Geovany Quenda | Ornstein: Chelsea agree 7-year deal with option of a further year. Will go to Chelsea in 2026.

I guess redcafe can switch to being annoyed about not getting him instead of being annoyed we're getting him now
 
Brailsford 1% rule is taking an effect now. Be 1% less stupid every time there's a chance for us to sign a player under conditions that allow other clubs to dictate our terms.

I wanted him. But under these terms? that he won't even play after we splashed the cash we could use to sign other positions we desperately need, while we're skint? no chance.
 
Ah feck off. He was one I was genuinely excited at the prospect of us signing.
 
I'm gutted, he looked like young Saka.

Anyhow, bye Quenda, Tyler Dibling is my best friend now.
Indeed. He looks the special talent we need on the right. How often do you get such talented players who can play wing back? Meh, we’ll have to be content with signing solid but unspectacular ones I suppose.
 
This is kinda funny to read when Sporting hadn’t won that league in twenty years, and it was Amorim and his system which changed that and brought them some long awaited success. And last season the evolution of that system included playing a left footer at RWB for very specific reasons.

I think your stance of “right footer must play on right” is overly simplistic and ignores some important nuances of why Amorim set up the way he did with Quenda on the right.

And funnily enough, by far our most effective RWB this year has been….a left footer.
I think that having a right footed RWB makes more sense when your right-sided 10 is left-footed which is where Amad is most likely to be playing, IMO having 2 left footers on the right or 2 rightfooters on the left just makes you too narrow
 
We didn't miss out on him, because Chelsea was in a better position to deal with him. Also, it makes absolutely sense to let him grow for another season there. So, it makes sense for all parties.


He's got a release clause of £33m (just recently confirmed that it's valid again from Summer 25, after expiring last summer) which is likely cheaper than what Quenda cost. Now feels like it's him or we're fecked. I heard he prefers a move to Barcelona or Real but they don't seem interested so might have a outsider chance (if he doesn't join Chelsea too...). Liverpool could also be interested. Who knows...
Are we ready for another Dutchie?
 
Chelsea are crazy,they've so many wingers,on long deals and they've two or three young lads bought in south America who haven't even arrived yet and now this lad. Surely they will hit trouble financially at some stage. Can't see clubs jumping to sign the likes of the Ukrainian lad. And I'd be shocked if the manager who talked to him is actually still the manager in 12months. O well.
 
Seemed a huge risk to pay that for such a young, unproven players. We're not in that financial position right now.
 
This is kinda funny to read when Sporting hadn’t won that league in twenty years, and it was Amorim and his system which changed that and brought them some long awaited success. And last season the evolution of that system included playing a left footer at RWB for very specific reasons.

I think your stance of “right footer must play on right” is overly simplistic and ignores some important nuances of why Amorim set up the way he did with Quenda on the right.

And funnily enough, by far our most effective RWB this year has been….a left footer.
You could see in the last games that we don't need a right-footed RWB for this system to work, just an upgrade on Dalot (who even did quite well compared to his ususal performances). If the wing backs stay higher up and help the attack and press (best example Dorgu vs Sociedad), it feels more like Amorim's system compared to when he used a five at the back with Dalot (often as LWB), Malacia and Mazraoui. Imagine a constant runner like Frimpong on the right flank and Amad or Garnacho occupying the right penalty area. It makes totally sense. No need to use a left-footed RWB at all cost.
 
Why do we always seem to succeed when paying stupid money for utterly bang average players like Antony, Harry Maguire, Rasmus Højlund, and Mason Mount?

And then always seem to fail when paying less money for the absolute elite talents such as Quenda, Bellingham, and Haaland?

It's like we are run by absolute morons.

I still can't believe we actually got Yoro over the line
 
Why do we always seem to succeed when paying stupid money for utterly bang average players like Antony, Harry Maguire, Rasmus Højlund, and Mason Mount?

And then always seem to fail when paying less money for the absolute elite talents such as Quenda, Bellingham, and Haaland?

