HookedOnAPhelan
Full Member
Senile old fart.
I find Jordan fascinating and most of the times agree with his comments. He talks a lot of sense. I love the fact he went in on Souness for his BS he constantly comes out with. He didn’t hold back either.
Indeed indeed. He upsets the dynamics of typical football punditry by using a simple system of making clear statements and supporting them with rational supporting points. Almost like reading a well-written essay. It’s quite the stark divergence from the “talking points + narrative” approach and seems to short circuit the synapses of people like Souness.
This has got to be parody? He’s the Jordan Peterson of Football talking heads.
It is little bit hard to listen to someone who's football club went into administration and while he was chairman of that club, he pretty much hired and fired manager like it was a computer game.It’s not a parody, no. Probably more like a different opinion to yours.
I think the complete opposite. Pure hypocrisy from Souness.Are you all watching a different video? Jordan is a ghoul and Souness is right.
Jordan acts like a child to make a radio show pop off. Utter prick.
It is little bit hard to listen to someone who's football club went into administration and while he was chairman of that club, he pretty much hired and fired manager like it was a computer game.
Sure, he can say some clever things but he is no place to criticise Souness.
Why is Souness wrong? He says it is a risk taking a manager that "don't" know english football. He is not wrong. Every time you sign manager it is risk although it is kind of pointless saying that at first place.Why not? If somebody is wrong or being unreasonable and reasons can be given to show why that is the case, then why shouldn’t they be called out on it? The discussion was not about owning or running a football club, so I’m not sure what your argument is.
Simon Jordan DESTROYS Graham Souness with FACTS and LOGIC
Why is Souness wrong? He says it is a risk taking a manager that "don't" know english football. He is not wrong. Every time you sign manager it is risk although it is kind of pointless saying that at first place.
Because Simon thought he was good enough to "teach" Souness something about football but when he was in charge of his own football club, we know how it went.
Are you all watching a different video? Jordan is a ghoul and Souness is right.
Jordan acts like a child to make a radio show pop off. Utter prick.
You want to see it that way. I don't. I don't think it has anything to do with where people come from.It would be hard and probably disingenuous for anyone to watch the original clip from Souness and think that his main point was that every managerial appointment carries risk, when it was clearly the same sort of “foreigners don’t understand our game” guff that has been trotted out for 30 years. He also got caught in a spot of hypocrisy for his “five jobs in five years” soundbyte but then suddenly wanted to go into context when Jordan brought up his own managerial job turbulence. Referring to Jordan’s failed ownership of Palace actually has no relevance to the discussion since the discussion was not about football ownership and in fact it requires zero qualifications to make a reawakened riposte against Souness’s lazy argument.
This is the most appropriate response in this threadJordan and Souness are both complete and utter wankers.
Most likely though I’ve just landed in a talkshite snare!
You want to see it that way. I don't. I don't think it has anything to do with where people come from.
Jordan presented his case like it was true while "forgetting" couple of years. Why not being honest? Why not saying, five clubs in nine years? Because it doesn't suit his narrative. He somehow skipped part about first years in Liverpool and last years in Benfica. So wrong on many levels.
And yes, I do think that it has relevance. As I said, he is trying to teach former manager/great player something. But when he got chance to put his mark on football, we have fact how it went. So he is in no position to lecture Souness something that Souness is right about. And that is risk about appointing managers. Although as I said, it is pretty pointless because there are never any guarantees.
Pretty much.Simon Jordan is a cnut and often wrong but his smarmy git style fools people into thinking he wasn’t wrong because he added little clauses to what he said to get him out of jail for his opinions.
9 minutes I'll never get back
What Jordan was doing was cherry picking from sourness’s managerial career to highlight Souness doing the very same thing.
De Zerbi spent 3 years at Sassuolo and then moved to Shaktar before the war broke out. The fact he moved around a lot in his early career also doesn’t mean much as it’s pretty common for Italian managers to do this.
it’s lazy and needless for souness to wade in so early and he deserved pulling up on it.
Most likely though I’ve just landed in a talkshite snare!
Isn’t that Souness’s job to establish that before criticising De Zerbi for constantly changing jobs?If I start a job in 2010, a new one in 2020 and another in 2022, it’s fraudulent to suggest I’ve had 3 jobs in 3 years. But it’s also factually correct.
Jordan is an absolute thunderCnut.
Had he pointed out to Souness that De Zerbi spent 3 years at one club and moved to a better one, that ended early due to global politics… that’s a football chat.
Reframing a single period of Souness’ career is just pathetic and the fella does it all the time. He’s not bright. He’s well spoken. Exact same formula that bewitches people in the country all the damn time.
Isn’t that Souness’s job to establish that before criticising De Zerbi for constantly changing jobs?