Griezmann vs Lukaku: If we could get one, who would you splash the cash on?

Who would you rather?

  • Griezmann

  • Lukaku

Results are only viewable after voting.
I honestly wouldn't want Lukaku here at any price. He lacks technical ability and has a playstyle which wouldn't sort the type of team we're trying to become.

What would be the point of finally getting rid of Fellaini only to replace him with another big lump to hoof the ball to?
 
An Irish Red said:
I honestly wouldn't want Lukaku here at any price. He lacks technical ability and has a playstyle which wouldn't sort the type of team we're trying to become.

What would be the point of finally getting rid of Fellaini only to replace him with another big lump to hoof the ball to?
Click to expand...
There is one little difference in that Lukaku has scored 27 goals and has 6 assists this season while the talentless Fellaini has 1 goal and 1 assist so I guess the "lump" Lukaku has perhaps a little bit more in his locker? One thing is for certain that despite him being a big unit he can for sure move around and has pace and power while Fellaini is just a dreadful footballer.
 
MichaelRed said:
Why is OP being laughed at for this? Griezmann doesn't even score as many goals as Lukaku does when Griez is in a stronger team in a weaker league ffs. Lukaku bags more in an average team, in a tougher league. Lukaku is settled in England, whereas Griez has already made it clear he doesn't fancy the English weather/lifestyle. Lukaku is 3 years younger too. Honestly, I'd take Lukaku over Griezmann.
Click to expand...


:lol: :lol: :lol:

La Liga vs PL is not even a contest man.

OnTopic: Depends on the team and what it needs. I am not convinced that Griezmann as a striker will fit into a possession based team.
 
I love Rashford, but I think he would do extremely well with someone like Lukaku just in front of him or even Rashford playing from the left with the big man in the middle to bang them in. Griezmann is a pipe dream, so I have voted Lukaku
 
  • Like
Reactions: Penna
johanovic said:
There is one little difference in that Lukaku has scored 27 goals and has 6 assists this season while the talentless Fellaini has 1 goal and 1 assist so I guess the "lump" Lukaku has perhaps a little bit more in his locker? One thing is for certain that despite him being a big unit he can for sure move around and has pace and power while Fellaini is just a dreadful footballer.
Click to expand...

Obviously. I was comparing their style and not their ability. Lukaku thrives when he has acres of space (which he wouldn't get here) or when it's lumped into the box (which he shouldn't get here).

We need someone who has good close control and good dribbling ability in small spaces. That isn't Lukaku.
 
An Irish Red said:
Obviously. I was comparing their style and not their ability. Lukaku thrives when he has acres of space (which he wouldn't get here) or when it's lumped into the box (which he shouldn't get here).

We need someone who has good close control and good dribbling ability in small spaces. That isn't Lukaku.
Click to expand...
Do we not perhaps need both? Sometimes you need strength and power in the box when team´s are packing their defence? Before Ibra we hardly had any physical prescene upfront but that sure did help us this season. And with perhaps Rashford as the only striker left after the summer we need at least 2 strikers.
 
johanovic said:
Do we not perhaps need both? Sometimes you need strength and power in the box when team´s are packing their defence? Before Ibra we hardly had any physical prescene upfront but that sure did help us this season. And with perhaps Rashford as the only striker left after the summer we need at least 2 strikers.
Click to expand...

I can't think of a successful team that has a striker as limited as Lukaku. He has his uses obviously but the negatives outweigh the positives with him.

I can't see us signing two strikers either. Not when we'll almost certainly play a one striker system. We'll see though.
 
An Irish Red said:
I can't think of a successful team that has a striker as limited as Lukaku. He has his uses obviously but the negatives outweigh the positives with him.

I can't see us signing two strikers either. Not when we'll almost certainly play a one striker system. We'll see though.
Click to expand...
He must be the most complete limited striker around then having scored 27 goals and 6 assists in a Everton team? Last season he scored 15 in 31 games. We need a prober right winger and with Martial/Rashford Griezman and a new right winger with some crossing ability behind Lukaku we would have a really exciting attack. Need to find a good DM also.
 
johanovic said:
He must be the most complete limited striker around then having scored 27 goals and 6 assists in a Everton team? Last season he scored 15 in 31 games. We need a prober right winger and with Martial/Rashford Griezman and a new right winger with some crossing ability behind Lukaku we would have a really exciting attack. Need to find a good DM also.
Click to expand...

