Harry Maguire image 5

Harry Maguire England flag

2020-21 Performances


View full 2020-21 profile

5.9 Season Average Rating
Appearances
52
Clean sheets
21
Goals
3
Assists
1
Yellow cards
15
Status
Not open for further replies.
I can read shite from the likes of you on here. Don’t need to go to Goldbridge for it. On this occasion he happens to be right it would seem. If you think our defence was fantastic then you’re a fecking lunatic. Arsenal can’t attack for shit and have a grand total of 9 goals in the league this season.

So in a game where Arsenal was on the front foot and we held them to only 7 shots you think our defense played poorly??? And then you try to claim you don't know who Goldbridge is? Yeah right. Keep trying to pretend. you are pretty much quoting him word for word and then pretending they are your own thoughts. Just another Goldbridge muppet...
 
So in a game where Arsenal was on the front foot and we held them to only 7 shots you think our defense played poorly??? And then you try to claim you don't know who Goldbridge is? Yeah right. Keep trying to pretend. you are pretty much quoting him word for word and then pretending they are your own thoughts. Just another Goldbridge muppet...
Did I say they played poorly? No. Did I say I’ve never heard of Mark Goldbridge? No. Learn to read.
 
You watched him for United presumably? Well his passing percentage throughout his career is better than Maguire’s. Passing stats don’t make a good passer.

How many posters have you accused of having an agenda against Maguire now?

Only the ones who obviously do. You are one of them obviously. And it's not just Maguire. It's scapegoating our best players. Let me guess, next you're going to go hard on McTominay and defend Pogba?
 
"My stats have VVD ahead?" In what world are you living in? VVD was better in a few areas, but Maguire was better in many more. Only a fool would deny that. But I get it...you have an agenda against Maguire and silly things like facts don't fit in...
If I was "selectively pulling my own data" don't you think I would only post stats that showed Maguire ahead? I posted all the defensive stats and supplied a source. Just because the data doesn't suit your agenda, it doesn't mean it's wrong. And I did not ignore that Maguire lost more duels. In fact, I posted it. If you want to talk about someone ignoring stats, look in the mirror. You are hanging your hat on that one stat while ignoring all the others that I posted. But go on....tell me how you don't have an agenda against Maguire...pfft
I really don't understand the agenda against Maguire. Mark Goldbridge being the worst of the bunch as others just seem to repeat what he says like the muppets they are. They need to quit with the agendas. Has he made mistakes? Yeah, and a couple were actually quite embarrassing. But for the most part, he's been fantastic. Our goals against is down by 20 goals from the previous season. If that isn't enough evidence, then I don't know what is...
Only if you are watching with an agenda against Maguire. he was at fault for the first goal while Bailly was at fault for the next 3...
Just because Goldbridge and everyone else with an agenda against Maguire told you he was the worst doesn't mean he was. And if you don't know why Bailly was at fault for 3 goals, then perhaps this game isn't for you...
Forget about the 80m. That price tag is not his fault. Just compare him to his peers and if you look without bias and without agendas, you will quickly realize that Harry Maguire is our best defender. And it's not even close. Don't believe me? Well let's look at the numbers and compare Maguire to Lindeloff but also compare him to VVD. And seeing as so far this year nobody remembers how to defend (indluding VVD), we will look at the 2019/20 season:

------------------Tckl----Blk---Int--Clr---HdClr----Rec---DW---DL---50/50---ABW---ABL
Maguire-------37------6-----72---157---94-------237--240--128---8---------176-----71
Virgil VD-----23------5------40--162----83------220----239--81----3---------191------60
Lindeloff----29------1------26---122---58------215----135--78----4----------96-------50

Legend: Tckl=Tackles, Blk=Blocks, Int=Interceptions, Clr=Clearances, HdClr=Headed Clearances, Rec=Recoveries, DW=Duals Won, DL=Duals Lost, ABW=Arial Battles Won, ABL=Arial Battles Lost

https://www.premierleague.com/players/9566/Harry-Maguire/stats?co=1&se=274
https://www.premierleague.com/players/5140/Virgil-van-Dijk/stats?co=1&se=274
https://www.premierleague.com/players/5066/Victor-Lindelöf/stats?co=1&se=274

So what do these stats tell us? They tell us a lot. First off, they tell us that Lindeloff is nowhere near Maguire in any defensive category. Oh, and to be clear, I used every defensive stat available and didn't pick and chose stats to help curve the argument to Harry's favour. What else does it tell us? That over all VVD is a better defender, the stats aren't far off from each other with Maguire leading in some areas while VVD leads in others.

