Indeed. He looks the special talent we need on the right. How often do you get such talented players who can play wing back? Meh, we’ll have to be content with signing solid but unspectacular ones I suppose.I'm gutted, he looked like young Saka.
Anyhow, bye Quenda, Tyler Dibling is my best friend now.
I think that having a right footed RWB makes more sense when your right-sided 10 is left-footed which is where Amad is most likely to be playing, IMO having 2 left footers on the right or 2 rightfooters on the left just makes you too narrowThis is kinda funny to read when Sporting hadn’t won that league in twenty years, and it was Amorim and his system which changed that and brought them some long awaited success. And last season the evolution of that system included playing a left footer at RWB for very specific reasons.
I think your stance of “right footer must play on right” is overly simplistic and ignores some important nuances of why Amorim set up the way he did with Quenda on the right.
And funnily enough, by far our most effective RWB this year has been….a left footer.
Are we ready for another Dutchie?We didn't miss out on him, because Chelsea was in a better position to deal with him. Also, it makes absolutely sense to let him grow for another season there. So, it makes sense for all parties.
He's got a release clause of £33m (just recently confirmed that it's valid again from Summer 25, after expiring last summer) which is likely cheaper than what Quenda cost. Now feels like it's him or we're fecked. I heard he prefers a move to Barcelona or Real but they don't seem interested so might have a outsider chance (if he doesn't join Chelsea too...). Liverpool could also be interested. Who knows...
Well the INEOS-Dutchies Zirkzee & MdL have been better than the Dutchies under Murtough / ETH (Malacia, Weghorst, VdB), so there's hopeAre we ready for another Dutchie?
You could see in the last games that we don't need a right-footed RWB for this system to work, just an upgrade on Dalot (who even did quite well compared to his ususal performances). If the wing backs stay higher up and help the attack and press (best example Dorgu vs Sociedad), it feels more like Amorim's system compared to when he used a five at the back with Dalot (often as LWB), Malacia and Mazraoui. Imagine a constant runner like Frimpong on the right flank and Amad or Garnacho occupying the right penalty area. It makes totally sense. No need to use a left-footed RWB at all cost.This is kinda funny to read when Sporting hadn’t won that league in twenty years, and it was Amorim and his system which changed that and brought them some long awaited success. And last season the evolution of that system included playing a left footer at RWB for very specific reasons.
I think your stance of “right footer must play on right” is overly simplistic and ignores some important nuances of why Amorim set up the way he did with Quenda on the right.
And funnily enough, by far our most effective RWB this year has been….a left footer.
Because simply no one else was in for them at those absurd valuations and our gullible recruitment team fell for the bluff again and again.Why do we always seem to succeed when paying stupid money for utterly bang average players like Antony, Harry Maguire, Rasmus Højlund, and Mason Mount?
And then always seem to fail when paying less money for the absolute elite talents such as Quenda, Bellingham, and Haaland?
It's like we are run by absolute morons.
I still can't believe we actually got Yoro over the line
I have found the term for this: kleptoparasitism.
“We must have the best recruitment in the world. Data analysis comes alongside recruitment. It doesn’t really exist here. We’re still in the last century on data analysis here." - SJRIt's there. We just started later than other clubs so it's behind and will take a while to catch up because of the resources you have to commit.
Yeah he seem to go the extra mile for mediocracy and give up easily for the top talentsWhy do we always seem to succeed when paying stupid money for utterly bang average players like Antony, Harry Maguire, Rasmus Højlund, and Mason Mount?
And then always seem to fail when paying less money for the absolute elite talents such as Quenda, Bellingham, and Haaland?
It's like we are run by absolute morons.
I still can't believe we actually got Yoro over the line
This. Although I would have liked him here I am not too sure that spending £35m - £40m on him is the best use of limited resources. Wilcox, Vivendi and Amorim need to scout another Heavensque signing for depth on the right side, if we get a buyer for Dalot then maybe go for Frimpong, he will transform that right side.Seemed a huge risk to pay that for such a young, unproven players. We're not in that financial position right now.
In my opinion Quenda should have been bought if we fount a buyer for Dalot. Quite frankly I'd sell Dalot as he's not suited for the RWBThis. Although I would have liked him here I am not too sure that spending £35m - £40m on him is the best use of limited resources. Wilcox, Vivendi and Amorim need to scout another Heavensque signing for depth on the right side, if we get a buyer for Dalot then maybe go for Frimpong, he will transform that right side.
You could see in the last games that we don't need a right-footed RWB for this system to work, just an upgrade on Dalot (who even did quite well compared to his ususal performances). If the wing backs stay higher up and help the attack and press (best example Dorgu vs Sociedad), it feels more like Amorim's system compared to when he used a five at the back with Dalot (often as LWB), Malacia and Mazraoui. Imagine a constant runner like Frimpong on the right flank and Amad or Garnacho occupying the right penalty area. It makes totally sense. No need to use a left-footed RWB at all cost.
Before Chelsea signed him, I already changed my mind that we should sign LWB (because we don’t have 2nd LWB with similar profile as Dorgu) and use Dalot and Mazraoui as inverted RWB instead, while playing Amad or Garnacho as wide forward on the right to provide threat on the right flank. I’m not gutted at all that we miss this one.
This is kinda funny to read when Sporting hadn’t won that league in twenty years, and it was Amorim and his system which changed that and brought them some long awaited success. And last season the evolution of that system included playing a left footer at RWB for very specific reasons.
