Has political correctness actually gone mad?

Most Simpsons characters are lazy comedy, there's some great writing in there (aside from the recent series..) but the characters are hardly well rounded. Pretty much everybody is an example of a stereotype and designed to generate cheap laughs.

Not everything in comedy has to be clever, sometimes it can just be light hearted fun. I think somebody mentioned Manuel from Fawlty Towers earlier, a pretty nailed on example of a stereotype .. and it was funny to a lot of people. I don't think people are watching the likes of the Simpsons, Family Guy or South Park for their intellectually stimulating content. It's cheap laughs.

I found Apu pretty funny, so did a lot of people I'd guess. I also completely disagree that he was a 'tedious character' @Halftrack .. I actually thought he was pretty good and represented as being a genuinely good, family guy, and I enjoyed his episodes. I've even seen plenty of people from India coming out and saying they found the character funny and don't understand the backlash.

I just hope this isn't a sign of the future of comedy, I think this is what a lot of people are worried about. At what point do the likes of South Park also start coming under siege from those who see themselves as being the comedy crusaders?

Are you actually going to miss him being in the Simpsons when you watch it though?
 
Oh apparently they're not even actually getting rid of Apu and once again we might be arguing over nothing.
 
I don't doubt it. Point is that the entire cast of The Simpsons is stereotypes. This suits the medium of animation very well. For example, the size of Mickey Mouse's ears, Donald Duck's exaggerated crazy voice, Ike Brofloski's split head, etc

1980s stereotypes though. Its why the show seems so dated. They really should have just retired the show and come up with something new. Its why pretty much every other comedy show is more relevant. Bart Simpson is a 30-year old skateboarding 10 year old ffs you know?
 
I found Apu pretty funny, so did a lot of people I'd guess. I also completely disagree that he was a 'tedious character' @Halftrack .. I actually thought he was pretty good and represented as being a genuinely good, family guy, and I enjoyed his episodes. I've even seen plenty of people from India coming out and saying they found the character funny and don't understand the backlash.
Fair enough. To me, he was a character that worked better in small doses. Like the Janitor on Scrubs. Start focusing on him too much, and he becomes annoying (to me).
The Simpsons is shit, has been shit for a decade and does not deserve this level of furore.

If it were a mainstream post-watershed show like Family Guy or South Park facing this sort of nonsense it would be far more interesting.
Family Guy and South Park are aimed at more mature audiences, and are given a bit more leeway when it comes to playing around with stereotypes. I guess they've both attracted some controversy, but it usually dies down because the show is meant for people that are (or at least should be) smart enough to understand that you shouldn't try to emulate Cartman or Peter.

That being said, people who are huge fans of these shows are completely insufferable. They're the kind of people who are mad that they can't call people faggots.
 
:lol:

Oh my god you're perfect. I can't tell if this is ironic or not.

I'm genuinely surprised you didn't insert an apology for being white and for your ancestors crimes.

Why would it be ironic and why would he consider apologising for being white if it wasn't? Odd statement.

As for the apology thing there is a huge difference between a nation apologising for past actions e.g. Japan for actions in WW2 or Australia for the stolen generation and someone personally taking personal responsibility for historic events (which is a silly straw man at best).
 
Haven't seen any of the bold myself. And again the most "snowflake" protected character is the American WASP. Imagine if the Simpsons actually had a character mocking the midwest, ignorant American WASP stereotype and making fun of the protestant religion on a regular basis? The Fox News crowd would have gone berserk years ago. Actually that's probably why the Simpsons never had a character like that - they were a Fox show so its okay to make fun of Scots, Italians, rich guys but never, ever okay to make fun of the ignorant Anglo-Saxon Protestant

Yes, it would be great if they could, let's make up a random example, give the Simpsons an annoying, over-religious neighbour with stupid catchphrases who would be a staple at the local protestant church, and we could laugh at his ridiculous beliefs and how he has brainwashed his poor kids into believing how everything in the Bible should be taken literally. Then there could be a reverend at the local protestant church who would hold the most boring sermons in the universe and would be intolerant to gays and evolution, that would have been really funny. Then they could make Homer have the best day of his life due to skipping church, and even God would agree that going to church is kinda pointless. Too bad nothing like that could ever happen in the Simpsons, a show where only other nationalities and rich people can be mocked.
 
Thank god the thought police haven't infilitrated youtube videos and comments :)



(video involves a suffragette campaigner)

James W15 hours ago
Wow.... she wrong about 99% of everything she said.


DylanDaDevil14 hours ago
BAN WOMEN, REVOKE THE 19TH, put them back in the kitchen we need more white babies.

SuperBatDuck 114 hours ago
Ben Shirrako says STFU LIBTARD

Carlos Valverde14 hours ago
Ladies and gentlemen, 2018 GOTY is here

Optimus Troll14 hours ago
Yes this is it, the game of the year, simply by killing feminists! Brilliant

kuaikukia8 hours ago
So many games try to promoting feminist. This game on the other hand let you beat the shit up feminist with many different ways. Definitely my vote Game of the year

13 hours ago
If we did this back then, we wouldn't have the problems we have with them today........