So in conclusion, should we sell Harry Maguire? That's a big ole hell no. You don't improve your team by selling your best players, and he is in fact our best defender whether you like to admit it or not. Should he be captain? No he shouldn't. And the recent Greece trip would have been a perfect excuse to take that away from him without controversy. But don't kid yourself into thinking Lindeloff (or even more laughable) and Bailly are better players. It's not even close...

1-4 - Son
Goes charging over to the left, leaving a massive hole in the middle i.e where the danger is. The team shape is destroyed at that point and everybody is scrambling to plug spaces. Then once out there, he doesn't challenge Aurier or even attempt to close down the cross, allowing a free pass for Son to run into the previously mentioned gaping hole.



Then as a bonus, 1-5 - Aurier
Nothing to do with him in the buildup, but once Aurier picks the ball up Maguire slows down and watches him shoot. Any centre back, defender, player of any sort, professional or amateur, should be sprinting and throwing themselves at that. Maguire actually checks his run and let's Aurier pick his placement.



Bailly was at fault only for the 3rd goal, where he was left with few options and under instruction to pass from the back. That's a team failure as much as an individual one.


On that second goal Bailly watches Son walk past him inside. Doesn't attempt to get close to him until after the ball is passed to him. Sure, Maguire should have stepped on the ball, but this is about defending. Blaming the guy who didn't commit a yellow card offense for the goal instead of blaming the guy who was supposed to be marking the goal scorer is nothing more than "agenda 101" against Maguire

On that 4th goal, Maguire is nearest to the crosser, so it is HIS job to go shut him down. Son starts his run from the left side of the field. Again, Bailly watches him make his run and then reacts too late. He lets Son get in front of him. Again, if you are blaming Maguire for going to close down the crosser when he's the closest defender and really want him to stay where he is and give him a free run, then I don't know what to say. This again was on Bailly. Son was his man. Son was the goal scorer. Amazing how you want to blame Maguire for his man making an assist, but give Bailly a free pass for not marking the goal scorer who was his man. And then you claim not to have an agenda? Give your head a shake...
[/QUOTE]
Maguire is not being dropped. You may have some agenda against him, but that doesn't change the fact that he is our best defender. In fact, it's not even close. It's about who partners Maguire, not about leaving him out. I don't think he should be captain, but you don't improve the team by taking out the best players...
Unfortunately facts don't back up your opinion. Bailly and Lindeloff can battle it out with each other to see who is better, but don't let this early season fool you, Maguire is among the elite defenders in the game today (seems like nobody can defend so far this year. Not even VVD). Don't believe me? Let the stats do the talking for him when I compare Maguire, Lindeloff and VVD. You will quickly realize that no matter how big your agenda is against Maguire, or how many times Mark Goldbridge has told you he isn't any good, he is much closer to VVD than he is to Lindeloff

------------------Tckl----Blk---Int--Clr---HdClr----Rec---DW---DL---50/50---ABW---ABL
Maguire-------37------6-----72---157---94-------237--240--128---8---------176-----71
Virgil VD-----23------5------40--162----83------220----239--81----3---------191------60
Lindeloff----29------1------26---122---58------215----135--78----4----------96-------50

Legend: Tckl=Tackles, Blk=Blocks, Int=Interceptions, Clr=Clearances, HdClr=Headed Clearances, Rec=Recoveries, DW=Duals Won, DL=Duals Lost, ABW=Arial Battles Won, ABL=Arial Battles Lost

https://www.premierleague.com/players/9566/Harry-Maguire/stats?co=1&se=274
https://www.premierleague.com/players/5140/Virgil-van-Dijk/stats?co=1&se=274
https://www.premierleague.com/players/5066/Victor-Lindelöf/stats?co=1&se=274
I'm definitely smarter than your average bear :lol: :lol: :lol:

