Hargreaves vs. Carrick, Feadingseagulls vs. Noodle, Chief (Bayern Fan!) vs. Logic

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hargreaves is not better than Mascherano. He can run around a bit more, but that's about it.

And no, this isn't me saying that Hargreaves is shit or what not, I'm just saying that Mascherano is better.

mascherano's clearly much better, he may be boring but he's one of the most effective midfielders around
 
mascherano's clearly much better, he may be boring but he's one of the most effective midfielders around

Too early to make any fair comparison. Mascherano was spectacularly shit in his first season in the Premier League. If we're gonna compare like with like, then Hargreaves is the better player.

This may or may not turn out to be true but let's not be so hasty to make unfair comparisons between one of our players and one of our rivals'. Otherwise you risk another Captain Sensible/Dirk Kuyt scenario ;)
 
mascherano's clearly much better, he may be boring but he's one of the most effective midfielders around

True, he'd still probably get slated though if we have him instead of Hargreaves. We'd have to have a player like Cambiasso, who is equally adequate at defending and going forward to satisfy caftards.
 
True, he'd still probably get slated though if we have him instead of Hargreaves. We'd have to have a player like Cambiasso, who is equally adequate at defending and going forward to satisfy caftards.

Correct, the Roy Keane syndrome sadly
 
True, he'd still probably get slated though if we have him instead of Hargreaves. We'd have to have a player like Cambiasso, who is equally adequate at defending and going forward to satisfy caftards.

Correct, the Roy Keane syndrome sadly

Not true at all.

I don't expect Hargreaves to be like Keane at all, I just expect him to be better than what he is at the moment.

Personally I would have loved to have seen Mascherano at United, but hey-ho, that's football.
 
Too early to make any fair comparison. Mascherano was spectacularly shit in his first season in the Premier League. If we're gonna compare like with like, then Hargreaves is the better player.

He's not

This may or may not turn out to be true but let's not be so hasty to make unfair comparisons between one of our players and one of our rivals'. Otherwise you risk another Captain Sensible/Dirk Kuyt scenario ;)

I thought he was a better player than he is, I never said he was better than our players

I call it how I see it, irrespective of who they play for. What's the point doing otherwise? I know I support United, I don't feel the need to prove it to a bunch of blokes I don't know by pretending all rival players are crap and all ours are amazing.

True, he'd still probably get slated though if we have him instead of Hargreaves. We'd have to have a player like Cambiasso, who is equally adequate at defending and going forward to satisfy caftards.

I'd agree with them though. Much rather a player with more strings to his bow, who can attack and defend. It's not just Keano, United have had loads of midfielders of that ilk, Edwards, Crerrand, Moses, Robbo, Ince, Keane. Dull specialist defensive midfielders have not usually been our way.
 
I don't think there's that much to choose between Mascherano and Hargreaves. Mascherano's probably a bit better, but he's a player Liverpool don't need, and it actually fecks them up a bit not playing Alonso and Gerrard as a regular midfield pairing in the league.

I'm glad Mascherano isn't at United, anyway, even though a couple of years ago I probably wouldn't have said that.
 
I'd agree with them though. Much rather a player with more strings to his bow, who can attack and defend. It's not just Keano, United have had loads of midfielders of that ilk, Edwards, Crerrand, Moses, Robbo, Ince, Keane. Dull specialist defensive midfielders have not usually been our way.

True. That sums up my opinion.
 
I'd agree with them though. Much rather a player with more strings to his bow, who can attack and defend. It's not just Keano, United have had loads of midfielders of that ilk, Edwards, Crerrand, Moses, Robbo, Ince, Keane. Dull specialist defensive midfielders have not usually been our way.

Who wouldnt though?

The problem is they are so rare in todays game, there are only a handful of Cambiassos and Essiens out there.
 
I suppose Nobby Stiles is an exception

I don't think there's that much to choose between Mascherano and Hargreaves. Mascherano's probably a bit better, but he's a player Liverpool don't need, and it actually fecks them up a bit not playing Alonso and Gerrard as a regular midfield pairing in the league.

I'm glad Mascherano isn't at United, anyway, even though a couple of years ago I probably wouldn't have said that.

Same here. In fact I didn't even want him then. I watched him at the WC and thought he was nothing like the sort of player you'd want at United. Mostly he just lays it off five yards.

Who wouldnt though?

The problems are they are so rare in todays game, there are only a handful of Cambiassos and Essiens out there.

Yeah, that's true.

Is Cambiasso that good?
 
Mascherano is a bit different to Hargreaves though, imo he is better defensively, both positioning and tackling, his slide tackles are usually spot on whereas Hargreaves stays on his feet and tends to foul alot. Hargreaves might have a better passing range although he hasn't shown it yet, and he is very quick and should be able to bomb forward. Again he hasn't shown much of this yet, might be still trying to settle or restricted by tactics. But since both are DM, solid no nonsense defending should be the top priority.
 
