Sambob
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2013
- Messages
- 449
To be fair, if Sanchez is worth 600 billion or whatever then this is fine.
You make it sound like the player has no choice in the matter. What if he prefers Real? Woody should say f*ck it and kidnap him?
So your stance is that Levy would never sanction the sale of Kane for £200m cash because it would jeopardise the negotiations of a deal potentially worth £20m per year? That makes no sense.
No, I meant kidnap. Again, the player's wishes seem to be irrelevant to you. What if he would rather play for Real?By kidnap I assume you mean hijack the deal, in which case yes we should kidnap him.
I'm sure Levy will be more susceptible to the idea of losing Kane if offered a Prem proven goal scorer in return - Lukaku + £100 million would certainly give him food for thought.
Who cares what Neymar went for. Spurs won't be interested in "fair" - this is not a game of cricket. Spurs will only be interested in what gives them a massive gain/advantage ... and £200m in the prevailing circumstances doesn't provide that.
The aim is £400m over 20 years - citing just one year's worth of money is silly. Levy takes the long view.
Besides, this was merely one of several reasons why selling Kane this summer won't happen.
No, I meant kidnap. Again, the player's wishes seem to be irrelevant to you. What if he would rather play for Real?
Except I didn't say that. I asked you a question which you seem very reluctant to answer. Given that you haven't.You seem to be under the impression that a move to Real would be his ideal destination. What led you to believe that?
Except I didn't say that. I asked you a question which you seem very reluctant to answer. Given that you haven't.
Third time, what if Kane would rather play for Real?
October 2016Yeah when was that contract signed?
Christ.It's a pointless question, one that neither of us know the answer to.
What if he would prefer a move to Darlington?
October 2016
On the contrary, thinking of the headline number is what's silly.
Put it this way; if losing Kane had such a detrimental effect on your negotiating position that your huge deal came down to £300m over the same time period that's a cost of £5m per year.
You're saying Levy would reject a £200m cash payment because it could potentially cost £5m a year in a sponsorship deal?
No chance. Not to mention that Kane staying or leaving would not swing a deal that much.
Christ.
When that 200 hunna mill email drops in, Kane is gone mate.I've already given several other reasons why Kane won't be sold this summer. Besides, £5m x 20 years = £100m. And there are other commercial considerations regarding the new stadium besides naming rights.
I do know the answer, as does everyone else with an IQ above single digits. If Kane would rather play for Real then Woody 'stepping in' will be completely irrelevant.Explain the logic behind asking someone a question that you do not know the answer to yourself?
There's one main reason you're forgetting. When Real or Barca (especially Real) want their player and fork out enough money, that's it, maybe not this summer, or next January, but certainly it will happen. This isn't just a Spurs thing, I know if Real came in with 100m for DDG that we'd let him go. Chelsea fans know that if they came in with £150m+ for Hazard they'd let him go. Pool tried their best to stop Barca getting Coutinho but once the price was high enough, they had to let him go, only one window later. The only English club capable of warding Real and Barca off is City because they're just so damn rich that they can let the contract run down or double the player's wages. Utd are arguably at that level too but I'm still not foolish enough to think that some of our players wouldn't prefer to be at Real and that we'd have to eventually let them go.I've already given several other reasons why Kane won't be sold this summer. Besides, £5m x 20 years = £100m. And there are other commercial considerations regarding the new stadium besides naming rights.
I do know the answer, as does everyone else with an IQ above single digits. If Kane would rather play for Real then Woody 'stepping in' will be completely irrelevant.
Where did I say Real is his chosen destination? What is wrong with you?So you know for absolute certainty that Harry Kane's preffered destination is that of Real Madrid. Prove it.
There's one main reason you're forgetting. When Real or Barca (especially Real) want their player and fork out enough money, that's it, maybe not this summer, or next January, but certainly it will happen. This isn't just a Spurs thing, I know if Real came in with 100m for DDG that we'd let him go. Chelsea fans know that if they came in with £150m+ for Hazard they'd let him go. Pool tried their best to stop Barca getting Coutinho but once the price was high enough, they had to let him go, only one window later. The only English club capable of warding Real and Barca off is City because they're just so damn rich that they can let the contract run down or double the player's wages. Utd are arguably at that level too but I'm still not foolish enough to think that some of our players wouldn't prefer to be at Real and that we'd have to eventually let them go.
If Real offer enough money and Kane wants to go there (what top striker wouldn't?) then they'll get him.
So you know for absolute certainty that Harry Kane's prefered destination is that of Real Madrid. Prove it.
I mean, they'll still get him this summer if they offer 200m+, but keep thinking what you want.I'm not forgetting anything. I'm talking about this summer.
Mate are you actually reading his posts?
I wouldn't say desperate but the lure of playing for Madrid might prove too strong. And who would blame him?No, but most United fans seem to think he is desperate to leave.
Where did I say Real is his chosen destination? What is wrong with you?
that's 99% of a fecking forum. Maybe you should just go read the BBC if you only want to deal in cold hard facts.I know what he is tryng to say, what if he would prefer a move to Real rather than United. I find "what if" arguments to be completely pointless because they have no basis for fact.
Neither of us know where Kane wishes to ply his trade after spurs, so what is the point in speculating?
I wouldn't say desperate but the lure of playing for Madrid might prove too strong. And who would blame him?
I don't think that's true. personally I'd say if Kane stays in England he probably wants to stay at Spurs, if they pay him enough obviously, but the allure of Madrid is massive for just about every player and I do find it hard to believe that he wouldn't want to go there given the opportunity.No, but most United fans seem to think he is desperate to leave.
I didn't imply anything. I asked you a straight forward question that you refused to answer.You implied it, in a manner of speaking, either that you're basing an opinion on speculation. Neither of which are favourable.
£400m over 20 years for stadium naming rights is complete fantasy anyway. It would make it far and away the biggest stadium naming rights in the history of sports.On the contrary, thinking of the headline number is what's silly.
Put it this way; if losing Kane had such a detrimental effect on your negotiating position that your huge deal came down to £300m over the same time period that's a cost of £5m per year.
You're saying Levy would reject a £200m cash payment because it could potentially cost £5m a year in a sponsorship deal?
No chance. Not to mention that Kane staying or leaving would not swing a deal that much.
£400m over 20 years for stadium naming rights is complete fantasy anyway. It would make it far and away the biggest stadium naming rights in the history of sports.
£400m over 20 years for stadium naming rights is complete fantasy anyway. It would make it far and away the biggest stadium naming rights in the history of sports.
On the contrary, thinking of the headline number is what's silly.
Put it this way; if losing Kane had such a detrimental effect on your negotiating position that your huge deal came down to £300m over the same time period that's a cost of £5m per year.
You're saying Levy would reject a £200m cash payment because it could potentially cost £5m a year in a sponsorship deal?
No chance. Not to mention that Kane staying or leaving would not swing a deal that much.
I didn't imply anything. I asked you a straight forward question that you refused to answer.
Inflation, inflation, inflation.
Moreover, it will feature Europe's largest single-tier stand, be state-of-the-art, be the newest stadium on the block and unique to boot, with the world's first dividing retractable pitch. How many other club stadiums host both football and NFL football?