if the propensity to commit crime and anti social behaviour, fly tipping etc was as high in the Muslim, Christian, Sikh, whatever population as it is with the travelling community then I’d have problem with them too.
Has political correctness actually gone mad?
- Thread starter Pogue Mahone
- Start date
if the propensity to commit crime and anti social behaviour, fly tipping etc was as high in the Muslim, Christian, Sikh, whatever population as it is with the travelling community then I’d have problem with them too.
Yes you do have a point re the police being unwilling or unable to do anything about it.
Perhaps it is a chicken and egg scenario where things have got like they are.
However, seeing a load of human excrement and used bog roll around where kids play and people walk their dogs does tend to piss you off.
They are a legally a different ethnicity and discrimination based on ethnicity is racism. It's wilful for people not to understand.
Understandably. I just think we have to think a bit deeper about this sort of issue - letting the government off the hook for poverty and crime can't be the right way to solve it.
Part of the problem is that they move on, so it's hard to convict.
I would say that travellers and gypsies are two different things in the UK, gypsies being romany and always nomadic and travellers being Irish folk who've shut down over the summer and travel round the UK. At least that's what I've gathered from talking to them.
It's not really the same thing though, as I've alluded to in my post.
The more I have thought about this in recent days, the more I have realised that what the whole debate about the Jimmy Carr joke overlooks is why it actually works, once you get any sense of the construction behind it. We should be asking why that line gets a laugh in our society.
It sounds like Jimmy's reflecting more on what it is okay to joke about. He's a shock magnet but he knows full well a joke about Jews isn't going to work. Ever. But gypsies? That's passable for... reasons. It's why the comedy works as a reminder about how we've deigned certain things more okay to joke about than others. The implicit message behind it I think being that none of these things should be okay to joke about.
Tbh I don't think the original joke is funny despite the laughs from the audience. His follow-up point is the best thing about the whole gag.
Tbh I don't think the original joke is funny despite the laughs from the audience. His follow-up point is the best thing about the whole gag.
Last edited:
Yup. Hence his follow up joke was about Jehovah’s witnesses and not any of the other (more aggressively protected) religions.
He'd get a laugh if the joke was about jews though I bet, with his delivery etc...
The shitstorm would be another level obviously.
If there's any silver lining (and I'm even horrified to use that term) then it's alerted the public just how extensive the Holocaust was in terms of its scope in addition to eliminating Jews entirely.
None of this excuses making jokes out of it, especially at the expense of any particular group over another.
| Jews | 5–6 million | [1] |
|---|---|---|
| Soviet civilians | 5.7 million (excl. 1.3 million Jews) | [2] |
| Soviet POWs | 2.8–3.3 million | [3] |
| Poles | 1.8–3 million | [4][5][6] |
| Serbs | 300,000–600,000 | [7][8] |
| Disabled people | 270,000 | [9] |
| Romani | 130,000–500,000 | [10][11] |
| Freemasons | 80,000–200,000 | [12][13] |
| Slovenes | 20,000–25,000 | [14] |
| Homosexuals | 5,000–15,000 | [15] |
| Spanish Republicans | 3,500 | [16] |
| Jehovah's Witnesses | 1,250–5,000 | [17] |
I’ve seen the figures for all those groups of people before but it’s a first for Freemasons! How did they upset the Nazis?
Yeah I was thinking the same thing- maybe they're normally lumped in with political prisoners/communists, which don't seem to be in the table. I guess most would be ethnic German?
Holocaust Memorial Day Trust:
The Nazis rejected Freemasonry, banning it in January 1934, partly because it was associated with Jews.
The secrecy associated with Masonic rituals has always made the organisation susceptible to conspiracy theories. The Nazis believed that the Freemasons were part of a conspiracy working against the interests of German nationalism. Criticism of Freemasons was a regular theme in Nazi propaganda – often framed in antisemitic discourse about the threat from ‘World Jewry’.
Thousands of Freemasons were persecuted by the Nazi regime and many were imprisoned in concentration camps, classed as political prisoners.