15 hours ago (edited)
Now tie her to the train track. Damn annoying feminist. I can hear her at almost every corner of that town. I just shot her in the throat with an arrow.

U Fuk6 hours ago
The Npc meme is so right in so many way this enhance it even more

Fr. So annoying how they want equality in a time where they weren’t allowed to vote, were looked down upon and weren’t allowed to work, where they were frowned upon if they weren’t a stay at home mother adhering and obeying all their husbands needs.


Megashark 10112 hours ago
Chris E Exactly!


Tired of being jewed3 hours ago
Found the typical delusional and (((indoctrinated))) virtue signaling NPC shithead that can't accept that (((feminism))) is literally retarded and unnatural. Plus you do know that you still ain't going to get any pussy no matter how much you virtue signal to feminist shitheads. DEAL WITH IT you pathetic and delusional shithead as you deserve to have a 50 caliber bullet shot right through your delusional excrement filled head.
Show less



mrwarmind13 hours ago
tie multiple feminists and group them together, then drop a dynamite or throw a molotov at them

Mark my words,this will end up as a kotaku or polygon article.


Richard David. Sanchez III
12 hours ago
Cucktako and pollycuck

 
Last edited:
@berbatrick you missed some of the worst ones




Read it and tend to agree with the above tweet. They also gave BOTW a 6 and watchdogs 2 a 9. So it’s clear their tactic is to get as much attention as possible.

If the lead was a female I’m sure they would have given it a 10.


And my post to him was nothing to do about this game in particular before you got so defensive. I just don’t understand people who moan before the game is even out about characters and shit. Oh noes there’s no playable female character. That’s all resetera and used to be neogaf bullshit. Let the developers use what character they see best. Including a playable female character isn’t going to make the story 100 times better if you haven’t liked the last 5 Rockstar story games. This is a western game and it makes perfectly good logical sense to base the game around a white character. It wouldn’t make sense if there’s a transgender in 1899 going around being a cowboy. Go read my posts in the neogaf thread, I laugh at this sort of pathetic shit and it has nothing to do with Rockstar or any game.
 
It is probably because I'm now a middle aged man but christ on a bike I do despair sometimes at the things that people appear to be offended at now. People are free to get offended at stuff but let's not burn down the house just because somebody doesn't like the curtains.
 
@berbatrick you missed some of the worst ones

Why you tagging me in this thread? You tell me to ignore you yet you tagging me. That doesn’t make sense. I been through my points and several others did to you in that thread where you just responded in a condescending fashion and posted smilies at them. I got a warning for no reason the other day @Damien yet people can start shit up again when I been through it 100 times with this guy.

Maybe you should read your first post in that thread where you say you hate the stories in Rockstars game and they should include a female because it will make it better somehow. If you don’t like Rockstar stories then you ain’t going to like one. Btw have you actually played the game yet? Or are you still sitting there being armchair critic frantically looking for any negative you can find about the game.

Funny how you comparing my post to those people. When if you bothered to read my post I said let the developer behind the game choose the character not idiots like you crying if they don’t get their way. If red dead had a monkey or a pig as the lead character I could care less as long as the game is fun. It’s just a shame people like you don’t understand the word fun.

Maybe you should also post your condescending replies in this thread too.
 
I haven't seen the documentary but a few of the responses here ("being teased on school with his catchphrases") made me support his removal. I think this article makes a really good case why he should not be removed.

Don't get rid of Apu. He's a hero to many of us
Bhaskar Sunkara
As an Indian-American, I learned to embrace Apu. I hope he stays on The Simpsons
...
The United States is incredibly economically divided today, but perhaps no group more so than Indian-Americans. We’re either pumping your gas or we’re performing open-heart surgery. For Indian-American actor Utkarsh Ambudkar having Apu represent us is a disgrace. An “idiot, potbelly dude, who can’t even speak English”. Obama-era surgeon general Vivek Murthy expresses similar shame in Kondabolu’s documentary.

It would seem that the solution is to have every media depiction of an Indian guy in America be Kal Penn playing a doctor. But a lot of us pump gas too. A lot of us say things like “Thank you come again,” because good service counts when you’re living on the razor edge of a society that doesn’t care about struggling people – wherever they’re originally from.

Kondabolu, to his credit, is nuanced throughout the documentary and has expressed dismay at the idea that killing off Apu would be a solution to “the Apu problem”. But his film never can really tell us what he wants to see – it’s just circular complaints about representation.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/01/apu-simpsons-hero
 
Indoctrinated delusional virtue signalling NPC shithead.

That's my new favorite insult.
 
Imagine going on Twitter to complain because someone didn't use the word snowman.

I've seen "snowpeople" used for years, so it's hardly a new thing anyway.
 
Imagine going on Twitter to complain because someone didn't use the word snowman.

I've seen "snowpeople" used for years, so it's hardly a new thing anyway.

