Remember the geese
Full Member
Boringly typical.Goalposts clearly had to be moved!
Boringly typical.Goalposts clearly had to be moved!
I doubt that very much. Amorim likes wingers/wingbacks who can dove tail with each other if employed together. Quenda would pretty much be Amad 2.0. Able to be adept at RWB and R10.If this is legit, then it must mean that either Amorim sees Amad more as an inside forward or Dalot is being sold. We don't need 4 players for RWB.
I haven't made up the fee...it has been reported in the media regardless of the credibility and it would probably be less than what we actually would pay given it would be built up over now to the summer.Firstly one of the most reputable journalists (Ornstein) has said the fee is likely €40m which equates to £33m. So sort your figure out or maybe get a job at a tabloid.
Secondly he’ll be 18 by that time. He’s also rated by Sporting fans as their best prospect since Ronaldo. He’s not only played well in the Portuguese league but he’s excelled in Europe too. Are you also dismissive of all talent from that league? Ruben Dias? Bruno? Ugarte? Joao Neves? The league means nothing. The Dutch league gets shit for its quality but players like Luis Suarez, Gakpo, etc.. have come from there and succeeded. There’s no correlation.
So you’re quoting a made up fee, getting his position wrong, harshly judging a player based on your perceptions of the league and equating it to ETH buying former players, which basically is irrelevant. Not only that but you also forget the successes like Martinez.
It’s fine to have reservations but they need to be based on something tangible, not just things you’ve made up in your head. Maybe if you’d watched him play and offered doubts about aspects of his play-style or footballing intelligence you might get taken seriously.
I think, thats making it look a little clearer than it actually is. I mean, every transfer can turn out a flop. We all know that. I agree with you, that alone shouldn't stop us from attempting transfers. But we also should be smart about it - there aren't too many transfers in our recent history, that had warning signs all over them right from the start, they all made some sense, they all had potential and so on. Of course, without the slightest chance of a transfer coming good nobody would try it - but we have a history of promising players failing for us so we simply have to be extra sure not to get blinded by sheer optimism. Everything you said about the player is true, and with Prices until 35 million mark, it is a different proposition, but given that we have limited resources, everything more than that we have to do our homework. With 18 the player hasn't even finished his body transformation yet. He is by definition inexperienced and raw. A big price tag will add additional pressure. Same as playing in a, status quo, rather dysfunctional team in a high pressure environment. He would also be changing countries with all challenges that come with it. So lets not act as if this would be some sort of no-brainer. We have quite a few young and promising players in our team, I think, you could make a good claim to focus on players that will help us from the start and aren't expected to take extra time to bed in. Buying promising 17 year olds is the right thing to do, no doubt about that - but we don't have to let ourselves get dragged into chasing the "best 17 year olds at the minute" when it means that we have to pay big amounts for players who aren't expected to contribute to that level yet. Young players need playing time to come good, are we a good enough team to afford them that time to develop without endangering results on the pitch? I'd say no.Yeah but one player flopped in completely different circumstances so how can we ever sign a player again
I haven't followed the whole debate but I can see your points. I kind of like that people keep their optimism and enthusiasm for promising players intact and good for them. But over the years we have been burned a few times. Hojlund was also one of the best striker talents in Europe, Sancho was meant to "take over RW for the next 10 years". It is the right thing to buy promising potential - we just have to make sure, we strike the right balance between potential and price. Because price is, what is now making transfers of Hojlund and Sancho look bad.How can I be called negative and cynical for being sceptical about splashing out 50mil on a 17yo from a league that is not one of the strongest in Europe?
Please explain that to me?
The irony of this.watch the games mate.
No worries mate,Congratulations for losing the argument and responding in a clichéd manner.
Nicely putFor what it’s worth, I agree with your sentiment, but watch how a wordsmith like myself can make it sound.
Objectively speaking, I’m not wholly convinced that the smartest use of our apparently tight budget is to spend big on an up and coming talent, who plays in a league which has a history of receiving big transfer fees for young players, who then go on to vastly underachieve. Of course, I can observe his talent, and he’s clearly coveted, but I would be much more comfortable if £50m was the total amount but perhaps close to 50% of that is related to performance based achievements.
