able to defend properly. Arsenal is not Chelsea, we know that. Lets see what happens on SUnday. We can discuss Lingard on Sunday afternoon. I will be very happy if he has a great game and brings us a desired win. That will mean that Lingard thrives in 352 and that I am wrong. I will be happy to be wrong.