jackofalltrades
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2012
- Messages
- 2,137
When will he start doing he business for England ?
His driven low shooting technique is 1 of the best I have seen.
The way he can hit it so hard, but keep it daisy-cutter low and into the corners is a special ability. He loves to drop off the defensive line, pick up the ball and smash it hard and low.
He was never my favourite striker, but as a poacher you just cannot argue his numbers. If he can stay injury free I can see him scoring 30 goals a season pretty regularly.
I wouldn't describe him as a poacher though as he scores all types of goals. He is an all round striker.
His driven low shooting technique is 1 of the best I have seen.
The way he can hit it so hard, but keep it daisy-cutter low and into the corners is a special ability. He loves to drop off the defensive line, pick up the ball and smash it hard and low.
He was never my favourite striker, but as a poacher you just cannot argue his numbers. If he can stay injury free I can see him scoring 30 goals a season pretty regularly.
When will he start doing he business for England ?
That along with the early baldness and lisp are part of his charm. Agree that he's highly likable.Weirdly he's a slightly under rated English footballer. Dunno why, maybe his shovel face.
Some more Harry Kane stats:
* Has as many PL hat-tricks as Ronaldo + Bergkamp + Zola + Diego Costa + Cantona combined
* Has averaged a goal every 92 minutes in the Premier League - when you consider stoppage time that's fractionally better than a goal every league game on average.
* Is currently the top PL scorer despite playing 1,000 minutes less than both Romelu Lukaku and Alexis Sanchez.
Weirdly he's a slightly under rated English footballer. Dunno why, maybe his shovel face.
And?
Bergkamp and Zola weren't pure strikers and Ronaldo (not a pure striker either, not at United anyway)was completely different class at his age: 42 goals for the CL title and the PL title. Kane has been a flop in Europe and internatiionally so far. And his best season falls short of the best seasons of any of the mentioned players.
That's just not true, certainly in terms of goal scoring.
But I don't mean only goals. To measure the quality of Bergkamp or Zola or Cantona only in goals is stupid. And Costa outscored Kane and was beter than Kane at Atleti - in a much more defensive set-up.
4 goals in a pretty meaningless game mean nothing.
His stats in the PL are excellent, but that's only the PL. Before doing it in the CL and with England, he'll be what he is now: not a top 10 forward in the world.
That's because he's an exceptional talent.
So you are happy to judge his game away from his goalscoring against the types of players he is not like (Zola, Bergkamp, Cantona, Ronaldo) and judge him not on his obvious strength and then bring up Costa, a player in his prime who even so has not matched Kane's goal scoring record. Clutching at straws.
Huh. I have problems finding 10 better forwards in the world myself..
MSN if you call them all forwards is 3...
Ronaldo + Benzema
Lewandowski
Higuain
Aubemayang
That`s 8. I`d say all of them are undebateable.
After that I`d say Kane must be close to being the next in line.
Contenders:
Ibrahimovic (scoring more in weaker league, less in PL). Can`t say he`s currently better than Kane IMO.
Griezmann, not an out and out forward, 22 league goals this season, 60 last 3. (compared to Kane`s 26 this season and 72 last 3), but debateable.
Who else? Dybala? Doesn`t come close in scoring...
Aguero, Possibly. Not this season for certain.
Sanchez, possibly, been comfortably outscored by Kane last 2 years though.
Costa. No.
Cavani, slightly higher scoring average in significantly worse league.
If I were to make ranking right now I`d put him 10th (behind Griezmann), with 5 of those in Barca & Real and the best forward in the PL.
I guess you can aruge any of the "contenders", but just as easy arguing Kane is as good as any of them IMO.
Glaston was happy to judge his goalscoring stats against players who weren't out and out strikers in the first place.
Strikers or not strikers, any of the mentioned players had better individual seasons than Kane. Is this news to you?
As regards Costa, his last season at Atleti was beter than any of the Kane seasons so far? That's pretty obvious as well. And you call it clutching at straws. How come?
So because someone else compared different types of players it's ok for you to do it? Also that's great about Costa's one season in his career when he scored currently 1 league goal more than Kane this season (with Kane having one more game to play) despite playing 6 games more than Kane has that season. If that's honestly your argument then I think you are struggling.
