Graham Potter | turns down Ajax job

Would be a smart move for Palace. He's shown he can overachieve at a medium sized club with a limited budget. Might even make Palace an exciting team to watch for the first time in recent memory.

Palace aren't a bad side to watch now. Plenty of flair in their team.
 
Palace aren't a bad side to watch now. Plenty of flair in their team.
Under Vieira they ceded possession in most games and could barely muster a shot on target in his final weeks in charge. I've never enjoyed watching a Roy Hodgson team either. No doubt they have some skilful attacking players in Eze, Olise and Zaha, which is why I think they have the potential to be an exciting watch under a progressive manager.
 
I think Potter will do well at Palace, Ajax or wherever and probably surprise a lot of people...
 
Would be good for Crystal Palace. but there also seems to be talk of Nice going for him.
 
It barely even seems like a rivalry.

That’s like saying Man Utd Liverpool hardly feels like a rivalry

I think Potter will do well at Palace, Ajax or wherever and probably surprise a lot of people...

No surprise for me, I think he’s an excellent manager, Chelsea/Boelhy made his life very difficult and were silly to sack him.

He’ll do well wherever he goes, I just hope it’s not Palace, that feels very wrong.
 
I hope that he puts in a release clause for England.

Southgate will (hopefully) leave after eng fail at the Euro's.
 
Would be a coup for Palace if they can convince him to join, especially because of the ‘rivalry’ between Brighton and Palace.

Both sets of fans seem to love Glen Murray who played for both teams though, so whatever.

Although I think the Brighton fans were not happy with the way he left the club, so perhaps he already burnt his bridges anyway.
 
The thing about Glen Murray is both brighton and palace were stupid to let him go. So he was always a coup rather than a reject.

Potter, unlike that waste of carbon Mullery, has never been rude about Palace.

Im ambivalent about Potter as a manager.
His Brighton's flaw was finishing, and that’s the current Palace weakness as well.

His Brightonosity would be a multiplier for the fans. It’d make victories sweeter and defeats bitterer.
 
Potter isn't that special, Brighton is just an extremely well-run club all around.
 
Chelsea was a terrible choice with the new ownership and the way they went with Tuchel sacking and signings.

But then it was Chelsea afterall and its difficult to turn such a top club. He will do well with Palace if they can manage to get him.
 
Would be a smart move for Palace. He's shown he can overachieve at a medium sized club with a limited budget. Might even make Palace an exciting team to watch for the first time in recent memory.

I'm actually not sure he has. Did he really overachieve when the manager that came in after him has done better?
 
Good move for them. He's a lot better than his Chelsea stint and they have some half decent talent there for him to work with. He could get them playing some good football and it's good to join now and have a full summer to bed in.
 
You could argue that he laid the ground work for what was to come

You could also argue that foundation was set by Chris Houghton.......

Houghton got them promoted and then finished 15th / 17th. Potter then finished 15th / 16th / 9th.

I like Potter, seems a good guy but the jury is still out. It would not surprise me in the slightest if he failed at Palace (Also wouldn't be amazed if he did a decent job).
 
I'm actually not sure he has. Did he really overachieve when the manager that came in after him has done better?

Yes. He finished 9th with them, taking them away from the perennial relegation battles they had previously and started the season very well before De Zerbi took over. A lot of what De Zerbi has done has been built on the Potter and Brighton foundation. It's been tweaked and made better but that doesn't take away from the excellent work Potter did.
 
I hope successful Brighton managers joining Chelsea doesn't become a Thing that People Expect to Happen. Smaller clubs should be allowed to develop and progress without fear of having their staff lured away to prop up underperforming giants. I say 'Brighton/Chelsea' but this applies across the board. Surely the disastrous Super League plans have told us that there are far too many entitled Big Clubs out there and that this needs to stop.

It won't, and there's no way of making it. Just like young players who show they're great at a smaller club will always move to a bigger one if they get the chance, the same will always hold for managers.
 
You could also argue that foundation was set by Chris Houghton.......

Houghton got them promoted and then finished 15th / 17th. Potter then finished 15th / 16th / 9th.

