Harry Kane | Bayern Munich player

Anyone else think it's odd spurs are reported as bidding for Barnes, Madison and Reyes when they're averaging 70m net spend. Kane money?
 
Anyone else think it's odd spurs are reported as bidding for Barnes, Madison and Reyes when they're averaging 70m net spend. Kane money?
Or negotiating to try and bring Kulasevski price down/find alternatives. I don't think they'll sign both Barnes and Maddison. Reyes depends how interested we are, as even in current straits we're likely more flexible on price compared to Spurs. They could also be making enquiries to line up purchases in the event of Madrid coming in and offering them close to 100m for Kane. They've made it stubbornly clear that Kane won't be sold to PL clubs unless it's the kind of price that makes Fernandez look like Brighton's purchase of Caicedo.
 
Basically exactly this.

If Kane is planning to leave next summer, it makes zero sense for Spurs to not sell him. Trying to replace him with a 100M is a lot easier than trying to replace him with nada.

I can think of only 2 possibilities:

1) Levy genuinely believes he can get Kane to sign an extension

2) Levy will sell him eventually in this window. And these are just negotiating tactics to get as much as he can.
Or:
3) he wants to sell, but not to a premier league team.

I think that is his preference, and if that doesn't work out, he'll try one of the above 2
 
Does he now? :lol:

Clearly he doesn’t know our little bald owner. Levy cares only about 1 thing, £, he will have calculated and understood Kane’s value to United. I genuinely believe if you signed Harry you could win the title, so has Levy. If you want him, pay for him.
 
Clearly he doesn’t know our little bald owner. Levy cares only about 1 thing, £, he will have calculated and understood Kane’s value to United. I genuinely believe if you signed Harry you could win the title, so has Levy. If you want him, pay for him.

If he’s done that calculation, then he’s doing the wrong maths. The question he should be looking at is the value to Spurs of one season of Kane. For example, if that figure is £50m (and that’s a very generous figure I think), then selling for £100m is a no-brainer.
 
Clearly he doesn’t know our little bald owner. Levy cares only about 1 thing, £, he will have calculated and understood Kane’s value to United. I genuinely believe if you signed Harry you could win the title, so has Levy. If you want him, pay for him.
Or just sign him for free next year because Levy will price him out of a move
 
If he’s done that calculation, then he’s doing the wrong maths. The question he should be looking at is the value to Spurs of one season of Kane. For example, if that figure is £50m (and that’s a very generous figure I think), then selling for £100m is a no-brainer.

He cost us sweet feck all? Are u dense or do we need to spell it out for you? U are equating Levy’s l price to what he is worth to us? Levy is equating it on what he is worth to you…. Kane cost us feck all, if he leaves for nothing he cost us; zip. You do the math.
 
Again il repeat what hat I have said, Levy is not Spurs, he is not a Spurs fan, he gives feck all about Spurs, but he is winning, and profit. At that he excels, if you don’t see that your pretty thick.
 
Basically exactly this.

If Kane is planning to leave next summer, it makes zero sense for Spurs to not sell him. Trying to replace him with a 100M is a lot easier than trying to replace him with nada.

I can think of only 2 possibilities:

1) Levy genuinely believes he can get Kane to sign an extension

2) Levy will sell him eventually in this window. And these are just negotiating tactics to get as much as he can.
I can think of a third, retaining Kane may kelp attract other players they want to sign for them
 
He cost us sweet feck all? Are u dense or do we need to spell it out for you? U are equating Levy’s l price to what he is worth to us? Levy is equating it on what he is worth to you…. Kane cost us feck all, if he leaves for nothing he cost us; zip. You do the math.

That is one hell of an easy way to look at it. As of now he is an asset who can give you good money if you move him on. Next year he will move for free. Do the maths mate, you stand to lose the asset for nothing.

Levy will sell imo.
 
That is one hell of an easy way to look at it. As of now he is an asset who can give you good money if you move him on. Next year he will move for free. Do the maths mate, you stand to lose the asset for nothing.

Levy will sell imo.
Yeah, but they will have had another year of winning nothing and hanging around the Europa League places, so who's the real winner eh?
 
Clearly he doesn’t know our little bald owner. Levy cares only about 1 thing, £, he will have calculated and understood Kane’s value to United. I genuinely believe if you signed Harry you could win the title, so has Levy. If you want him, pay for him.
I don't think you've watched very much of us if you think we're Harry Kane away from a title. He's good but he ain't that bloody good. We're miles off it in our play.
 
