Harry Maguire | Signed

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't understand where this arrogance is coming from some of your fans.
Even when you won the league and were in the champions league you were humble as anything

We are not being arrogant though, we as a fanbase are primarily happy with the direction we appear to be going and the ambition being shown by our owners.

15/16 was something I never thought I would see in my lifetime and I've been going down and a ST holder for over 4 decades.

We were a yo yo club for many years mainly top 2 flights but third teir for 1 season, seeing the glory once and the rebuild since, with a dirth of mainly young talented players,coupled with some experienced quality is exciting.

If you perceive being optimistic about the direction we are going and looking forward to the season ahead, hopefully watching exciting attacking football, as arrogant then guilty as charged.

The owner has a clear plan and he is supporting BR in having a right good go at the difficult task of gatecrashing the established top 6.

Time will tell, I think it will be an interesting ride and believe me I like the majority of our fans know how quickly things can go wrong in the beautiful game.

Increased competition from the 'smaller' clubs is surely better for the EPL?
The Sky/ BT money and more oligarch and rich owners coming into the league is meaning the top heavy control is not quite so prevalent.

In the 80s n 90s Man City n Chelsea were yo yo and not so 'big' and succesful as they have been over the last few years, why shouldn't any club including us strive for improvement and European places?

As for Jones et al, it was a point being made and it's more like I would have much more faith in our recruitment process and formula than yours as present.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: golden_blunder
I'm sure Ed is thinking he's been asked to spend over 100 million on Roja, Lindelof and Bailly then he's been asked to give new contracts to Jones ,Smalling and Tuanzebe. All players who are still at the club .

No wonder he is thinking why on earth would I spend another 80 million now on another centre back when no other club has spent this amount ?
Yeah I can’t think of another club who have bought loads of centre backs for a fortune?
 
No maguire, and we get to see Smalling and Jones play Cb. No way is Axel getting more games than them two in the pl.
 
Yes and no. Leicester is absolutely right to say to City or United that we want £100 million or £80 million - I perfectly agree with you. Just like United can do with Pogba. Or they can even say - no, we are not gonna sell at any price.

But here is the problem - regardless of whether or not Leicester agrees with it or accepts it - they are a stepping stone. And don't think that I am trying to disrespect Leicester, I have the utmost respect for what Leicester have built. And in the position they now are - about 95 % of all other clubs in England are stepping-stones towards Leicester, but for City, United, Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal and Spurs - Leicester are a stepping stone.

And if Leicester starts making it too difficult for players to get their Dream-moves - it could create problems for Leicester when they try to sign players later. So you are right - Leicester could in theory ask for £90 million for Maguire - and that is their right, but its probably £15-20 million higher than what is realistic...and Harry Maguire knows it. And if Leicester destroys his Dream move over an unrealistic fee, that could possible have an effect on the next Harry Maguire deciding between Palace, Leicester or West Ham.

So your Economics 101 is perhaps a bit more complex than what you make it out to be.

I totally agree with you! :)

This is why this is difficult for Leicester. Part of the strategy seems to be offering players with potential a route to the 1st team (Maddison, Ricardo, Tielemans, Ayoze, as well as our own u21s such as Chilwell, now Barnes, etc).
If we just flatly refuse to strike deals, it derails this approach, because as you say, such players will just go to alternate clubs. Balancing this with getting the right price, having the right players to replace them (Like we seem to be doing with James Justin coming in as understudy to Ricardo, who if hes has another great season will likely have offers next season)

Again, a great post - thoroughly agree with you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: golden_blunder
Also think this is going to be tight. I have heard there is a deadline for any bids to be entertained. If no significant movement in the 5 days or so, it is unlikely there will be movement at all. (No bowel jokes please). I am sure for sensible fans this is understood from the Utd side, as there would be a load of work for Leicester to do should an acceptable bid come in, and you may not care, but Leicester certainly will.

Harry has already been in all friendly squads since he got back, so getting a replacement over the line, embedded in the squad, will certainly take some time.

He is currently in the squad for today’s friendly versus Stoke, so unless that changes for some reason, it is certainly looking less and less likely.

Final word, I also heard the acceptance criteria is 90m not 80m. Don’t shoot the messenger.
 
No chance we are going diop, the rumour was we were asked and quoted 60-70m. Dunk would be 40m and the melt down would be hilarious
Nah £40m was the early bird Leicester price. For us at this stage in the window you're looking upwards of £60m as they know we're backed into a corner.
 
