Mindhunter
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2013
- Messages
- 3,697
Fixed.Absolutely no chance that Spurs could afford any of those big names ... so a happy coincidence then.
Fixed.Absolutely no chance that Spurs could afford any of those big names ... so a happy coincidence then.
Good job they’ll stick to being a feeder club then.Absolutely no chance that Spurs would want any of those big names ... so a happy coincidence then.
I really can’t see United just standing a side and watching as Real moves for him.
I think we would throw our hat in the ring.
If he became determined to leave, he will choose where he goes.
The money, let alone glory, suggests it’s just a matter of time.
He could be the highest paid player in the league. Should be.
What do Spurs want exactly then? You seem to think Spurs are in some way 'above' signing that type of player, however it's not got you anywhere in the last couple of decades. The simple truth is that Spurs can't afford such players, can't tempt them to join you and raise the profile of the club. Don't forget you overpaid for an ageing 'star' in Soldado.
Spurs generally want a mixture of:
(a) Young players brought up through our academy ranks (and/or young prospects signed from other clubs) that we can develop further - recent-ish examples would include Kane, Winks, Eriksen, Alli, Dier, Walker, Rose, Sanchez, Foyth.
(b) More experienced but talented players aged 26 or younger. Recent-ish examples would include Wanyama, Vertonghen, Alderweireld, Lloris, Dembele.
Of course there can be exceptions to every rule, but that's the general profile. And of course not every signing works out, but many have.
You're right, that Spurs currently can't afford to sign ageing big name players who demand huge wages, but I don't imagine that the club especially wants to ... so, as I've said, that's a happy coincidence. It's not a question of being 'above' such signings, it's just that it doesn't fit with our strategic model.
This strategic model involves first putting in place the off-pitch foundational building blocks for long term viability and success - hence the new training centre and new stadium complex. This in turn has meant, due to the huge investment involved (not far short of £1 billion), keeping a strict rein on our wage structure and a low net transfer spend, but at the same time seeking to remain competitive on the pitch until such time as the increased income from our new stadium (etc) allows for greater investment in players.
All in all, this strategy has worked well so far (IMO). Next season will see the new stadium open, coupled with further work on the surrounding 'complex' (mainly an adjacent hotel and serviced apartments).
We should arrive at this point with a reasonably low debt burden, due to all the years of prior austerity and diverting most of the available spare money into the various building constructions works. And thereafter, we can slowly begin to relax our wage structure and spend more on transfers if needed.
LOL. Put this in the bin with the others. Kane isn't going anywhere. How many pages are wasted on Redcafe linking Kane with other clubs, mainly Madrid?
Spurs generally want a mixture of:
(a) Young players brought up through our academy ranks (and/or young prospects signed from other clubs) that we can develop further - recent-ish examples would include Kane, Winks, Eriksen, Alli, Dier, Walker, Rose, Sanchez, Foyth.
(b) More experienced but talented players aged 26 or younger. Recent-ish examples would include Wanyama, Vertonghen, Alderweireld, Lloris, Dembele.
Of course there can be exceptions to every rule, but that's the general profile. And of course not every signing works out, but many have.
Yeah, you're right there. Being winners and all
Maybe not this summer, but give him a year or two without trophies or CL football, and he's on his way.
Arsenal have been thinking this for 10 years. Spurs will need to leap frog 2 Manchester clubs (greater spending power), Chelsea (greater spending power), Liverpool. Spurs winning the title will be a miracle.Nah, can't see it. He'll stay at Spurs for his career and I'm sure with Kane leading the line Spurs WILL win stuff over the next few seasons.
City's dominance this season won't last forever and there will be opportunities to win the title and trophies for Spurs.
Arsenal have been thinking this for 10 years. Spurs will need to leap frog 2 Manchester clubs (greater spending power), Chelsea (greater spending power), Liverpool. Spurs winning the title will be a miracle.
I wouldn't say it's impossible - very difficult yes but we have the bones of a superb team already. We need to make significant investment to bulk up the squad depth and probably look to one or two new first team players. I believe we will do this in the summer. I'm expecting big contracts to be signed by our most important players and for the club to make some pretty big signings also. Will it be enough? No idea but we have as good a chance as any team in the top 6 imo.
Nah, can't see it. He'll stay at Spurs for his career and I'm sure with Kane leading the line Spurs WILL win stuff over the next few seasons.
City's dominance this season won't last forever and there will be opportunities to win the title and trophies for Spurs.
I really don't think you've got the funds to keep your stars happy and expand the squad. I think your best chance is to follow the Barca model of having a handsomely paid core of 18 players and then a fringe made up of bargains and academy lads.
Arsenal have been thinking this for 10 years. Spurs will need to leap frog 2 Manchester clubs (greater spending power), Chelsea (greater spending power), Liverpool. Spurs winning the title will be a miracle.
I really don't think you've got the funds to keep your stars happy and expand the squad. I think your best chance is to follow the Barca model of having a handsomely paid core of 18 players and then a fringe made up of bargains and academy lads.