It's like we are run by absolute morons.

I still can't believe we actually got Yoro over the line
Because simply no one else was in for them at those absurd valuations and our gullible recruitment team fell for the bluff again and again.

I can sense we are smarter now and surely no matter how good quenda might be, we can't be sitting and waiting for another year or give him an absurd contract
 
Before Chelsea signed him, I already changed my mind that we should sign LWB (because we don’t have 2nd LWB with similar profile as Dorgu) and use Dalot and Mazraoui as inverted RWB instead, while playing Amad or Garnacho as wide forward on the right to provide threat on the right flank. I’m not gutted at all that we miss this one.
 
It's there. We just started later than other clubs so it's behind and will take a while to catch up because of the resources you have to commit.
“We must have the best recruitment in the world. Data analysis comes alongside recruitment. It doesn’t really exist here. We’re still in the last century on data analysis here." - SJR

That's what Murtough during his tenure at United.
 
Why do we always seem to succeed when paying stupid money for utterly bang average players like Antony, Harry Maguire, Rasmus Højlund, and Mason Mount?

And then always seem to fail when paying less money for the absolute elite talents such as Quenda, Bellingham, and Haaland?

It's like we are run by absolute morons.

I still can't believe we actually got Yoro over the line
Yeah he seem to go the extra mile for mediocracy and give up easily for the top talents
 
Seemed a huge risk to pay that for such a young, unproven players. We're not in that financial position right now.
This. Although I would have liked him here I am not too sure that spending £35m - £40m on him is the best use of limited resources. Wilcox, Vivendi and Amorim need to scout another Heavensque signing for depth on the right side, if we get a buyer for Dalot then maybe go for Frimpong, he will transform that right side.
 
This. Although I would have liked him here I am not too sure that spending £35m - £40m on him is the best use of limited resources. Wilcox, Vivendi and Amorim need to scout another Heavensque signing for depth on the right side, if we get a buyer for Dalot then maybe go for Frimpong, he will transform that right side.
In my opinion Quenda should have been bought if we fount a buyer for Dalot. Quite frankly I'd sell Dalot as he's not suited for the RWB
 
Meh it seems like the best deal for him really, stay a bit longer at Sporting prepare yourself to move getting to play in your preferred position and not as a RB/RWB certainly seems like the better offer.

He is talented and I’m all for signing talented youth but he seemed a bit of a gamble for where we are at right now. Obvioulsy now the best option out there for us is Frimpong but I imagine if he is going to go anywhere this summer he’ll want to go to a champions league club and want paid handsomely for his services.

So back to the drawing board.
 
You could see in the last games that we don't need a right-footed RWB for this system to work, just an upgrade on Dalot (who even did quite well compared to his ususal performances). If the wing backs stay higher up and help the attack and press (best example Dorgu vs Sociedad), it feels more like Amorim's system compared to when he used a five at the back with Dalot (often as LWB), Malacia and Mazraoui. Imagine a constant runner like Frimpong on the right flank and Amad or Garnacho occupying the right penalty area. It makes totally sense. No need to use a left-footed RWB at all cost.

I’m not saying a left footed RWB has to be used for the system to work, just that a left footed RWB can and has worked in that system just as well. And I said that specifically in response to someone saying we should only play a right footer there. Sure, that’s an option, but the evidence suggests that doesn’t have to be the case for the system to work incredibly well.

Agreed that bringing in a more attacking runner on the right is going to help the system more than using players like Dalot, Maz or Malacia, but again, that comes down to their other attributes, not which foot they prefer.
Before Chelsea signed him, I already changed my mind that we should sign LWB (because we don’t have 2nd LWB with similar profile as Dorgu) and use Dalot and Mazraoui as inverted RWB instead, while playing Amad or Garnacho as wide forward on the right to provide threat on the right flank. I’m not gutted at all that we miss this one.

Dalot shouldn’t be starting, and Mazraoui should be primarily playing at RCB. I don’t know how anyone could watch the difference Dorgu has made on the left and conclude that we should settle for Dalot or Maz on the right.
 