More early days of the persecutions? I had it in my head the political prisoners were rounded up first, then the Jewish and other targeted minorities, although my history degree was over 25 years ago now.
The propaganda was not exactly subtle, looking at it.
I would also argue there is a historic component, at least in Germany it's we are made pretty aware of how Jews and Travelers were caricatured by Nazi propaganda to have some very specific external characteristics, so essentially identifying them as being a different race. So yeah labeling prejudice against Jews and Travelers, at least from a historic standpoint, as racist, seems entirely justified.
His follow up isn't believable at all, imo and agree the joke wasn't even funny in the first place.
There's something quite pathetic about a man closing in on 50 using the words 'edgy as hell' to justify a joke like that.
Well, I’ve learnt something there.
Petition to change this devil
and his friends.https://www.lamag.com/culturefiles/was-there-really-an-adele-transphobia-controversy/
Probably could go in a few threads but here for now.
feck me, what’s the world gone to 
“Everyone should be able to identify as whatever they’re comfortable with and we need to be tolerant of that!!”
“I love being female”
”feck off!!”
“Everyone should be able to identify as whatever they’re comfortable with and we need to be tolerant of that!!”
“I love being female”
”feck off!!”
All of those articles literally just quoting the same one Twitter user.
Amazing stuff
Amazing stuff
I've seen a few reports that Adele sparked a controversy but find it hard to believe really
unless "controversy" means a few knobheads on twitter these days
unless "controversy" means a few knobheads on twitter these days
The fact that a woman saying ‘I love being a woman’ could offend anyone (on Twitter or otherwise) is mind bogglingly stupid.
Petition to change this devil
I'm not white and I always pick the yellow hand as well. Makes me feel like a Simpson.
I think they took offence at her comments being interpreted as a criticism of the awards being gender neutral for the first time.
No idea who “they” are, mind you. As @Tarrou said, probably just a few knobheads on Twitter. Although that seems to be all it takes to generate a load of headlines these days.
Petition to change this devil
Not often I see a tweet in this thread and think fair enough but fair enough. Hadn’t thought about the white being raceless thing. That’s a good point. Still think I might stick with yellow though.
Fair dos.
Yea there’s always going to be some weirdo on Twitter or online somewhere taking an issue with innocuous things (although it looks like this isn’t the case here going by entropy’s tweet).
I think the point is 'they' are almost entirely nobody. She said a thing. Nobody really minded.
Whilst we're on 'pretending something is a thing for the sake of a story' (by which I mean, whilst we're in this thread, I guess) I have been led to believe that the 'some academics argue' article cites one.
I also imagine we could find quite a few that would argue choosing the white ones could make us look a bit sus, as I would.
I also imagine we could find quite a few that would argue choosing the white ones could make us look a bit sus, as I would.
Yellow is the default hand colour on most messaging apps. Which is a good thing because nobody's skin is actually that hue. That makes it a bit of a leveller between different people.
So if a white guy went out of his way to deliberately pick a white skin hand to represent him, I think I'd probably be a bit afraid.
White people might have a lot of privelege. But giving me a white power thumbs up won't do anything to address that situation.
So if a white guy went out of his way to deliberately pick a white skin hand to represent him, I think I'd probably be a bit afraid.
White people might have a lot of privelege. But giving me a white power thumbs up won't do anything to address that situation.
Who is the hand just to the right of the white one supposed to represent?
I was contemplating which one I was meant to use as that one is probably the closest to my skin colour but am I claiming a multi-racial identity that I have no evidence for if I do?
North and East Asians?
Just found this absolutely terrifying mock up of racialised heart eyes emojis.
Careful now. I’ll cancel you so damn quick…
It’s a tough choice for me too. My maternal grandfather is unknown ethnicity and my skin tone is a good bit darker than the average white Irish man (my mum’s is even more so). Reckon bottom left would be closest.
Just found this absolutely terrifying mock up of racialised heart eyes emojis.
They look like a Bn - Jammie Dodger mash up.