Anthony did not convince me one bit and his signing was baffling, you could clearly see he lacked pace and physicality. Donny VDB also. ETH bought these players and stopped playing them.As a club I would do extensive scouting before spending 50mil on a 17yo in not one of the strongest leagues in the world and the main link to us is our new coach used to coach him.
Do you know that our best ever coach never had to raid his previous team whom where brilliant in their own right to eventually find success in England.
That's probably your issue. You should watch games in full.No worries mate,
I often check out YouTube as well.
In all human endeavors there are just some people who «have it». Actors, business people, musicians, artists, athletes.That's what I'm most excited about. Although I'm portuguese and a Sporting fan (with a soft spot for United due to the interclub connection and mostly Nani), my favorite player at United is Amad (I actually check if he scored before Bruno). Having those two form a partnership for years really is mouth watering.
We paid 18mil for Amad and Lenny was bought before Ruben came.Anthony did not convince me one bit and his signing was baffling, you could clearly see he lacked pace and physicality. Donny VDB also. ETH bought these players and stopped playing them.
Ruben is buying young players who meet his profile and Quenda also understands his system. He will mold them further. Ruben said when he joined, they will look at everything about a player in the recruitment aspect, including mentality.
Biggest difference between this manager and ETH is everything fans see and even complain about he addresses. He clocks players very quickly and everything he says makes sense.
ETH just waffles about a fabled process and his post match assessment was a solar system away from what fans saw. If Ruben is buying a player he already worked with, it is good, many managers who change a system use players who already know the system and build form there.
The price wasn't 50m it's less than that, Ornstien mentioned €40m so it is around £33m, name any wingback who is more established we can buy for that price who is proven?
When we over pay fans complain and now we are doing good deals, we still complain. For reference Diallo was even more unknown before we paid a similar amount.
What do you suggest...phone or Ipad?That's probably your issue. You should watch games in full.
Just gonna bold these bits for no reason whatsoever.I haven't made up the fee...it has been reported in the media regardless of the credibility and it would probably be less than what we actually would pay given it would be built up over now to the summer.
He has played LWB as I am sure any predominately left footed player could.
Martinez a success?....watch the games mate.
Do you understand the meaning of step up in intensity and functioning at the same level?
Watching him play in a weaker league and standing out is impressive but that is all it is.
I think ETH did a lot of things right in his treatment of players. He handled both Ronaldo and Sancho very well, one could maybe argue that he was too soft overall and didn’t have the charisma to get the players buy-in.Biggest difference between this manager and ETH is everything fans see and even complain about he addresses. He clocks players very quickly and everything he says makes sense.
ETH just waffles about a fabled process and his post match assessment was a solar system away from what fans saw. If Ruben is buying a player he already worked with, it is good, many managers who change a system use players who already know the system and build form there.
To be fair. Quenda would be one of the right players to sign for that role. IMO him or Frimpong of Lever should be targetsWe must have a different definition. I can't think of any that we have that I would want to trust leading the younger players coming through.
Fair enough, but I would rather prioritised acquiring the right players for those positions ahead of going for more youngsters.
Incorrect:We paid 18mil for Amad and Lenny was bought before Ruben came.
I will ask you this question first and I am sure all the other posters will chip in afterwards?
If the young man in question has a decent remainder of the season with Sporting and given the history of transfer fees regarding players leaving Portuguese clubs and we are in the bidding...what price will we be quoted for him in the summer?
I already know but I will find the replies amusing to say the least.
Just to add your assessment, where he also messed up was with going hard on Sancho but letting Rashford get away with things. When you don't treat players equally for similar things, it is downhill from there. That's why I like Ruben, dropped Garnacho and Rashford, one player changed and is back in the team and one is sulking and out of the team struggling to find a loan. How bad can it get when Anthony bags a loan weeks ago and you don't.I think ETH did a lot of things right in his treatment of players. He handled both Ronaldo and Sancho very well, one could maybe argue that he was too soft overall and didn’t have the charisma to get the players buy-in.