I'm also just sick of this agenda against Maguire. I'm so glad that our supporters don't actually run the team. You don't improve a team by getting rid of your best players. You can state your opinion all you want, but your opinion is 100% wrong. Maguire is in fact our best defender. Too many people let his price tag effect their emotions. Never mind how much he cost. Compare him to his peers. And don't look at this year. This year everyone is horrible. At this rate you and I can start the next game in place of all 3 of them. But if you compare the 3 from last year and you still honestly think that Lindeloff and Bailly are better than him, then perhaps football just isn't for you...
When an opinion is based on agendas, it is not an opinion and it is 100% wrong...
And there it is....the 80m quote. So what are these games you are talking about? If you're talking about this year, then forget it. Nobody is looking good. Like I said, you and I could hold down the back better than they could so far this year. Nobody is on form. So we have to look at last year. If you seriously think that last year Maguire wasn't head and shoulders above everyone else, and then still want to claim you don't have an agenda against him, then I just may be convinced that you may be Mark Goldbridge in disguise...
You don't improve a team by taking the best players out. Whatever your agenda is against Maguire, he is in fact our best defender and it's not even close...
The thing that bothers me is how many muppets there are that just repeat things that influencers with agendas like Mark Goldbridge says. Think for yourself people. The worst of it is the abuse on Maguire. Like it or not he is our best defender. He also didn't set his price tag so stop treating him like he did, and he didn't assign himself the captain, the manager did. Blame him for things he's in control of. Has he been good so far this season? No he hasn't. Has any of our defenders been good this season? Not even close. But that doesn't change the fact that Maguire is our best defender, and it really isn't even close. People asking for Bailly and Lindeloff to start have no idea what they are talking about. And now I see a post asking for McTominay to take his place? WTF? Compare Maguire to his peers, not to his price tag. If you do, you will quickly realize that he is more comparable to VVD than he is to Lindeloff...

------------------Tckl----Blk---Int--Clr---HdClr----Rec---DW---DL---50/50---ABW---ABL
Maguire-------37------6-----72---157---94-------237--240--128---8---------176-----71
Virgil VD-----23------5------40--162----83------220----239--81----3---------191------60
Lindeloff----29------1------26---122---58------215----135--78----4----------96-------50

Legend: Tckl=Tackles, Blk=Blocks, Int=Interceptions, Clr=Clearances, HdClr=Headed Clearances, Rec=Recoveries, DW=Duals Won, DL=Duals Lost, ABW=Arial Battles Won, ABL=Arial Battles Lost

https://www.premierleague.com/players/9566/Harry-Maguire/stats?co=1&se=274
https://www.premierleague.com/players/5140/Virgil-van-Dijk/stats?co=1&se=274
https://www.premierleague.com/players/5066/Victor-Lindelöf/stats?co=1&se=274
------------------Tckl----Blk---Int--Clr---HdClr----Rec---DW---DL---50/50---ABW---ABL
Maguire-------37------6-----72---157---94-------237--240--128---8---------176-----71
Virgil VD-----23------5------40--162----83------220----239--81----3---------191------60
Lindeloff----29------1------26---122---58------215----135--78----4----------96-------50

Legend: Tckl=Tackles, Blk=Blocks, Int=Interceptions, Clr=Clearances, HdClr=Headed Clearances, Rec=Recoveries, DW=Duals Won, DL=Duals Lost, ABW=Arial Battles Won, ABL=Arial Battles Lost

https://www.premierleague.com/players/9566/Harry-Maguire/stats?co=1&se=274
https://www.premierleague.com/players/5140/Virgil-van-Dijk/stats?co=1&se=274
https://www.premierleague.com/players/5066/Victor-Lindelöf/stats?co=1&se=274

I agree that players should be dropped if they aren't playing well. But not because it suits an agenda, but because there are better options to come in. And that's the problem. Even though Maguire has started the year poorly, he is still better than the other options. You start your best 11 and an out of form Maguire still needs to start ahead of a Bailly/Lindeloff partnership.