Also think this is going to be tight. I have heard there is a deadline for any bids to be entertained.

i'm fully expecting the next big update from the BBC or someone like Simon Peach is going to be "MUFC have finished their window after not finding value in the market and will now focus on trimming the squad"

We can all feel it deep down, this kind of story is just around the corner.
 
i'm fully expecting the next big update from the BBC or someone like Simon Peach is going to be "MUFC have finished their window after not finding value in the market and will now focus on trimming the squad"

We can all feel it deep down, this kind of story is just around the corner.
A deadline day swoop for (surplus-to-requirements) Saints Ace Lemina will satisfy the fans.
 
Not going to open a new thread on this unless Fridge Chutney wants to. Slightly related to the Maguire saga.

Really surprised that nobody, so far, has come in for Adam Webster of Bristol City. Guesstimate price around £25m, could be cheaper. Seen a fair bit of this guy due to family connections who are now Bristol City supporters. Age 24, 6ft 3, commanding CB and good on the ball. Doubt we’d go for him but he would be ideal at a lower level PL club and may well step on up from that eventually. One to keep an eye on imo.

Wow I can't believe someone else gets it. There are so many other defenders at Maguire's level and higher. I'd put Webster right up there. If he went to an Everton or Leicester he'd be quality pl defender in 1 season. Then we'd buy for 60/70m. Where are our alternatives? We're just linked with the same three players constantly. Are we even using scouts? Even Ayoze Perez would have been a good squad addition for United. 30m and young, wants to improve. What are United actually doing?
 
I'd be shocked if there's a plan b, if we don't sign him, we won't sign another CB.

Dont reckon we'd do that 2 years in a row. I'm sure we'll sign a CB if not Maguire then someone else. Would be incredible if we didn't.
 
A deadline day swoop for (surplus-to-requirements) Saints Ace Lemina will satisfy the fans.

I think even woodward was scarred by the Fellaini saga. Never seen it that bad since. However, the excuses will come soon. It will either be as i've highlighted above, or some utter nonsense put out by woodward that "ole is SO IMPRESSED by the youth this window that he doesn't feel the need to spend any more. Ole feels the balance of youth and experience is working well"
 
As I've said, its hypothetical. Don't dodge the question, you've clearly stated that you don't understand why fans care how much the club shell out for the player.

So if clubs shall out 200m, if the fans care about it, do you still hold your stances? Again, let me emphasis again, this is purely hypothetical scenario. Don't dodge it, just a simple yes or no.

Okay.

Spending £200 million on Maguire, when the likes of De Ligt, Kouibaly, Marquinhos and Varane would be available for signifcantly less, would be idiotic to say the least. Not that the Glazers would even consider sanctioning the deal. So no, I wouldn't be happy :)
 
Okay.

Spending £200 million on Maguire, when the likes of De Ligt, Kouibaly, Marquinhos and Varane would be available for signifcantly less, would be idiotic to say the least. Not that the Glazers would even consider sanctioning the deal. So no, I wouldn't be happy :)

Exactly. That's how the fans feel at this stage, when we have to pay reportedly 85-90m in order to get Maguire, while the likes of De Ligt, who is younger and better, only went for 67m. There are fans who are not happy about us overpaying the players who are rated lower and older, and its understandable. Its all about how much we can tolerate, some can tolerate us overpaid by extra 10m, some can tolerate 20m, some can tolerate 30-40m etc. But eventually, everyone has to draw their line somewhere. Maybe for you, 80-90m (overpay by 20-30m) is ok, but at 200m (overpay by 130-140m) is total nonsense, and you wouldn't be happy.
 
Last edited:
Exactly. That's how the fans feel at this stage, when we have to pay reportedly 85-90m in order to get Maguire, while the likes of De Ligt, who is younger and better, only went for 67m. There are fans who are not happy about us overpaying the players who are rated lower and older, and its understandable. Its all about how much we can tolerate, some can tolerate we overpaid by extra 10m, some can tolerate 20m, some can tolerate 30-40m etc.
There is no way to please all the fans. If we buy a young talented CB for a fair price, half of the supporters will say it's another Bailly situation. If we purchase Maguire for the quoted insane fess, the other half will say we are grossly overpaying.

The struggles in the last 6 years really have driven the whole fanbase insane.
 
As with one of the above posters, I genuinely would prefer Plan B to be Tuanzebe-Lindelof.

I wouldn’t understand a Plan B of Milenkovic / Diop when we have Tuanzebe already here who, I’d argue, has a higher potential ceiling than them.
 