I like Potter, seems a good guy but the jury is still out. It would not surprise me in the slightest if he failed at Palace (Also wouldn't be amazed if he did a decent job).

Houghton's playing style was proper Burnley/Stoke one, Potter changed the way they played completely and the next manager built on what Potter built there (ofcourse along with Brighton's staff)
 
I'm actually not sure he has. Did he really overachieve when the manager that came in after him has done better?

Come on. Since Potter took over Brighton has steadily moved up, from being a perennial relegation candidate playing simple, pragmatic survival football to being safely entrenched in the upper lower half to qualifying for the EL, while playing football enjoyed and admired by all, and despite regularly selling off their best players. Which speaks well of the whole organisation, but there's no question Potter did a very impressive job.
 
You could also argue that foundation was set by Chris Houghton.......

Houghton got them promoted and then finished 15th / 17th. Potter then finished 15th / 16th / 9th.

I like Potter, seems a good guy but the jury is still out. It would not surprise me in the slightest if he failed at Palace (Also wouldn't be amazed if he did a decent job).

No you couldn't.

Houghton was great, he played very organised low block defensive football and kept us in the premier league for 2 seasons, but with that style of play we would never have got any higher and every season would have been about beating relegation.

Potter came in and changed that entirely, he changed us to an expansive and progressive style of football, it takes a bit of time (something Chelsea not to give) for that change to really take hold and he guided us to our highest ever position since we were founded in 1901. His work with Bloom, Ashworth and Barber changed the style of player we signed and developed and completely changed the way we played.

De Zerbi has come in and picked up where Potter left off, we were fourth when Potter left having just put 5 past Leicester, De Zerbi is brilliant and I'm over the moon he is our manager, but Potter was very very good as well and De Zerbi said that it was Potter that laid the groundwork for him to come in and tweak when he took over and thanked him again at the end of the season.

As much as I liked Houghton, the football we play today and the team we have is a million miles from his vision, but still intricately linked to Potters.
 
No you couldn't.

Houghton was great, he played very organised low block defensive football and kept us in the premier league for 2 seasons, but with that style of play we would never have got any higher and every season would have been about beating relegation.

Potter came in and changed that entirely, he changed us to an expansive and progressive style of football, it takes a bit of time (something Chelsea not to give) for that change to really take hold and he guided us to our highest ever position since we were founded in 1901. His work with Bloom, Ashworth and Barber changed the style of player we signed and developed and completely changed the way we played.

De Zerbi has come in and picked up where Potter left off, we were fourth when Potter left having just put 5 past Leicester, De Zerbi is brilliant and I'm over the moon he is our manager, but Potter was very very good as well and De Zerbi said that it was Potter that laid the groundwork for him to come in and tweak when he took over and thanked him again at the end of the season.

As much as I liked Houghton, the football we play today and the team we have is a million miles from his vision, but still intricately linked to Potters.

As you're a Brighton fan, I can't really argue.

I wouldn't be surprised if Potter struggled a bit at another club that isn't as well run as Brighton...... Like he already has at Chelsea.

I do hope I'm wrong though, as he seems one of the good guys in football.
 
I do hope I'm wrong though, as he seems one of the good guys in football.
Without a doubt, even though he left us in the lurch and took large portion of our coaching staff with him, I have a lot of time for Potter. But I would be gutted if he took the Palace job.
 
Potter is still one of those top of my manager lists. The work he did at Brighton is what we need at the club now too. Someone that can hone into the modern style of football and lay some foundations and stabilise us.
 
He's way above the Championship. It'd be a bit of a coup for Palace, let alone Leeds.
I just think that Leeds have more potential than Palace do even though their current positions don’t tell that story. It’s not that long ago that Leeds were in the CL
 
Without a doubt, even though he left us in the lurch and took large portion of our coaching staff with him, I have a lot of time for Potter. But I would be gutted if he took the Palace job.
I'm guessing that's why your fans booed him on his return to the amex a few months ago. But because of that, I doubt he's going to have any loyalty towards Brighton when weighing up the Palace job.