Put it this way....Liverpool have started horribly and VVD has been at the heart of their issues. Imagine Liverpool fans asking for VVD to be dropped? This agenda against Maguire, spearheaded by Mark Goldbridge, really needs to stop...
This agenda against Maguire really needs to stop. our own supporters are going to be guilty of chasing our best defender out of our team. And yes, he is our best defender. This isn't an opinion, it's a fact. And it isn't even close. He is more like VVD than Lindeloff. The stats don't lie. Did he start poorly this year? Yes he did. Did the rest of our defense start poorly as well? Yes they did. But Maguire some how takes all the blame. You don't improve a team by getting rid of your best players. And Maguire is in fact our best defender. VVD started poorly this year too. Can you imagine Liverpool fans asking for him to be dropped? You guys all need to give your head a massive shake...

------------------Tckl----Blk---Int--Clr---HdClr----Rec---DW---DL---50/50---ABW---ABL
Maguire-------37------6-----72---157---94-------237--240--128---8---------176-----71
Virgil VD-----23------5------40--162----83------220----239--81----3---------191------60
Lindeloff----29------1------26---122---58------215----135--78----4----------96-------50

Legend: Tckl=Tackles, Blk=Blocks, Int=Interceptions, Clr=Clearances, HdClr=Headed Clearances, Rec=Recoveries, DW=Duals Won, DL=Duals Lost, ABW=Arial Battles Won, ABL=Arial Battles Lost

https://www.premierleague.com/players/9566/Harry-Maguire/stats?co=1&se=274
https://www.premierleague.com/players/5140/Virgil-van-Dijk/stats?co=1&se=274
https://www.premierleague.com/players/5066/Victor-Lindelöf/stats?co=1&se=274
I love how people quote Mark Goldbridge word for word and pretend they are coming up with their own thoughts. Enough with the agenda against Maguire. He was one of the best players on the pitch today...
Stats vs Chelsea

-----------------------Tackles--Inter--Clearances---Aerial won---Blocks--Pass%---Rating
Maguire------------0------------1------------6----------------5------------------1---------88.3------7.32
Lindelof-------------1-----------1------------2----------------1------------------1---------90.3------6.98

https://www.whoscored.com/Players/99487/MatchStatistics/Harry-Maguire
https://www.whoscored.com/Players/100008/MatchStatistics/Victor-Lindelöf

I am really getting tired of this agenda against Maguire. Maguire is our best defender. This isn't my opinion. It's a fact...
No idea. I don't watch Serie A. I watch United and Maguire's passing was fine. Nobody in the back line is to blame for the result today. They were the best players on the pitch. The finger pointing needs to be aimed at players further up the pitch. Blame the players who need to be blamed, not the players who you have an agenda against. We lost 1-0 from a penalty a midfielder stupidly gave away and only only 7(2) shots against all game. The midfield and attack should be thanking the defense for keeping us in the game and should be praised not scapegoated...
Just a selection of the posts where you’ve accused somebody of having an agenda against Maguire. And numerous references to Mark Goldbridge. There’s definitely an agenda here but it’s not the one you think it is.
 
He had a pass % rating of 92% today but he can't pass???? Holy f*ck you guys really need to stop your agendas :lol: :lol: :lol:

Yes, because pass accuracy is EXACTLY what I was talking about.
Learn context.

His passes were poor in the context of the game. Slow, pedestrian, telegraphed and about as dynamic and progressive as reading the Yellow Pages.
 
Not remotely the take away from today but always nice to see a centre half decide that what the moment really requires when losing in the last couple of minutes of a game is a speculative punt of a shot from 30 yards. He'll take his place in the Marcos Rojo hall of fame.

Proper Captain's performance. Vintage Kompany.
 
