Let's play devil's advocate: it's been 4 days since the market opened and yet teams who are already well oiled machines have already got key signings under their belt. Given we were playing catch up to the iterations just gone, is it prudent to bring players in later than numerous sides already ahead of us?
The fact deals are going through before the market even opened makes it clear that it isn't a great marker, but even if it was, the more settled the side, the farther into the window they can afford to conclude business. A side and club in absolute disarray need more time than everyone else to bed signings and try and get up to speed to even meet the bar to compete against teams they are already some distance behind.
Sure, but we can argue that those "well oiled" machines had easier targets.
Everyone knew that Haaland is going, it was just a matter of persuasion, and to be fair, City did have the upper hand.
Nunez was always going for that price......it's a no brainer.
Who else? Real got Tchouameni?
So, Haaland who we knew for a year was going, and two players for 100 mil? Not excatly great business from a price point of view.
If we could haggle Barca for De Jong that would be good business.
It's less than a month until the team leaves the UK. I think people just wanted this window to be smooth and slick, get players in and give them and us the best possible chance of doing well. I'm guessing we're about 2 weeks off training again, so ideally we want the vast majority together for that first session.
Less then a month is still a really long time.
We all want things to go smooth and slick, but when you're haggling it's not always smooth.
Bottom point is - we obviously have De Jong in the bag, it's just a matter of pricing him correctly.
The rest of the targets are probably bagged as well, just a matter of order in which we do business.
Probably De Jong, Antony, Timber.
And then maybe, and that's a big maybe - one more transfer for the right price.