This is kinda funny to read when Sporting hadn’t won that league in twenty years, and it was Amorim and his system which changed that and brought them some long awaited success. And last season the evolution of that system included playing a left footer at RWB for very specific reasons.

I think your stance of “right footer must play on right” is overly simplistic and ignores some important nuances of why Amorim set up the way he did with Quenda on the right.

And funnily enough, by far our most effective RWB this year has been….a left footer.

It's also absolutely true.

Nuance is a word used far too much here. It's football. It's not that complicated.

Look at the difference having a left footed player at LWB has made already.

We don't want our RWB and right sided 10(Amad) both coming inside. That's not nuance. It's being silly.
 
I’m not saying a left footed RWB has to be used for the system to work, just that a left footed RWB can and has worked in that system just as well. And I said that specifically in response to someone saying we should only play a right footer there. Sure, that’s an option, but the evidence suggests that doesn’t have to be the case for the system to work incredibly well.

Agreed that bringing in a more attacking runner on the right is going to help the system more than using players like Dalot, Maz or Malacia, but again, that comes down to their other attributes, not which foot they prefer.


Dalot shouldn’t be starting, and Mazraoui should be primarily playing at RCB. I don’t know how anyone could watch the difference Dorgu has made on the left and conclude that we should settle for Dalot or Maz on the right.
It's insanity, you question whether these people actually watch football. Dalot is not a good wb neither is Maz, keep maz for rcb in a 3 and can provide depth. Sell Dalot or keep for squad depth however neither should be anywhere near our starting rwb if we want to progress. I'd happily have amad as rwb then sign a 10 like cherki from Lyon for his 22m release clause. Risk I know but the kind of risk we need to take
 
It's insanity, you question whether these people actually watch football. Dalot is not a good wb neither is Maz, keep maz for rcb in a 3 and can provide depth. Sell Dalot or keep for squad depth however neither should be anywhere near our starting rwb if we want to progress. I'd happily have amad as rwb then sign a 10 like cherki from Lyon for his 22m release clause. Risk I know but the kind of risk we need to take
why not keep Amad and sign a good RWB instead? Amad has been our most dangerous attacker besides Bruno if he counts. He should be planned as our right no.10.
 
Seems he has greater ambitions than to he a wing back. Can’t blame him, he looks super talented.
 
Is Chelseas plan to just sign all the wingers. Looks like they might pay the fine and we are stuck with Sancho. I don’t know much about the player. Sure he is a talented player. But we need goalscorers and a new Keeper as priorities this summer
 
Last edited:
We are getting more details from the Quenda deal. It's 51 million plus 23 million of add-ons and objectives. Some are achievable so the value can be higher. Dario Essugo to Chelsea is 22 millions which is criminal considering the reporter said Real Madrid did an approach but didn't want him for next year but for the 2026 season.

According to the reporter, United was indeed interested in Quenda and did the first offer for the player, but didn't offer more than 40 millions so Sporting accepted the Chelsea offer.


I don’t for the life of me understand the Essugo deal. Why would he move to Chelsea considering their army of midfielders, plus they even have Reece James as an option there. I was quite high on Essugo and wanted us to have a look at him as a Ugarte backup, he will get lost at Chelsea and if he waited, he would’ve had more offers on the table. Barca, Madrid and others have all been looking at him given his performances this season. This also seems like an undersell from Sporting’s side, you guys surely could’ve got more for him.
 
Various sources have the same story today...

It seems that Quenda was targeted by United in January but he chose Chelsea instead, after they said he will play as a winger, rather than as a RWB, which is how United would have used him.

For me, that settles it as you do not want players who are not going to fit and despite the fact that it was Ruben Amorim who gave him his debut at such a tender age and brought him along in the Sporting team, he has decided to hitch his wagon to the Chelsea money train.