On that second goal Bailly watches Son walk past him inside. Doesn't attempt to get close to him until after the ball is passed to him. Sure, Maguire should have stepped on the ball, but this is about defending. Blaming the guy who didn't commit a yellow card offense for the goal instead of blaming the guy who was supposed to be marking the goal scorer is nothing more than "agenda 101" against Maguire

On that 4th goal, Maguire is nearest to the crosser, so it is HIS job to go shut him down. Son starts his run from the left side of the field. Again, Bailly watches him make his run and then reacts too late. He lets Son get in front of him. Again, if you are blaming Maguire for going to close down the crosser when he's the closest defender and really want him to stay where he is and give him a free run, then I don't know what to say. This again was on Bailly. Son was his man. Son was the goal scorer. Amazing how you want to blame Maguire for his man making an assist, but give Bailly a free pass for not marking the goal scorer who was his man. And then you claim not to have an agenda? Give your head a shake...












Just a selection of the posts where you’ve accused somebody of having an agenda against Maguire. And numerous references to Mark Goldbridge. There’s definitely an agenda here but it’s not the one you think it is.
[/QUOTE]

Because they do have agendas against Maguire. i have more than proved that he isn't the problem yet he keeps getting scapegoated by muppets like you who can't think for yourself and just quote Mark Goldbridge
 
Just a selection of the posts where you’ve accused somebody of having an agenda against Maguire. And numerous references to Mark Goldbridge. There’s definitely an agenda here but it’s not the one you think it is.

Because they do have agendas against Maguire. i have more than proved that he isn't the problem yet he keeps getting scapegoated by muppets like you who can't think for yourself and just quote Mark Goldbridge
[/QUOTE]
Weirdo.
 
Yes, because pass accuracy is EXACTLY what I was talking about.
Learn context.

His passes were poor in the context of the game. Slow, pedestrian, telegraphed and about as dynamic and progressive as reading the Yellow Pages.

So because he isn't:lol: Pirlo his passing was bad? :lol: :lol: :lol: Yet another agenda. Blame the players who need to be blamed not the players who were the best on the field
 
Just a selection of the posts where you’ve accused somebody of having an agenda against Maguire. And numerous references to Mark Goldbridge. There’s definitely an agenda here but it’s not the one you think it is.

:lol:

Good work. Who watches Goldbridge then?
 
You can put a pacy CB next to him but his inability to play in a high line will always hold us back IMO.. He can't defend in 1v1 situations high up the pitch hence we have to play a reactive brand of football with our fullbacks and midfielders protecting him which means we can't effectively beat the press. He's not the only issue in that regard though but signing a aerially dominant CB who is also capable of defending high up the pitch in 1v1 situations should be a priority IMO which would allow us to play a more expansive game.
 
To his credit I thought he looked better today than he did around the time of the international break a couple weeks ago when he looked like a walking disaster (This is the first match I've gotten a chance to watch since then)
 
So because he isn't:lol: Pirlo his passing was bad? :lol: :lol: :lol: Yet another agenda. Blame the players who need to be blamed not the players who were the best on the field

I knew this would be said.
Sadly, we can't edit and clip the footage, but anyone that actually watches the game can see exactly what I mean.

I think the lady doth protest too much, and you are a massive Maguire fan. Well done.

If you setup to play out from the back, you do not have to be vintage Beckenbauer to be able to keep the play moving with sharp passes and variation.
Pass, Move, if you're Captain and the team is under the cosh then yes, you have to play line-splitting passes to the advanced midfielders, runners and into space.

Maguire was brought in as you may recall, because of his supposedly excellent ball-playing ability.
He simply isn't showing this regularly enough or reading the attacking play well-enough at this level. Slow in thought.

He made a couple of balls over the top to seek out Greenwood and Rashford, but his general passes are so deliberate in the attacking-sense that even a blind footballer could read them by the time he's taken to decide what to do.

No-one is expecting him to be Scholes or Pirlo; But his passing and slow-thinking dawdling on the ball and inability to understand the right pass, with the right weight to keep the pieces moving when he has so much time on the ball is a very grave concern for the style Ole wants us to play.

He has to be braver and improve and show us he won't be cowed if a few of his forward passes go astray and keep passing and moving and look for those spaces, midfielders and runners. Encapsulated when Maguire took on a shot in the final third that was quite frankly hilarious.
 
