Ronaldo's Mum Eh?
Ronaldo is shite
Left wing redcafe is very nationalist when it comes to football
This forum is almost extreme far left, it's crazy.
Left wing redcafe is very nationalist when it comes to football
Why you think it’s called Redcafe Nothing to do with United..This forum is almost extreme far left, it's crazy.
Strip the captain's armband off him, give it to Bruno and send this cnut on the bench and line up a CB in the summer
Useless wanker
Not really, but Maguire is extremely slow, so someone with average pace will look quick next time someone who is very slow.Is Calvert Lewin even quick? It was strange watching him just pull away from Maguire so easily for the first
DCL completely ignored him as if he wasn't there. The only reason he isn't rinsed was because DDG was even worse, yet if this exact sequence happened to Liverpool, we'd be laughing our arses off at VVD.He had a few yards on CDL and I thought he would just mop it up - next thing I see them on the attack...and no contrary to the original poster’s belief, Maguire did not force CDL out wide, he ran into the space that was available. Everyone can see that Maguire and Lindelof are too slow to defend a high line against pacy attacks yet Ole does it time and time again. As Einstein said only a fool does the same thing twice expecting a different result...
I found it funny you said he wasn’t at fault for any of the goals. You’re not allowed to use ‘lol’ on here so I used a smilie.A laughing smiley, how mature.
By your logic everyone is partly at fault, for losing the ball, allowing the pass, not shouting enough (because you seem to view shouting as more important than the actual defending), missing headers and tackles, etc.
No defender will stop every shot, sometimes you have to make it as difficult as possible - that's why DCL scuffed it, and left a nice simple save that DDG messed up. The second and third were down to poor marking by the players actually marking the goalscorers, Fred and Tuanzebe.
To be fair he might have done.
But then this would imply Lindelöf and Maguire actually communicate with each other during a game of football.
He had a few yards on CDL and I thought he would just mop it up - next thing I see them on the attack...and no contrary to the original poster’s belief, Maguire did not force CDL out wide, he ran into the space that was available. Everyone can see that Maguire and Lindelof are too slow to defend a high line against pacy attacks yet Ole does it time and time again. As Einstein said only a fool does the same thing twice expecting a different result...
What makes him clearly better than that bunch? His price?That's a heavy exaggeration, he's clearly better than any of the defenders you mentioned. He's not in the VVD or Diaz (on current form) tier, but he's in the one below. There is a decent drop between the tiers admittedly.
I'd say the last goal is mostly on Tuanzebe, he was marking DCL and left him, after giving away the free kick stupidly as well.
I found it funny you said he wasn’t at fault for any of the goals. You’re not allowed to use ‘lol’ on here so I used a smilie.
Hes the captain, the leader of the defence, the whole point of him is to take responsibility for our defending. He doesn’t, we concede the same type of goals over and over again. So obviously our defenders are going to be looked at. In particular the central pair. Of course you can trace any goal back to a misplaced ticket or pass further up the field but that is daft logic to use when assessing your centre backs on goals conceded. You look at their behaviour and their defending , and for all three goals Maguire wasn’t good enough which is common. We have the worse defensive record in the top half of the table and a lot of it is to do with Harry Maguire.
Can’t we then say Lindelof would be good with quick defender to partner him as well?Do people still think he's not good enough or would a quick CB to partner him be enough?
I think he's been good the last number of weeks but again he just doesn't strike me as a leader.
He's not good enough if we aim to be a top side.Do people still think he's not good enough or would a quick CB to partner him be enough?
I think he's been good the last number of weeks but again he just doesn't strike me as a leader.
Worse defence in the top half, Maguire plays every game. Leicester fans are till this day delighted they got 80 million for him. Pretty much most fans outside of United don’t rate Maguire. At this point saying my criticism is an agenda is nonsense.It's still a childish emoji, makes your post adversarial rather than respectfully disagreeing.
You talk about blaming misplaced passes being daft logic, and yet try to justify blaming Maguire for everyone else's mistakes because "he should be shouting" which will somehow magically make Tuanzebe not rubbish at the end.
Quite simply, you're looking for reasons for this to be his fault to push an agenda, rather than blaming the players who were culpable for the goals.
