- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 37,366
They won the league 3 times in a row after he was appointed. How were they shit?
They won the league 3 times in a row after he was appointed. How were they shit?
What about Pep, Zidane, Conte? They all fluked it? Just woke up one day good, nothing to do with the environment around them or the platform they were given to succeed?
So imagine Juventus finished 7th this year because they had a manager meltdown, and then next season went on to win the league because they had the best players in the league?
You're just projecting things you think now. Getting insane
Man, who hurt you? Why are you projecting so much? There's many ways to make it as a manager, doesn't always have to be the Spurs route does it but you seem to only operate in binary for some reason.They fluked it because they didn't manage Spurs before taking over big clubs. They shouldn't have taken the job because they didn't prove they can do it by working for Spurs in some capacity before taking big job.
So imagine Juventus finished 7th this year because they had a manager meltdown, and then next season went on to win the league because they had the best players in the league?
Man, who hurt you? Why are you projecting so much? There's many ways to make it as a manager, doesn't always have to be the Spurs route does it but you seem to only operate in binary for some reason.
Between 2011 and 2020 they won 9 league titles. Nah you're right, same situation as Potter, I get it now.Don't comment on things you have no clue about. Go and check what happened in later half of the decade and what position they were in.
Between 2011 and 2020 they won 9 league titles. Nah you're right, same situation as Potter, I get it now.
0 help.
You're arguing that Conte did what Potter did and was successful without getting intermediary experience first. I'm simply saying that the two aren't comparable, apples to oranges due to the league.Wtf are you even talking about
Go and check which positions Juventus finished in before Conte took over, not just one season. Check 2-3 seasons. Why the feck are you talking about 2011-2020.
Seriously do you even know what you are arguing about?
Ole at United, Lampard at Chelsea...etc etc.
You are saying that if Conte had a twin with his exact same genetic makeup, who never played professionally due to a serious injury, but who got into management at around the same time, that twin would have managed Juventus just as well as Antonio if given the chance.
Well I disagree.
You're arguing that Conte did what Potter did and was successful without getting intermediary experience first. I'm simply saying that the two aren't comparable, apples to oranges due to the league.
It may be necessary, but it is definitely not sufficient.
The same way plenty of managers are able to acquire knowledge without having a great playing career.Conte acquired his game knowledge based on his playing style/position and working under few greats. So if he never played why will he have same knowledge.
The same way plenty of managers are able to acquire knowledge without having a great playing career.
So?
Maybe Conte replica without Football career would have been a Mafia Don, who knows or cares.
I'm not sure why you find the idea of institutional knowledge so controversial.
If I was randomly made the boss at my current job, I don't know that I would do well, but I would certainly do better than if I was randomly made the boss at an equivalent institution where I've never set foot in my life.
I'm not sure why you find the idea of institutional knowledge so controversial.
If I was randomly made the boss at my current job, I don't know that I would do well, but I would certainly do better than if I was randomly made the boss at an equivalent institution where I've never set foot in my life.
Pirlo at Juve, Solari at Madrid and the list is huge.
Somehow there are few who thinks knowing club makes them qualified for the job.
I fully agree with this, the last pages here have become really weird.It seems that people still struggle with this simple idea. Managers aren't necessarily able to manage in all type of circumstances
I don't really think so. Potter has proven that he can work well in stable environments. He couldn't do it under a board that created a huge mess instead of building a sensible squad, but any board that thinks that they are working less chaotic than Boely will probably still value him quite similar to how they did while he was at Brighton.It’s going to take a Moyes amount of time to rehabilitate his career and reputation.
Worked for Neville?If the rumoured pay out amount is true I'd never work again. Just go do pundit work or something.
I fully agree with this, the last pages here have become really weird.
I don't really think so. Potter has proven that he can work well in stable environments. He couldn't do it under a board that created a huge mess instead of building a sensible squad, but any board that thinks that they are working less chaotic than Boely will probably still value him quite similar to how they did while he was at Brighton.
50m? its not. his agreed payoff is unrelated to his contractIf the rumoured pay out amount is true I'd never work again. Just go do pundit work or something.
If the rumoured pay out amount is true I'd never work again. Just go do pundit work or something.
What's the rumoured pay out? All I've seen is that he's not getting his contract paid.
Worked for Neville?
50m? its not. his agreed payoff is unrelated to his contract
What's the rumoured pay out? All I've seen is that he's not getting his contract paid.
He has all the 'upsides' of Southgate (with the exception of the England playing career, which is kind of double edged anyway, since it more or less equates to 'respectable failure') in terms of 'EQ', working within the system etc - but he's also better both as a coach and tactically (notwithstanding the efforts of a bloated, incoherent and apparently -if reports are to be believed - inordinately entitled Chelsea squad). I think we win the EC final Italy game, just about, and Potter also puts on Rashford earlier than Southgate did against France, which maybe at that point tilts it back into extra time and a coin toss. He would have also tried to deal with Griezmann's influence a bit more proactively...Just out of curiosity, a question for the Englishmen on the forum. As things stand, with his reputation taking a hit after his first shot at the highest level and with rumours coming from the Chelsea dressing room that players were baffled by his decisions more often than not, would you take him as England manager?
No I'm saying he took this job to get the experience of managing a club with such expectations which was the right thing to do as opposed to saying no to the offer because he didnt have prior experience of managing a club of such expectations, which is what I quoted from your previous post.Are you suggesting Potter should have been given time to learn how to manage the former Champions League holders because that's the only way he could?