After the wake of Mascherano signing for Liverpool and then reading a few threads over the last few months such as Hargreaves one signing to many and Hargreaves is not the next Roy Keane I thought i'd put a few points up and see if i could bring some clarity to this matter!
Lets jog our memories back to the season before last. Our centre midfield pairing was Giggs and O'shea as Scholes was out (eye injury) and Fletcher was getting abuse from all quarters. We badly needed a centre midfielder that much was evident! Compared to the league champions Chelsea our midfield pool of players were a very poor comparision.
The following season we bought Carrick who was slightly over priced and we tried to also buy Hargreaves. Carrick came in and the Hargreaves signing was delayed, Carrick's impact was not individually spectacular but he forged a good understanding with Scholes and his passing and positioning sense raised the levels of the team by increasing the tempo of our attacks and also by shielding the back four, he offered us some defensive protection we'd been missing since Keane departed to Celtic.
That season we were fortunate enough to keep the partnership of Scholes and Carrick going for the majority of the season, that was a massive factor in the success we enjoyed.
Fast forward this season we now have cover for those 2 positions and i suspect we will need it as Scholes is not getting any younger, Hargreaves is a top drawer all be it different type of replacement; I know who i'd rather have playing away from home against Roma last seaon or Milan.
Granted like Carrick, Hargreaves price was inflated but three factors came into that price:
1. We are Manchester United (prices always get raised when we come in)
2. The world cup factor
3. Bayern didn't want to sell him!
So £17m wasn't overly ridiculous for a player who probably has the best years ahead of him.
With the emergence of Anderson and the remergence of Fletcher some fans are saying our midfield doesn't need Hargreaves and we could have saved £17m and spent it on a forward instead but thats Championship manager stuff not real life football!
I think personally Hargreaves was the correct signing at the time (i think he's better than Mascherano who cost roughly the same) and Scholes like Keane won't last forever so yes Hargreaves isn't the next Roy Keane but then Roy Keane wasn't the Next Bryan Robson but we came to love him. So I say it's time we start to appreciate what we have and that is a top drawer probably top 3 in his position in the world and into the bargain he's English. So i for 1 are delighted we signed him and i think he'll be a major player for us over the next 5-6 seasons!
Right on, Brother!:D
 
Mascherano is a bit different to Hargreaves though, imo he is better defensively, both positioning and tackling, his slide tackles are usually spot on whereas Hargreaves stays on his feet and tends to foul alot. Hargreaves might have a better passing range although he hasn't shown it yet, and he is very quick and should be able to bomb forward. Again he hasn't shown much of this yet, might be still trying to settle or restricted by tactics. But since both are DM, solid no nonsense defending should be the top priority.

Mascherano is better in every department (yes that includes passing) apart from not being able to run around as fast for as long.
 
Yeah, he's been the best DM this season bar none.

He doesn't look like an Argentine footballer though, he looks like an Irish call centre manager

images%5Cpictures%5Cplayers%5CEsteban-Cambiasso.jpg
 
Too early to make any fair comparison. Mascherano was spectacularly shit in his first season in the Premier League. If we're gonna compare like with like, then Hargreaves is the better player.

Mascherano was playing out of position in his time at West Ham which was the reason why he never made any impact with them, and when he joined Liverpool he showed his class and gave a better balance to the midfield, and he played consistently well for Liverpool and still is imo.

Mascherano may not run around alot but his positional sense is what makes him the better defensive midfielder and he can pass the ball well, not saying Hargreaves is shit or anything but he needs to get his head sorted and not run like a headless chicken and use his positional sense for once so he doesn't have to give hundreds of foul near the box
 
Mascherano was playing out of position in his time at West Ham which was the reason why he never made any impact with them, and when he joined Liverpool he showed his class and gave a better balance to the midfield, and he played consistently well for Liverpool and still is imo.

Beg to differ, Liverpool's midfield has looked more un-balanced with Mascherano in the side. They looked much, much better with Alonso in the mix. Now there's a player who really can pass a ball, in stark contrast to Mascherano.
 
Not true at all.

I don't expect Hargreaves to be like Keane at all, I just expect him to be better than what he is at the moment.

Personally I would have loved to have seen Mascherano at United, but hey-ho, that's football.

I get what you mean but I would loved to have had Cech over VDS when we got him but fact is VDS became an United player and I will back him to the hilt.

But anyway I was having a go at certain people who see no reason to have players like Hargreaves or Mascherano
 
One free kick doesn't change the fact that he has been distinctly average this season.

Anyone who now jumps on the 'he's been great this season' bandwagon, just because of one goal is quite frankly stupid and very ignorant.

Good free kick mind.
 
One free kick doesn't change the fact that he has been distinctly average this season.

Anyone who now jumps on the 'he's been great this season' bandwagon, just because of one goal is quite frankly stupid and very ignorant.

Good free kick mind.

Summed up perfectly.
 
playing well today. no dwelling.

There was a stage there were it was very tight, and he played himself out of it with good passing with park and Teveth. Doing well.

Still, he's let a fair few runners go unchallenged.
 
Mascherano can feck off an' all

Another player who everyone hails as being great, despite him being average at best, as well as completely pointless, and often counter productive
 
I bet he does, I bet he just can;t wait to get to a computer to see what we think of his goal. Nice goal Owen:lol:

very nice free kick. the perfect range for him. did some headless chicken stuff today but moved the ball a bit better. maybe it's coming around for him , but he'd still not be in my first 11. what he does give the club is another choice in midf when it's in 3-4 different comps.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.