Well Benteke was putting up similar numbers at Villa and I doubt you'd class him as anything other than limited.

Some types of players just can't cut it and big teams and I'd be amazed if Lukaku wasn't one of them.
 
Former Manchester United coach Rene Meulensteen has questioned whether Romelu Lukaku is a good enough striker to play for the Red Devils.

Speaking on the Alan Brazil Sports Breakfast, Sir Alex Ferguson’s former right-hand man said: “Don’t get me wrong here, Lukaku has obviously had a fantastic season and he is a goalscorer.

“But at a club like Manchester United you need more strings to your bow.

“What he needs to develop definitely is his game on the ball, in terms of quick combinations with his team-mates.

“That is where he falls short, I think, and it’s something that’s not as exposed at a club like Everton.

“But if you play at the highest level, your finesse on the ball in the final third, your decision making has to be absolutely spot on.

“Yes he would bring power, he would bring strength, but when you look over the years at the strikers United have had, does he fit in the same line of strikers? I don’t think so.”
Click to expand...
Read more at http://talksport.com/football/rene-...-and-not-good-enough-lead#FuXSqLBZvCDWSAPM.99
 
I agree with Rene. Lukaku would be nice but probably at best is Arsenal level right now and comparing him to Greizmann would be like comparing Giroud and Hazard. I defo would not say no to him though
 
An Irish Red said:
Obviously. I was comparing their style and not their ability. Lukaku thrives when he has acres of space (which he wouldn't get here) or when it's lumped into the box (which he shouldn't get here).

We need someone who has good close control and good dribbling ability in small spaces. That isn't Lukaku.
Click to expand...

In fairness, Griezmann is also not a dribbler.
 
I like the idea of BOTH Griezmann and Lukaku. Let's scare the heck out of opponents for a change.
 
I don't get it, hasn't Pogba proved to you lot yet that he's not a no.10? I don't see why he shouldn't play with Griezmann as long as there's the right defensive balance alongside Pogba. A young Carrick or a bruiser who's good at retaining possession and we'd be absolutely sorted.
 
Not convinced really by either of them if I am being honest. I think Lukaku is probably at his level right now at Everton, although Chelsea seem keen on him. Griezmann I haven't seen a lot of him, but what I have I haven't been overly impressed.
 
This team needs a goal scorer and Lakaku gurentees that. Let the other attacking players do the technical stuff and let him get on the end it!
 
SSSSnake said:
This team needs a goal scorer and Lakaku gurentees that. Let the other attacking players do the technical stuff and let him get on the end it!
Click to expand...

Nowadays you need a striker who can offer more than just finishing, I don't think he does enough outside the box to be effective as a Mourinho 9. He's still young so he could always improve, but for the money he would cost I'd rather sign a player at the top of his game like Griezmann. He always seems to go missing against big teams and blows hot and cold, although I'm not sure how much of that is down to Everton being a streaky team the last few years.
 
Griezmann. Lukaku is a very good player too and I think a lot on here are way too harsh on him but having him up front would encourage us to play a certain way that I'd rather we didn't.
 
Lukaku is being underrated a bit. He's a fantastic Prem proven striker who is more than capable of knocking in 30 or more goals a year at a top club.
 
Raoul said:
Lukaku is being underrated a bit. He's a fantastic Prem proven striker who is more than capable of knocking in 30 or more goals a year at a top club.
Click to expand...
Proper Jose type centre forward too.
 
Raoul said:
He's a fantastic Prem proven striker who is more than capable of knocking in 30 or more goals a year at a top club.
Click to expand...

True,but Griezmann is rung above Lukaku and Lukaku is rung above Rashford and Martial,ideally we should have an Griezmann level(world class),Lukaku level(proven premiership striker) and a Rashford/Martial not yet proven but
potentially premiership/world class.

It wouldn't surprise me if Jose bought two strikers this summer or he wouldn't be too upset if PSG put in a big offer for Martial and he wanted to go back France.
 
Lukaku. Now its more like i think lukaku is more needed than griezzy. We need a holding striker to stretch the game, he is strong, young, got good height, got good athleticism. Is a proven talent of epl. I think both pogba and lukaku alone will be enough.
 
It's the equivalent of tennis dilemma:
Juan Martin del Potro or David Ferrer?
 