You could literally say that about your first point.Spurs leapfrogged both Manchester clubs last season when they still had more spending power?
Just because United are above Spurs in the league this season don't think it's a foregone conclusion every season. Spurs will be a force again next season when they are back at WHL.
Seasons/years have a way of flying by. Spurs have been on the cusp for 4/5 years now and have nothing to show for it. Big summer for them. If he leaves then they'll be a worse team than Arsenal again but if he stays for another year then they absolutely have to bring in a couple of big players.
Personally I think he'll go this summer. Spurs can't compete financially. He'll get double/treble what he's on at spurs and that can't be turned down
You could literally say that about your first point.
Spurs leapfrogged both Manchester clubs last season when they still had more spending power?
Just because United are above Spurs in the league this season don't think it's a foregone conclusion every season. Spurs will be a force again next season when they are back at WHL.
So your post was pointless?Yes, exactly. Any of the top 6 can finish anywhere on any given season. As we have seen in recent seasons, splashing out hundreds of millions like United have done, does not guarantee you finishing above Spurs, or Chelsea or anyone else.
There is absolutely no way Kane leaves this summer. Don't even waste brain energy predicting it will happen, you are so so wrong. Kane will sign a new even bigger and longer contract, he is going nowhere.
There is absolutely zero evidence Spurs will spend in the summer. Where will all this money come from? Champions league football isn't even guaranteed yet. Your board are notoriously tight. You also have Dembele, Vertonghen into the last year of contracts, and can do a Sanchez/Ozil.I wouldn't say it's impossible - very difficult yes but we have the bones of a superb team already. We need to make significant investment to bulk up the squad depth and probably look to one or two new first team players. I believe we will do this in the summer. I'm expecting big contracts to be signed by our most important players and for the club to make some pretty big signings also. Will it be enough? No idea but we have as good a chance as any team in the top 6 imo.
Spurs leapfrogged both Manchester clubs last season when they still had more spending power?
Just because United are above Spurs in the league this season don't think it's a foregone conclusion every season. Spurs will be a force again next season when they are back at WHL.
Sounds like you are comparing apples to oranges.You're right, that Spurs currently can't afford to sign ageing big name players who demand huge wages, but I don't imagine that the club especially wants to ... so, as I've said, that's a happy coincidence. It's not a question of being 'above' such signings, it's just that it doesn't fit with our strategic model.
There is absolutely zero evidence Spurs will spend in the summer. Where will all this money come from? Champions league football isn't even guaranteed yet. Your board are notoriously tight. You also have Dembele, Vertonghen into the last year of contracts, and can do a Sanchez/Ozil.
Lamela, Son, Erisken, Alderweireld expire 2020. If you miss CL, are these lads definately going to sign? United would love Eriksen/Dembele? Alderweireld (already rebelling)
So the 2 Manchester clubs just spent another 150M - 200m more net. Its cumulative. How are Spurs gonna overtake a United who have just added arguably the best attacker in the league, and will then spend another 150m net on gaps in their squad? you have to be realistic. Its like when Arsenal were trying to compete with Chelsea. They would only manage when Chelsea underperformed. It will be much tougher for SPurs to take points off the manchester clubs with their continued squad building.
I've heard they're hijacking Chelsea's deal for Ashley Barnes.Just going by information doing the rounds on Spurs forums - the talk is that with the new stadium (yes i know) the club really want to make a big statement in the summer that they are entering the big leagues. That will mean new contracts and one or two big name signings.
There is absolutely zero evidence Spurs will spend in the summer. Where will all this money come from? Champions league football isn't even guaranteed yet. Your board are notoriously tight. You also have Dembele, Vertonghen into the last year of contracts, and can do a Sanchez/Ozil.
Lamela, Son, Erisken, Alderweireld expire 2020. If you miss CL, are these lads definately going to sign? United would love Eriksen/Dembele? Alderweireld (already rebelling)
So the 2 Manchester clubs just spent another 150M - 200m more net. Its cumulative. How are Spurs gonna overtake a United who have just added arguably the best attacker in the league, and will then spend another 150m net on gaps in their squad? you have to be realistic. Its like when Arsenal were trying to compete with Chelsea. They would only manage when Chelsea underperformed. It will be much tougher for SPurs to take points off the manchester clubs with their continued squad building.
You didn't win anything in the last two seasons, and what happened in those seasons has no bearing on the composition of the league as it is now, or as it will be next season. If it did, Leicester would be in the top four... because of what happened two seasons ago. Doesn't work like that (obviously). You came second and third. What is there to miss? Spurs never have been, and never will be, a bigger club than United.and as if the last two seasons never happened.
Spurs leapfrogged both Manchester clubs last season when they still had more spending power?
Just because United are above Spurs in the league this season don't think it's a foregone conclusion every season. Spurs will be a force again next season when they are back at WHL.
"Willing to prepare"
What's next, "confident of being willing to prepare"?