Fine...f**k him :lol:

Now, go for Frimpong. Despite the interest from Spain, United is still United. Show him that shiny new stadium...tell him its nearly finished...heck just say whatever it takes ;)
 
why not keep Amad and sign a good RWB instead? Amad has been our most dangerous attacker besides Bruno if he counts. He should be planned as our right no.10.
Yes he has but his best performances in the main this season have been at rwb. You would keep his attacking output plus adding a quality 10. Otherwise which rwb would you bring in that you feel would be a better option?
 
He's getting better and better aerially from what I've seen and depending on the stats people want to gauge his aerial ability on, he looks like a CB who is showing the ability to be very complete. I think he's a young CB with all the right attributes for the premier league and he can be utilised both as a RCB or as a CCB in a 3 man backline. I would personally like to see him as the CCB in a 3 man backline and having both Diomande and Yoro as options in the backline potentially gives us the opportunity to create a very strong rest defense which is absolutely crucial for any coach who wants to play a more dominant brand of football in a higher line, which allows a higher volume of players to occupy the opponent's half of the pitch. If we can't do this as a team, we just won't be able to create enough chances. We will also a require a top class midfielder or a potentially top midfielder to create that strong foundation which would allow us to squeeze the pitch in a higher line.

Fabrizio Romano from what I've just read is reporting about United seriously looking at bringing in another CB. And I think that is the correct move and if Ayden Heaven can become a solid option for us on the left of the backline then I think someone like Diomande should be a serious option. Otherwise I feel the LCB position was probably more important to reinforce with maybe some like Dean Huijsen.




I agree, having a player with the profile of Diomande would set us up really well. Him, Yoro, Heaven would increase the athleticism and speed in our back line. I really like Dean Huijsen as well. If we don’t go for either of them because they are expensive, I can see the club going for Branthwaite again. Given how two footed he is, he could easily play any one of the three CB roles. The only slight misgiving with him, is if he has the passing ability to play the wide CB roles, given they play an important part in progressing the play under Amorim’s system.
 
His meltdown made little sense when you look at the wider context. If you look at it at a base level it’s Quenda chose Chelsea over a club that had his former manager - how far have we fallen? With context Sporting accepted an offer higher than we were willing to pay PLUS him staying there for another year when we would want him instantly. Chelsea offered a total package more attractive than we did. It’s not a case of us losing out because of the state of our club as he argued.

I’m upset we’ll miss out on him, but I’m glad we didn’t buy him under those conditions.

Exactly.

But I am curious. How is it that Chelsea can spend silly money — crazy money — and we can’t?
 
His meltdown made little sense when you look at the wider context. If you look at it at a base level it’s Quenda chose Chelsea over a club that had his former manager - how far have we fallen? With context Sporting accepted an offer higher than we were willing to pay PLUS him staying there for another year when we would want him instantly. Chelsea offered a total package more attractive than we did. It’s not a case of us losing out because of the state of our club as he argued.

I’m upset we’ll miss out on him, but I’m glad we didn’t buy him under those conditions.

They're offering more money, it's a longer contract and it's London.
 
Manchester United have ended their relationship with Jorge Mendes following Quenda’s move to Chelsea, as they weren’t informed by the agent. Ineos, driving this decision, will cut ties with any football agents who disrespect or exploit Manchester United.
 
Yes he has but his best performances in the main this season have been at rwb. You would keep his attacking output plus adding a quality 10. Otherwise which rwb would you bring in that you feel would be a better option?
Paying Frimpong's £33m release clause and getting the best RWB around is arguably better than buying any good number 10 for twice the fee.
 
Manchester United have ended their relationship with Jorge Mendes following Quenda’s move to Chelsea, as they weren’t informed by the agent. Ineos, driving this decision, will cut ties with any football agents who disrespect or exploit Manchester United.
I saw that tweet. I get the feeling that the account isn't all that reliable.
 
Exactly.

But I am curious. How is it that Chelsea can spend silly money — crazy money — and we can’t?
Because they can find clubs stupid enough to buy their crocked players for silly fees. Where as all United can do is pay silly fees for crocked players from our rivals.