Big problem with him was he just couldn’t make the tactics work, like at all. No semblance of control. I think he needed to get the players to have that passion and willingness to die for each other in the press and recovery runs to make his system work and no one ever bought it. We played well when we were more conservative and tighter in midfield against stronger teams, but it just wasn’t sustainable without die-for-the-badge running machines all over the pitch. Can’t achieve that with the likes of Rashford, Ronaldo and Sancho on the team.
All systems require buy-in from the players, but ETHs more than most. When it became clear he wouldn’t get that it all fell apart. We shouldn’t have persisted with him as long as we did. But he’s going to get very good results again elsewhere at some point, I feel confident about that.
And you don't think, that might have been also connected by those players simply not getting used to the league or anything?Anthony did not convince me one bit and his signing was baffling, you could clearly see he lacked pace and physicality. Donny VDB also. ETH bought these players and stopped playing them.
Same here. Sounds good as a marketing trick but the proposition is exactly the same one as with ETH back when it happened. With him we were also expecting a system to emerge. And that the player he went for would be key pieces for this exact system. It is also funny that you expect Ruben to go for a like for like imitation of his Sporting system when most managers when asked will tell you that adaptability is the key ingredient to being successful.Ruben is buying young players who meet his profile and Quenda also understands his system. He will mold them further. Ruben said when he joined, they will look at everything about a player in the recruitment aspect, including mentality.
I'd say biggest difference right now is you applying the comfort of hindsight towards ETH and being hopeful and optimistic towards Ruben. There was a time people were hopeful and optimistic towards ETH as well. Still led to bad decisions.Biggest difference between this manager and ETH is everything fans see and even complain about he addresses. He clocks players very quickly and everything he says makes sense.
Thats funny to be honest. Once again, hindsight at full force.ETH just waffles about a fabled process and his post match assessment was a solar system away from what fans saw. If Ruben is buying a player he already worked with, it is good, many managers who change a system use players who already know the system and build form there.
The price is one of the corner stones of this transfer in terms of risk assessment. Nobody don't want the club to bring in talented young player with great potential. But the reality is that not all young players will realize that potential and given that we have limited ressources AND a squad that isn't great we can't just think that the same rules apply to us and maybe Bayern or Real. In our situation it might make more sense to bring in two 25 million players who will give you reliable 6.0-6.5/10 performances in key roles than one great talent who might be able to give you 8.0/10s here and there but only further down the line.The price wasn't £50m as the unreliable Abola reported, it's less than that, Ornstien who is Tier 1 said €40m so it is around £33m, name any wingback who is more established we can buy for that price who is proven?
When we over pay fans complain and now we are doing good deals, we still complain. For reference Diallo was even more unknown before we paid a similar amount.
You haven't watched him play. Until then your opinion doesn't really accout. For much, especially given you didn't even know his position or the price quoted.I am sure if you look at his bio it will tell you he can play on the left as well as the right which should not be too hard to believe for a left footed footballer.
Antony was decent at Ajax and good in Europe and Sancho trumped him on both accounts but both playing on the flanks in England where ineffective so why is it inconceivable that a 17yo from a weaker league should struggle as well?
As I have stated to you...why do posters cream their pants over players that do well for their existing clubs but have nothing for us?
It took some a season and a half to realise we were royally bent over when it came to Casemiro while others were on the case straight away.
We are at peace. It's an end of a cycle and if we win two leagues in a row it's unfair to keep players shackled when they reached full potencial at our club and league. We respect and appreciate what Gyökeres, Diomande and Hjulmand for example have done for our club, so understand if they move to a top league like the PL.In all human endeavors there are just some people who «have it». Actors, business people, musicians, artists, athletes.
Whatever it is, both these guys have it. Would love Quenda at Utd.! Always a shame to see great teams (like what Sporting have now) be disassembled though, hope that’s not what’s going to happen.
What’s the feeling among Sporting fans at the moment with Amorim leaving and bunch of rumours about their top players?
The same doesn't apply, as ETH was bought in to play the Ajax way and he abandoned that after a few games. Papered over the cracks for the first year and then when he tried to change things went downhill quick and had spent circa 600m.And you don't think, that might have been also connected by those players simply not getting used to the league or anything?