I think your stance of “right footer must play on right” is overly simplistic and ignores some important nuances of why Amorim set up the way he did with Quenda on the right.
And funnily enough, by far our most effective RWB this year has been….a left footer.
It's insanity, you question whether these people actually watch football. Dalot is not a good wb neither is Maz, keep maz for rcb in a 3 and can provide depth. Sell Dalot or keep for squad depth however neither should be anywhere near our starting rwb if we want to progress. I'd happily have amad as rwb then sign a 10 like cherki from Lyon for his 22m release clause. Risk I know but the kind of risk we need to takeI’m not saying a left footed RWB has to be used for the system to work, just that a left footed RWB can and has worked in that system just as well. And I said that specifically in response to someone saying we should only play a right footer there. Sure, that’s an option, but the evidence suggests that doesn’t have to be the case for the system to work incredibly well.
Agreed that bringing in a more attacking runner on the right is going to help the system more than using players like Dalot, Maz or Malacia, but again, that comes down to their other attributes, not which foot they prefer.
Dalot shouldn’t be starting, and Mazraoui should be primarily playing at RCB. I don’t know how anyone could watch the difference Dorgu has made on the left and conclude that we should settle for Dalot or Maz on the right.
why not keep Amad and sign a good RWB instead? Amad has been our most dangerous attacker besides Bruno if he counts. He should be planned as our right no.10.It's insanity, you question whether these people actually watch football. Dalot is not a good wb neither is Maz, keep maz for rcb in a 3 and can provide depth. Sell Dalot or keep for squad depth however neither should be anywhere near our starting rwb if we want to progress. I'd happily have amad as rwb then sign a 10 like cherki from Lyon for his 22m release clause. Risk I know but the kind of risk we need to take
I thought this was a done deal to us to be honest
He’s incredibly shit anyway.
I mean he obviously isn’t.
We are getting more details from the Quenda deal. It's 51 million plus 23 million of add-ons and objectives. Some are achievable so the value can be higher. Dario Essugo to Chelsea is 22 millions which is criminal considering the reporter said Real Madrid did an approach but didn't want him for next year but for the 2026 season.
According to the reporter, United was indeed interested in Quenda and did the first offer for the player, but didn't offer more than 40 millions so Sporting accepted the Chelsea offer.
Yes he has but his best performances in the main this season have been at rwb. You would keep his attacking output plus adding a quality 10. Otherwise which rwb would you bring in that you feel would be a better option?why not keep Amad and sign a good RWB instead? Amad has been our most dangerous attacker besides Bruno if he counts. He should be planned as our right no.10.
He's getting better and better aerially from what I've seen and depending on the stats people want to gauge his aerial ability on, he looks like a CB who is showing the ability to be very complete. I think he's a young CB with all the right attributes for the premier league and he can be utilised both as a RCB or as a CCB in a 3 man backline. I would personally like to see him as the CCB in a 3 man backline and having both Diomande and Yoro as options in the backline potentially gives us the opportunity to create a very strong rest defense which is absolutely crucial for any coach who wants to play a more dominant brand of football in a higher line, which allows a higher volume of players to occupy the opponent's half of the pitch. If we can't do this as a team, we just won't be able to create enough chances. We will also a require a top class midfielder or a potentially top midfielder to create that strong foundation which would allow us to squeeze the pitch in a higher line.
Fabrizio Romano from what I've just read is reporting about United seriously looking at bringing in another CB. And I think that is the correct move and if Ayden Heaven can become a solid option for us on the left of the backline then I think someone like Diomande should be a serious option. Otherwise I feel the LCB position was probably more important to reinforce with maybe some like Dean Huijsen.
His meltdown made little sense when you look at the wider context. If you look at it at a base level it’s Quenda chose Chelsea over a club that had his former manager - how far have we fallen? With context Sporting accepted an offer higher than we were willing to pay PLUS him staying there for another year when we would want him instantly. Chelsea offered a total package more attractive than we did. It’s not a case of us losing out because of the state of our club as he argued.
I’m upset we’ll miss out on him, but I’m glad we didn’t buy him under those conditions.
His meltdown made little sense when you look at the wider context. If you look at it at a base level it’s Quenda chose Chelsea over a club that had his former manager - how far have we fallen? With context Sporting accepted an offer higher than we were willing to pay PLUS him staying there for another year when we would want him instantly. Chelsea offered a total package more attractive than we did. It’s not a case of us losing out because of the state of our club as he argued.
I’m upset we’ll miss out on him, but I’m glad we didn’t buy him under those conditions.
Paying Frimpong's £33m release clause and getting the best RWB around is arguably better than buying any good number 10 for twice the fee.Yes he has but his best performances in the main this season have been at rwb. You would keep his attacking output plus adding a quality 10. Otherwise which rwb would you bring in that you feel would be a better option?
I saw that tweet. I get the feeling that the account isn't all that reliable.Manchester United have ended their relationship with Jorge Mendes following Quenda’s move to Chelsea, as they weren’t informed by the agent. Ineos, driving this decision, will cut ties with any football agents who disrespect or exploit Manchester United.
Is there a link for this?Manchester United have ended their relationship with Jorge Mendes following Quenda’s move to Chelsea, as they weren’t informed by the agent. Ineos, driving this decision, will cut ties with any football agents who disrespect or exploit Manchester United.
Because they can find clubs stupid enough to buy their crocked players for silly fees. Where as all United can do is pay silly fees for crocked players from our rivals.Exactly.
But I am curious. How is it that Chelsea can spend silly money — crazy money — and we can’t?