He cost us sweet feck all? Are u dense or do we need to spell it out for you? U are equating Levy’s l price to what he is worth to us? Levy is equating it on what he is worth to you…. Kane cost us feck all, if he leaves for nothing he cost us; zip. You do the math.

Ok, a simple concept I didn’t think I’d need to explain but let’s try an example. I develop a fantastic piece of software I can sell for £100m now. However, I do nothing with it, thinking it’s better to wait, but technology doesn’t develop the way I expected and in 1 years time it’s worth nothing. Have I lost £100m?
 
Yeah, but they will have had another year of winning nothing and hanging around the Europa League places, so who's the real winner eh?

Well the money is a sure thing and you can invest them. A player who might be very ready to go could be bad to keep. But it’s not definite anything. I just know that personally I would sell him.
 
Yeah but u said he is easy to deal with, you had to tap, tap, tap then ambush his move to City, and pay a *fine*…. How is that easy to deal with?
There was never a move to City. They tried to hijack our deal with an (at the time) eye-watering £35m bid for a player I believe even Levy was only asking £30m and a bit of change for. Levy accepted, but Betba (understandably) didn't want to go to some mid-table side. It did spur (heh) us to up our bid sufficiently for Levy to accept it though.
 
the one thing Levy is not, is an idiot. He knows this only too well - the issue seems to be this face-saving standoff everyone at Spurs is in the middle of. It's probably good sense to just leave them to it for now, but I'd love to see the reaction to us putting in a realistic bid, say 70-80m. It would bring things to a head one way the other.

Indeed.

Kane has given them his best years and may now not win any major trophies, even if he moves on. The PL record goal scorer will be something he rightly covets. Why not accept he's done a good job and let him go for a reasonable market figure.

You could argue that Levy is, in fact, not the mastermind some make him out to be. He's played hardball for years and they've won nothing. He can't attract big managers anymore (with Conte, who's highly strung at the best of times, the only recent exception) and the better players will swerve the club if there are better offers. They're in a worse position now than they have been for years and without Kane they're mid-table fodder.
 
Your all thinking I accept Levy’s ways, I don’t he has won with us, he has made a fortune of us and Kane, if Kane leaves on a free he still wins. The club is secure in a way that suits him, again ENIC have only invested about £40m of thier own cash in Tottenham the rest is in loans in the clubs name. Our owners have litterally nothing to loose. £40m in 20 odd years ffs. Your all saying the same thing City fans said last year, IMO Harry will not leave this summer.
 
Rather use the apparent Mount funds and add in more to try and get Kane.

I'd rather Kane for 100m than Mount for 60m.

Not sure if Levy would sell for 100m to a PL rival.
 
Rather use the apparent Mount funds and add in more to try and get Kane.

I'd rather Kane for 100m than Mount for 60m.

Not sure if Levy would sell for 100m to a PL rival.
Do think Levy would sell to PL @ £100m ….though realistically imagine £70 - £80m.
 
Rather use the apparent Mount funds and add in more to try and get Kane.

I'd rather Kane for 100m than Mount for 60m.

Not sure if Levy would sell for 100m to a PL rival.

Yeah we can find someone else in that midfield whereas Kane is easily best striker. Unfortunately though we have ended interest so that idea is academic now
 
So you would sacrifice getting an Onana/Maignan/Costa to sign him then because clearly we couldn't do both
If we can't do more than one big transfer in a summer we might as well call ourselves Luton Town - you'll also see that earlier in this thread, I've said I was presuming we'd been bought by proper owners. And we could find the first £40m by not buying somewhat-ordinary Chelsea midfielders...
 
Last edited:
Don't read the guardian, never did, especially when they had their racist chant at our badge. As for making an offer, Kane would have to be agreeable to a move to United. This has never been reported ever even by Davie's Auntie's Taxi driver. Now the conservation clearly changes if behind the scene he tells United he wants to come to us but clearly that hasn't happened. So why would you bid ? for paper talk?. Levy isn't selling so only Kane submitting a transfer request changes the narrative.
My guess is that if we made our interest official, Kane would seek the move. He very clearly wants out and has also never said he want to move abroad. So, again I say: we'll only know if we make a bid. My it seems we are not going to now. so the mods might as well close this thread
 
I love how people think that if Qatar buys us they'll splash 300, 400 million right away.