Same here. Sounds good as a marketing trick but the proposition is exactly the same one as with ETH back when it happened. With him we were also expecting a system to emerge. And that the player he went for would be key pieces for this exact system. It is also funny that you expect Ruben to go for a like for like imitation of his Sporting system when most managers when asked will tell you that adaptability is the key ingredient to being successful.
It is all good and well and obviously Ruben should be backed to bring in players that fit the system but stuff has to remain reasonable. Had we brought in Antony for 25-35 he wouldn't be looked at with so much anger right now.
I'd say biggest difference right now is you applying the comfort of hindsight towards ETH and being hopeful and optimistic towards Ruben. There was a time people were hopeful and optimistic towards ETH as well. Still led to bad decisions.
Thats funny to be honest. Once again, hindsight at full force.
The price is one of the corner stones of this transfer in terms of risk assessment. Nobody don't want the club to bring in talented young player with great potential. But the reality is that not all young players will realize that potential and given that we have limited ressources AND a squad that isn't great we can't just think that the same rules apply to us and maybe Bayern or Real. In our situation it might make more sense to bring in two 25 million players who will give you reliable 6.0-6.5/10 performances in key roles than one great talent who might be able to give you 8.0/10s here and there but only further down the line.
@Sly @Sporting CP Fan Do you believe the reports are true? And how highly do you rate Quenda’s talent? He looks quite special.
This level of 1 dimensional thinking always takes me by surprised.I think to avoid the mistakes if the last Amorim should be made work with hojlund and shouldn't be allowed sign players from his former club.
Why do we suddenly think hojlund is hopeless?
What are we trying to chase in the short term? The manager has the team playing very very poorly so far. He has so much to prove before we ditch our current 70m strikers and sign players 'he knows'.
Thing is with United is we have to get back to 'If you good enough, you are old enough'. Instead of sticking with somebody who is not delivering because he is older so must be better.I believe that the deal hasn't been done yet. It's just exploratory talks. I also believe that this must be an express wish of Amorim since he knows him well in terms of ability and potential. I maintain that I think this will be the only player Amorim will get from Sporting (sry no Gyökeres gents). Only my opinion and speculation of course.
Regarding Quenda I wrote this in another thread:
"What I like in Quenda is his physical traits, technical ability, tactical awareness and football intelligence , passing (look at some of his assists, specially his assist for Gyokeres goal against Citeh in the CL) and versatility since he can play multiple positions. Coaches like his humility and personality. His work rate and ethics is Ronaldo like. He gave up two weeks in his vacation so he would be ready for this season. He's obsessed with football and being a top football player. Although he earns very well now, he still lives at our academy with the youth ranks from our academy.
He can play as right wing back and RW or LW. He's very quick and can maintain ball control dribbling at speed. He can play in tight spaces, looking for quick passes and one twos so the team can break defensive lines. His movement is very intelligent, very direct with confidence.
What he has to work in? He has to work on his decision making and finishing but that's expected in 17 year old. In the final third he needs to improve his decisions and final pass. He needs to mix it up in his dribbling as well. He is always trying to cut inside to use his stronger left foot. Although he can shoot and cross with his right foot, it can make him predictable.
Defensively he needs to improve as well. He needs to be more incisive, following his player because Amorim likes high pressure without the ball. He's getting good advices and help from Inácio, Hjulmand and Daniel Bragança, so he's gradually getting better.
Obviously with 17 years of age, he's still work in progress. But I'm almost certain he will be a top player. His ability and mentality will drive him to a successful career. We have produced alot of exciting players in our academy, Ronaldo, Figo, Rafael Leão and many others and he's up there with the very best. Even those weren't as impressive as Quenda at 17 years of age career wise and in terms of accomplishments."
Like the sound of him, prioritising his career. Imagine shaw or Rashford giving up their holidaysI believe that the deal hasn't been done yet. It's just exploratory talks. I also believe that this must be an express wish of Amorim since he knows him well in terms of ability and potential. I maintain that I think this will be the only player Amorim will get from Sporting (sry no Gyökeres gents). Only my opinion and speculation of course.