To his credit I thought he looked better today than he did around the time of the international break a couple weeks ago when he looked like a walking disaster (This is the first match I've gotten a chance to watch since then)

This he has improved on. Horrific experience for the lad.
 
On that second goal Bailly watches Son walk past him inside. Doesn't attempt to get close to him until after the ball is passed to him. Sure, Maguire should have stepped on the ball, but this is about defending. Blaming the guy who didn't commit a yellow card offense for the goal instead of blaming the guy who was supposed to be marking the goal scorer is nothing more than "agenda 101" against Maguire

On that 4th goal, Maguire is nearest to the crosser, so it is HIS job to go shut him down. Son starts his run from the left side of the field. Again, Bailly watches him make his run and then reacts too late. He lets Son get in front of him. Again, if you are blaming Maguire for going to close down the crosser when he's the closest defender and really want him to stay where he is and give him a free run, then I don't know what to say. This again was on Bailly. Son was his man. Son was the goal scorer. Amazing how you want to blame Maguire for his man making an assist, but give Bailly a free pass for not marking the goal scorer who was his man. And then you claim not to have an agenda? Give your head a shake...

Fml :lol:
 
You can put a pacy CB next to him but his inability to play in a high line will always hold us back IMO.. He can't defend in 1v1 situations high up the pitch hence we have to play a reactive brand of football with our fullbacks and midfielders protecting him which means we can't effectively beat the press. He's not the only issue in that regard though but signing a aerially dominant CB who is also capable of defending high up the pitch in 1v1 situations should be a priority IMO which would allow us to play a more expansive game.
There’s one of those at Roma I hear. English too so good for the homegrown quota.
 
The defence hasn't been bad since spurs. Only conceded own goals and penalty in 5 games.
 
There’s one of those at Roma I hear. English too so good for the homegrown quota.

Smalling is not, and has not at any point in his United career been the answer to anything. He was here for almost a decade. We all know what he brings to the table, and it's not enough. I can't believe we still have United fans pining for Smalling of all people.
 
No idea. I don't watch Serie A. I watch United and Maguire's passing was fine. Nobody in the back line is to blame for the result today. They were the best players on the pitch. The finger pointing needs to be aimed at players further up the pitch. Blame the players who need to be blamed, not the players who you have an agenda against. We lost 1-0 from a penalty a midfielder stupidly gave away and only only 7(2) shots against all game. The midfield and attack should be thanking the defense for keeping us in the game and should be praised not scapegoated...

Yes they are.

If a team presses you religiously then you have to step up. It was a decent criticism of Chris Smalling's suitability for when this is applied to us.

Tuanzebe is more appropriate for when this tactic is applied. Playing him you lose some of Maguire's defensive prowess and presence.
 
The defence hasn't been bad since spurs. Only conceded own goals and penalty in 5 games.
We’ve sacrificed any attacking intent to protect it. 2 goals and one point in four home games. And one of those was a penalty.
 
Sure you haven't :lol: :lol: :lol:

Arsenal were kept to only 7 shots (2 on target) while having most of the play. If you don't think that our defense played fantastic today then perhaps you should take up a different sport

Ah yes. This is exactly what people critiquing Maguire are saying. (sarc.)
Please actually read. His defensive side of the game is far better than his previous performances. Good. Well done. Have a junior G Man badge.
The pressing and attacking problems though cost us much in this game due to his lack of attacking acumen vs the time he had on the ball in various key phases of play.
This does not absolve other players poor performances.
 
People are so weird defenders defend and give the ball to the better players on the pitch to do something with, if people are expecting defenders to play key passes to open up teams I am at a loss.

There are very few defenders with a passing range that some on here are describing 92% completion is fine, what we need to look at is movement ahead of them and other players opening up channels for passes that allow for quicker passes, Arsenal press today was oppressive from the front 9 out of 10 times there were no options
 
Because they do have agendas against Maguire. i have more than proved that he isn't the problem yet he keeps getting scapegoated by muppets like you who can't think for yourself and just quote Mark Goldbridge

Lord help us if that bell is someone to quote as a fact giver!
 