Exactly. That's how the fans feel at this stage, when we have to pay reportedly 85-90m in order to get Maguire, while the likes of De Ligt, who is younger and better, only went for 67m. There are fans who are not happy about us overpaying the players who are rated lower and older, and its understandable. Its all about how much we can tolerate, some can tolerate us overpaid by extra 10m, some can tolerate 20m, some can tolerate 30-40m etc. But eventually, everyone has to draw their line somewhere. Maybe for you, 80-90m (overpay by 20-30m) is ok, but at 200m (overpay by 130-140m) is total nonsense, and you wouldn't be happy.

On this, we agree.

But we're not going to pay £200 million for Harry Maguire or anywhere close to that figure, so chill.
 
We cannot persist with our current CB options. Woodward needs to pay up or our scouts need to identify another option. What was even the point of doing anything this window of we're not going to get the wholesale changes we need.
 
We cannot persist with our current CB options. Woodward needs to pay up or our scouts need to identify another option.

Well, if our budget is limited, another option for Woodward would be to spend money on other positions, if CB is not attainable. It's good to get a CB, but RF and midfield also needs reinforcements. It's better then to spend Maguire money in midfield than don't buy anyone.
 
As with one of the above posters, I genuinely would prefer Plan B to be Tuanzebe-Lindelof.

I wouldn’t understand a Plan B of Milenkovic / Diop when we have Tuanzebe already here who, I’d argue, has a higher potential ceiling than them.
Why would you argue that though? On what basis?
 
God knows if I'm not convinced it's going to happen. We've become even tighter with money, he's not gonna rock the boat for a move and the Leicester don't need the money. Not sure if they'd have time to replace him either...
 
As with one of the above posters, I genuinely would prefer Plan B to be Tuanzebe-Lindelof.

I wouldn’t understand a Plan B of Milenkovic / Diop when we have Tuanzebe already here who, I’d argue, has a higher potential ceiling than them.


Id be scared every time we conceded a corner with a lindo tuanzebe combo
 
He's suggesting Leicester would sell because of the figures being thrown around. Rodgers confirmed they already rejected a huge offer. We either pay the evaluation or he isn't coming.
Ole’s comments about us not changing targets just because you hit an obstacle implies we will go all in for Maguire before deadline day. This one will get done for a record fee. City have shown time and again that they will walk away and not compete with us on fees, so we will stump up the ludicrous fee Leicester are demanding for a player who will need to be replaced if we ever want to challenge for the league, he simply isn’t top tier. Anything to shut up our moaning fans will be worth it at this point,
 
Exactly. That's how the fans feel at this stage, when we have to pay reportedly 85-90m in order to get Maguire, while the likes of De Ligt, who is younger and better, only went for 67m. There are fans who are not happy about us overpaying the players who are rated lower and older, and its understandable. Its all about how much we can tolerate, some can tolerate us overpaid by extra 10m, some can tolerate 20m, some can tolerate 30-40m etc. But eventually, everyone has to draw their line somewhere. Maybe for you, 80-90m (overpay by 20-30m) is ok, but at 200m (overpay by 130-140m) is total nonsense, and you wouldn't be happy.
Have said it already in this thread. Using DeLigt as a price comparison is a folly. He went for that price because Ajax had an agreement with him not to price him out of the market so he could choose where he wanted to go. Otherwise he would have gone for €100m in a bidding war.
Unusual transfer and an outlier, not really relevant to discussing Maguires alleged price tag
 
Have said it already in this thread. Using DeLigt as a price comparison is a folly. He went for that price because Ajax had an agreement with him not to price him out of the market so he could choose where he wanted to go. Otherwise he would have gone for €100m in a bidding war.
Unusual transfer and an outlier, not really relevant to discussing Maguires alleged price tag

If that is true then it is absolutely absurd from a business perspective. Ajax risking 40m to honour a gentleman's agreement. I suppose they didn't know his value was going to skyrocket back then.
 
Ole’s comments about us not changing targets just because you hit an obstacle implies we will go all in for Maguire before deadline day. This one will get done for a record fee. City have shown time and again that they will walk away and not compete with us on fees, so we will stump up the ludicrous fee Leicester are demanding for a player who will need to be replaced if we ever want to challenge for the league, he simply isn’t top tier. Anything to shut up our moaning fans will be worth it at this point,

i agreed with most of this, but i just think the idea that fans have any influence over the emotions of staff or policy of the club is just false. We are like white noise to these people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.