Regarding Quenda I wrote this in another thread:
"What I like in Quenda is his physical traits, technical ability, tactical awareness and football intelligence , passing (look at some of his assists, specially his assist for Gyokeres goal against Citeh in the CL) and versatility since he can play multiple positions. Coaches like his humility and personality. His work rate and ethics is Ronaldo like. He gave up two weeks in his vacation so he would be ready for this season. He's obsessed with football and being a top football player. Although he earns very well now, he still lives at our academy with the youth ranks from our academy.
He can play as right wing back and RW or LW. He's very quick and can maintain ball control dribbling at speed. He can play in tight spaces, looking for quick passes and one twos so the team can break defensive lines. His movement is very intelligent, very direct with confidence.
What he has to work in? He has to work on his decision making and finishing but that's expected in 17 year old. In the final third he needs to improve his decisions and final pass. He needs to mix it up in his dribbling as well. He is always trying to cut inside to use his stronger left foot. Although he can shoot and cross with his right foot, it can make him predictable.
Defensively he needs to improve as well. He needs to be more incisive, following his player because Amorim likes high pressure without the ball. He's getting good advices and help from Inácio, Hjulmand and Daniel Bragança, so he's gradually getting better.
Obviously with 17 years of age, he's still work in progress. But I'm almost certain he will be a top player. His ability and mentality will drive him to a successful career. We have produced alot of exciting players in our academy, Ronaldo, Figo, Rafael Leão and many others and he's up there with the very best. Even those weren't as impressive as Quenda at 17 years of age career wise and in terms of accomplishments."
You make some good points which I agree with.And you don't think, that might have been also connected by those players simply not getting used to the league or anything?
Same here. Sounds good as a marketing trick but the proposition is exactly the same one as with ETH back when it happened. With him we were also expecting a system to emerge. And that the player he went for would be key pieces for this exact system. It is also funny that you expect Ruben to go for a like for like imitation of his Sporting system when most managers when asked will tell you that adaptability is the key ingredient to being successful.
It is all good and well and obviously Ruben should be backed to bring in players that fit the system but stuff has to remain reasonable. Had we brought in Antony for 25-35 he wouldn't be looked at with so much anger right now.
I'd say biggest difference right now is you applying the comfort of hindsight towards ETH and being hopeful and optimistic towards Ruben. There was a time people were hopeful and optimistic towards ETH as well. Still led to bad decisions.
Thats funny to be honest. Once again, hindsight at full force.
The price is one of the corner stones of this transfer in terms of risk assessment. Nobody don't want the club to bring in talented young player with great potential. But the reality is that not all young players will realize that potential and given that we have limited ressources AND a squad that isn't great we can't just think that the same rules apply to us and maybe Bayern or Real. In our situation it might make more sense to bring in two 25 million players who will give you reliable 6.0-6.5/10 performances in key roles than one great talent who might be able to give you 8.0/10s here and there but only further down the line.
Plenty of clubs were following him already. For example today Record newspaper is saying that City and Liverpool are also interested in him.Makes sense
All the Portuguese scouts and journos have all raved over him as the next big thing out of Portugal recently well before Amorim joined
ETH was not at the club when Utd signed DVDB.Anthony did not convince me one bit and his signing was baffling, you could clearly see he lacked pace and physicality. Donny VDB also. ETH bought these players and stopped playing them.
Ruben is buying young players who meet his profile and Quenda also understands his system. He will mold them further. Ruben said when he joined, they will look at everything about a player in the recruitment aspect, including mentality.
Biggest difference between this manager and ETH is everything fans see and even complain about he addresses. He clocks players very quickly and everything he says makes sense.
ETH just waffles about a fabled process and his post match assessment was a solar system away from what fans saw. If Ruben is buying a player he already worked with, it is good, many managers who change a system use players who already know the system and build form there.
The price wasn't £50m as the unreliable Abola reported, it's less than that, Ornstien who is Tier 1 said €40m so it is around £33m, name any wingback who is more established we can buy for that price who is proven?
When we over pay fans complain and now we are doing good deals, we still complain. For reference Diallo was even more unknown before we paid a similar amount.