My problem with maguire is his interview after the game. He is not a leader.

when asked what problem was he said can’t put his finger on it. Come on... say we were terrible say something acknowledging how poor we were. It’s complicit with the laizes faire attitude of the team.Just poor
 
People are so weird defenders defend and give the ball to the better players on the pitch to do something with, if people are expecting defenders to play key passes to open up teams I am at a loss.

There are very few defenders with a passing range that some on here are describing 92% completion is fine, what we need to look at is movement ahead of them and other players opening up channels for passes that allow for quicker passes, Arsenal press today was oppressive from the front 9 out of 10 times there were no options
But that's not why Mike Smalling was shown the door so we could break the record for him. He was supposed to be this modern ball playing defender.
 
People are so weird defenders defend and give the ball to the better players on the pitch to do something with, if people are expecting defenders to play key passes to open up teams I am at a loss.

There are very few defenders with a passing range that some on here are describing 92% completion is fine, what we need to look at is movement ahead of them and other players opening up channels for passes that allow for quicker passes, Arsenal press today was oppressive from the front 9 out of 10 times there were no options

Funnily enough Maguire made the same number of key passes that Bruno and Pogba did in today’s game.
 
People are so weird defenders defend and give the ball to the better players on the pitch to do something with, if people are expecting defenders to play key passes to open up teams I am at a loss.

There are very few defenders with a passing range that some on here are describing 92% completion is fine, what we need to look at is movement ahead of them and other players opening up channels for passes that allow for quicker passes, Arsenal press today was oppressive from the front 9 out of 10 times there were no options
Arsenal's press was effective because their midfield and back line stepped up everytime the forwards triggered the press which closed off the space hence cutting off passing lanes.
 
Well except those two games we scored 9 goals in.
We haven’t scored 9 goals at Old Trafford much less in 2 games. But I was referring to the league. We’ve scored 7 including Champions League. If you’re referring to it and the Newcastle game we had to bring Fred off for an attacking midfielder before we got three of those goals.
 
But that's not why Mike Smalling was shown the door so we could break the record for him. He was supposed to be this modern ball playing defender.

Exactly. Defensively we would have been better off sticking with Mike. But he was apparently the reason we were not playing progressive football and needed changing. If Tuanzebe can stay fit I would honestly prefer him and Lindelof and I dont really rate him either. This feels like such a waste of money signing, league record? and doesn't feel like an improvement.
 
Why count only home games? Seems disingenuous on your part.
Because that’s where are problems are. Two weeks running we’ve had home games where we surrendered any attacking initiative and even the Newcastle game we had to take off one of our defensive midfielders when we were drifting to another draw.
 
Because that’s where are problems are. Two weeks running we’ve had home games where we surrendered any attacking initiative and even the Newcastle game we had to take off one of our defensive midfielders when we were drifting to another draw.

We were playing Chelsea and Arsenal. Chelsea set up ultra defensively because they had been shipping goals and Arsenal now always set up ultra defensively and have the best defensive record in the league this season. I think you‘re reaching if you claim this sample is proof of your point, especially given we’ve scored 11 goals in the other 3 games since the international break.
 
We’ve sacrificed any attacking intent to protect it. 2 goals and one point in four home games. And one of those was a penalty.

But we scored 4 at Newcastle and 5 versus leipzig. Agree we were too cautious in Chelsea and arsenal games. If you gamble and are more ambitious you might win one and lose one. But you get 3 points not 1
 
We were playing Chelsea and Arsenal. Chelsea set up ultra defensively because they had been shipping goals and Arsenal now always set up ultra defensively and have the best defensive record in the league this season. I think you‘re reaching if you claim this sample is proof of your point, especially given we’ve scored 11 goals in the other 3 games since the international break.
We barely looked like scoring against them though. And we played both games in no rush to attack. It’s less the number of goals and more the lack of intent in those games that bothers me. Our attack is clearly our strength but two weeks running it’s been safety first. Mostly because our centre backs can’t run.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.