Worse defence in the top half, Maguire plays every game. Leicester fans are till this day delighted they got 80 million for him. Pretty much most fans outside of United don’t rate Maguire. At this point saying my criticism is an agenda is nonsense.
I didn’t even blame him for everyone else’s mistakes, my point was he contributed to the goals by defending poorly for all of them. Tuanzebe, Lindelof and DeGea are also to blame. But in case you haven’t noticed, this is the Maguire thread. If you look in the degea thread you will notice me moaning about him too and also Lindelof in the Maguire/Lindelof partnership thread.
I didn’t even mention the fact he played Everton onside for that last goal and stuck his hand up to say it was up. He’s just generally a pretty rubbish defender far too many times for my liking. He literally offers no command in that defence. Too passive when defending set pieces, doesn’t attack ground balls, shits himself anytime he gets in one on one race.
This is the 4th time this season I’ve rated him a 2 or below in the match day thread. I didn’t even do this for Jesse Lingard. Today, RBL, Tottenham, Palace, it’s just not even close to being good enough for a player in his position. If pointing that out means I have an agenda so be it.
Do people still think he's not good enough or would a quick CB to partner him be enough?
I think he's been good the last number of weeks but again he just doesn't strike me as a leader.
Giving up 3 shots on target is irrelevant when the £80,000,000 man was responsible for goals against us.He didn't defend poorly today, as a team we only gave up 3 shots on target.
At the end it was Keane who got the knockdown, who was played onside by 6 players.
Rating him a 2 or below simply isn't close to accurate, nonsense as you put it. I'll accept it as hyperbole rather than agenda driven if you rated the rest of our defence as badly and DDG worse (except for Shaw as he picked up an assist).
As for your other examples, who was good enough against Spurs or Palace (who were clearly fitter)? RBL the same.
He didn't defend poorly today, as a team we only gave up 3 shots on target.
At the end it was Keane who got the knockdown, who was played onside by 6 players.
Rating him a 2 or below simply isn't close to accurate, nonsense as you put it. I'll accept it as hyperbole rather than agenda driven if you rated the rest of our defence as badly and DDG worse (except for Shaw as he picked up an assist).
As for your other examples, who was good enough against Spurs or Palace (who were clearly fitter)? RBL the same.
Absolutely spot on this bit. Could not have summed up his defensive style any better .He's way too limited to be in a top side that looks to dominate games. He shined in lower level teams that generally sat back and hit on the break, where he could just sit near his own box and head out cross after cross (something he does very well). But when he's required to defend near the half way line, both athletically and positionally he's just out of his depth. People always come back to his pace but he's shown continually that he really isn't great at holding positions either (just look at Everton's 3rd goal). On top of that he's a mediocre player on ball that fancies himself as something much more, and you get a player that's way more of a liability in certain situations than someone with perhaps more "highlight" worthy mistakes like Bailly or Smalling ever was.
Maguire gets away with not being the spot of criticism because he plays not to screw up, instead of challenging and risk getting embarrassed. He got rinsed on the sprint against DCL, but he backed off so much to allow the shot that it was DDG that really got the blame. The second goal was just cowardice by him and Lindelof, both of whom made piss poor efforts to actually block the shot. Maguire pulled out so much you'd think he had a photoshoot afterwards, and it was fecking embarrassing watching our captain do that after seeing Bailly make the same block with no regards to our health just a few weeks ago.
That's not the point though. If Maguire had been in line with the rest of the team, the second ball wouldn't matter.This is a screenshot of the first part of the play, if you actually post a shot of the second part with the flick on, MCT is actually the last man. Also the guy (think its AWB) should have been winning that header that was flicked on.
Who knew having two white as bread CB's would be slow as shit? Wesley Snipes was right, but it ain't jumpin' that's the problem.
Eh?Who knew having two white as bread CB's would be slow as shit? Wesley Snipes was right, but it ain't jumpin' that's the problem.
'Black people run fast, I saw it in the olympics. We need a black person to play cb, cause they run fast'.
So if we’d had white as bread Dias and Laporte as our CBs we’d have been in equal trouble?
Laughable post if not for the stupidly unnecessary connotations.