When both are needed and you ask to choose one... Griezmann. He will make us a Champions League team.
 
Really all depends on whether Costa leaves Chelsea. I don't see Lukaku going there if Costa remains.
 
Reports saying Lukaku wants £200k and only United willing to pay that much. dear me!

Hope we don't get stuck with this lump for the next 10yrs when we can sign better players. He might make us a top 4 side at best.
 
Z_Wolf said:
Reports saying Lukaku wants £200k and only United willing to pay that much. dear me!

Hope we don't get stuck with this lump for the next 10yrs when we can sign better players. He might make us a top 4 side at best.
Click to expand...

Imagine how many goals he would have got with us this year, with the games like burnley, stoke etc at home. I bet my bottom dollar he would have had a field day
 
Not convinced by either, Griezmann is playing in a league where the competition is not as strong as the PL he has not been that impressive against Barca and Real. He may struggle over a long season here, Lukaku is used to the premier league and if played for a better team may be very effective. The prices quoted for either of these is too much.
 
Emmet said:
Imagine how many goals he would have got with us this year, with the games like burnley, stoke etc at home. I bet my bottom dollar he would have had a field day
Click to expand...
I doubt it. He will struggle against teams parking the double decker. But he will struggle in CL more because he's simply not good enough to have an impact in CL.

But most importantly, I don't want to see hoofball next season. For £100m, we can buy virtually any player in the world.
 
Last edited:
Z_Wolf said:
I doubt it. He will struggle against teams parking the double decker. But he will struggle in CL more because he's simply not good enough to have an impact in CL.

But most importantly, I don't want to see hoofball next season. For £100m, we can buy virtually any player in the world.
Click to expand...
One of Lukaku's best attributes imo is backing into defenders and spinning off them, getting shots on goal away. Playing V those teams that sit deep is perfect. Plus hes pretty dam good in the air :)
 
manichester said:
Not convinced by either, Griezmann is playing in a league where the competition is not as strong as the PL he has not been that impressive against Barca and Real. He may struggle over a long season here, Lukaku is used to the premier league and if played for a better team may be very effective. The prices quoted for either of these is too much.
Click to expand...

I agree on not being truly sold on either. You say he wasn't impressive against Real or Barca, but it was the leicester games that worried me more. He couldn't break down a stubborn defence which has been our problem all season against weaker teams. Atletico typically play a counter attacking style and that's great but our problem is breaking down teams with 2 banks of 4 in front of us esp at OT. I'm not saying no to him just being skeptical for the time being. Lukaku will score in the pl, against big teams in CL is where I would be skeptical on him
 
My choice would be Lukaku. His goal scoring has gotten better and better in the premier league. He competes with guys playing for top four sides whilst at Everton for the golden boot. It would be better to get both but they would cost close to 150m that would eat into our transfer budget

My preferred choices would be Sanchez and
Belotti. It's a shame Arsenal wouldn't dare sell one of their stars to us again. We would get them for less than a hundred million maybe 70. Sanchez can score goals from the wings and Belotti as a nine and we wouldn't have to tweak the formation to fit both in.
 
Lukaku.

A pure 9 is more important if you play 4-3-3 or even 4-2-3-1 and Griezman is a SS imo.

But i prefer to sign a destroyer-midfielder, a top LB and play with Martial-Rashford up front.
 
bosnian_red said:
As good as griezmann is, and obviously he's on a different level to Lukaku... I think I would prefer Lukaku (lets say him at 50m vs Griezmann at 100m). Griezmann just doesn't really fit our team and honestly, have my doubts over how great he would be in the prem. We don't play with 2 up top, and our group of midfielders necessitate a midfield 3 to get the best out of both Pogba and Herrera. Griezmann doesn't fit a front 3 and you basically can't get the best out of both Pogba, and Griezmann. It's one with the other being stifled and playing out of position. Lukaku is perfect as a lone striker, especially in the prem. Get quality wide players either side of him (hell, hope Martial and Miki get consistent next season and we are set on that front).

Basically, Lukaku slots right in and makes us more balanced and is an obvious fit. Griezmann we have to shuffle people around and probably won't get the best out of him with the current group of players. It's not all about "who is a better player". Griezmann is world class but just doesn't really fit in, unless we are doing big changes.
Click to expand...
Agreed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.