I'd say that Twitter is a prime driver of the PC world we now live in. Me personally it's the first time I've heard the word 'snowpeople'. My grandkids still refer to them as snowmen, but they're all under the age of 4. Maybe a few more years of watching Cbeebies will put them right. I certainly agree though that it's totally laughable on both sides. Why would anyone get so upset over the gender distinction of a lump of snow ? & why would anyone give a f**k at those people wanting to change the terminology.
 
I'd say that Twitter is a prime driver of the PC world we now live in. Me personally it's the first time I've heard the word 'snowpeople'. My grandkids still refer to them as snowmen, but they're all under the age of 4. Maybe a few more years of watching Cbeebies will put them right. I certainly agree though that it's totally laughable on both sides. Why would anyone get so upset over the gender distinction of a lump of snow ? & why would anyone give a f**k at those people wanting to change the terminology.
I was curious so I looked on Google Books and Archive.org and there are multiple books from the 70s and 80s (even a few earlier than that) calling them snowpeople.

I would agree that anyone getting offended about them being called "snowmen" would be being a bit silly as well, but this is even dumber than if that happened IMO. One person didn't use it and it's indoctrination worthy of articles and outrage.
 
https://metro.co.uk/2018/11/05/poli...-presenter-calls-snowmen-snow-people-8107302/

It's like the old joke : What's the difference between snowmen & snowwomen ? Answer : Snowballs

In that context it’s fine. Snow people = snow men + snow women. Who hasn’t stuck a couple of extra snowballs on the chest of a snow man? So it makes sense that she talks about “snow people”

People who make acccusations of political correctness that isn’t there are just as annoying as people who get offended over shit that’s not worth getting offended about. Basically, people are annoying. Especially the journalists who realise the best way to get clicks is creating deliberately controversial articles based around a half dozen tweets from idiots.
 
69 year old TV personality Emile Ratelband is taking legal action to officially change his age to 45 saying he identifies as a 45 year old and should be able to do so.

Daily mail ran m item bout it. Not going to bother linking it though. For perspective he's doing this tongue in cheek it seems.
 
Last edited:
I always find it really stupid when people complain about people doing specific things in a game where the whole point is you can do anything. Not to mention it's extra stupid when pretty much everything in the game is a negative thing. Like, "Oh tying people up and throwing them off cliffs or putting them on a railway track to get squished was fine, but this..."
 
I always find it really stupid when people complain about people doing specific things in a game where the whole point is you can do anything. Not to mention it's extra stupid when pretty much everything in the game is a negative thing. Like, "Oh tying people up and throwing them off cliffs or putting them on a railway track to get squished was fine, but this..."

I found youtube vids of it and the comments were a little more specific than "random thing to do in a game".

https://www.redcafe.net/threads/has...tually-gone-mad.404570/page-144#post-23247416
 
I found youtube vids of it and the comments were a little more specific than "random thing to do in a game".

https://www.redcafe.net/threads/has...tually-gone-mad.404570/page-144#post-23247416
Yeah those people are dickheads and the comments are shitty, but the article on the previous page is about Rockstar being criticized for it, it's not their fault that those idiots are saying those kinds of things. If the article was "People on Youtube video of video game say stupid things" then I would agree, but I think it's ridiculous for anybody to be blaming Rockstar for it and asking them to explain themselves.
 
Yeah those people are dickheads and the comments are shitty, but the article on the previous page is about Rockstar being criticized for it, it's not their fault that those idiots are saying those kinds of things. If the article was "People on Youtube video of video game say stupid things" then I would agree, but I think it's ridiculous for anybody to be blaming Rockstar for it and asking them to explain themselves.

Oh, I agree. I do think there's a story with the reactions to that option in the game, but the story isn't "how dare they put in that option."
 
Yeah those people are dickheads and the comments are shitty, but the article on the previous page is about Rockstar being criticized for it, it's not their fault that those idiots are saying those kinds of things. If the article was "People on Youtube video of video game say stupid things" then I would agree, but I think it's ridiculous for anybody to be blaming Rockstar for it and asking them to explain themselves.
My guess is that people who don't really know how games like Red Dead or GTA work think the game actually tasks you with killing a suffragette. That's not on Rockstar, though.

I've said it plenty of times, but if someone identifies as a videogamer (as in, they consider playing videogames their defining trait), there's a good chance they're scum.
 
Just discovered that “AD” and “BC” are falling out of favour. Too Christian, apparently. Discovered this in a fairly right on kid’s book my daughter is reading, all about famous wonen in history. They’re all born either BCE or CE. Not sure I approve.

Look on the inside cover at what year was the book published. It ought to say 4.5 billion if they're gonna be consistent.
 
Just discovered that “AD” and “BC” are falling out of favour. Too Christian, apparently. Discovered this in a fairly right on kid’s book my daughter is reading, all about famous women in history. They’re all born either BCE or CE. Not sure I approve.
I'm probably missing something but they seem to have replace before christ with before the christian era. I can see it's a bit different but not a lot. I suspect it will change again before long.
 
I'm probably missing something but they seem to have replace before christ with before the christian era. I can see it's a bit different but not a lot. I suspect it will change again before long.
Before current era surely?