And?
Bergkamp and Zola weren't pure strikers and Ronaldo (not a pure striker either, not at United anyway)was completely different class at his age: 42 goals for the CL title and the PL title. Kane has been a flop in Europe and internatiionally so far. And his best season falls short of the best seasons of any of the mentioned players.
?
You can't really see the difference between scoring as many league goals as Messi and Ronaldo and leading Atleti to the league title and to the CL final and scoring many meaningless goals and leading Spurs to 2nd in the PL and to nothing in Europe? Good for you then.
2 goals in 3 CL matches this season. Spurs underwhelmed but how do those stats fit with him being a "flop" individually?
We are not comparing Athletico and Spurs here though are we. We are comparing two goal scorers and Kane has a better goal scoring record than Costa. I'm really not sure why you picked Costa as the striker to compare him with as you would have already known this.
Funny you should say that. I was at WHL in December 2014 and watched us play Spurs in an uninspiring 0-0 draw (typical LvG borefest). On the pitch was Rooney, RvP and Falcao. But the striker who stood out to me that day was a young Harry Kane.The reason I've personally never thought of him as absolutely top tier is because until the other day, I can't remember anything of note that he's done against us. Maybe I've forgotten something, but in most of the games I've seen him play against us, he's been anonymous, sometimes downright bad. I don't watch him every week though.
I argued that any of the mentioned players had better individual seasons than Kane.
I have nothing against Kane. He may go on to become a better player than Costa and Zola. He can't become better than Bergkamp and Cantona, IMO. And Ronaldo is on a completely different level.
You have doubts whether Griezmann is a better forward than Kane?
Bale?
Aguero? Not great this season? OK, but then Mbappe had a better season than Kane because he did it at the highest level - in the CL and Kane failed there.
Müller? Not good this season but was better than Kane in any of the previous seasons.
Cavani has scored 50+ goals this season, Kane 30+. Wouldn't say that Kane had a better season. Ligue 1 is worse than the PL but not by that much. Monaco shat on Spurs and then beat City.
Maybe next year then, in Russia. Our top young talents don't always do well with the national team, I wonder why ? Kane and Rashford up front, surely that can't fail ?He scored 5 in his first 11 caps (including a top class goal away at the world champions). His awful Euros brings his goal average down a lot and he's only played once for England since the tournament.
It's worth remembering that Shearer's international record was pretty crap until Euro 96.
That'd be like offering £90m tbh.
BTW, Kane started in both games vs Gent. And scored. An OG. He wasn't really good in Europe this season. Next season he'll have a chance to shine.
Spurs have never really taken the EL too seriously anyway. Will be interested to see how he fares in the CL presuming Spurs fare better in it than they did this season.
I remember that game and literally remember nothing about Kane. I just remember us missing a hatful of chances in the first half, and a couple of good ones in the second. I remember a couple of other games in which Smalling had him in his pocket. He was awful in the game at Old Trafford this season.Funny you should say that. I was at WHL in December 2014 and watched us play Spurs in an uninspiring 0-0 draw (typical LvG borefest). On the pitch was Rooney, RvP and Falcao. But the striker who stood out to me that day was a young Harry Kane.
If Kane stays healthy, he's nailed on to score 20+ goals a season for the foreseeable future.
Bizarrely i think that's part of the reason he is underappreciated in England. He's goofy looking, has a lisp and didn't have a stellar youth career. You'd think things like that wouldn't matter, but hey ho, we live in a materialistic, fake time on this planet and if you don't have some sort of x-factor about you, you'll be judged unfairly. I have no doubt if Kane stays relatively injury free, he will rack up record numbers(where ever he plays).Nope it's very harsh. He's much more creative than people give him credit for. He has a poachers instinct like any top striker needs, but his holdup play, his touch and passing and general physicality are all really, really good.
Weirdly he's a slightly under rated English footballer. Dunno why, maybe his shovel face.
One of my favourite players in the league which is saying something as I find Spurs intensely dislikable.
Also have a soft spot for Son.