Adisa
likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
What happens when a party can't attract middle or working class voters.Tories one seat away from being largest party in Edinburgh - after the City voted 71% to remain...
What happens when a party can't attract middle or working class voters.Tories one seat away from being largest party in Edinburgh - after the City voted 71% to remain...
Whatever the problem is, it's been obvious for a while that he's not part of the solution.Its all well and good shouting 'not corbyn', but that ignores the two problems that labour have.
If not him then who? Anyone who thinks owen fecking smith is a more accomplished leader can shut up now. The others in the first leadership election did not even have the goddam common sense between them to vote against tory disability cuts in the middle of a labour leadership election campaign for crying out loud. Blair gutted the party of talent, he put his mates into safe seats and created an internal system that controlled who and who did not get a chance. His people still control it now. Labour really needs to find new blood throughout the PLP.
The second question is this. Replace corbyn with anyone. If they put forward the same policies, investment in people, education, health, increasing tax at the higher bracket, you know, labour stuff, they will get the exact same treatment by the media. The only labour leader in 40 years who didn't was blair, mainly because he was godfather to one of murdochs kids by the time he ran for PM. People call him a red tory, but that is not completely accurate, the media knew he would play their tune, because he was already part of that world.
There are severe problems labour have, and while corbyn is not the most dynamic leader around, I think the other problems are far bigger than he is.
This is what I find truly baffling. London will do the same in the geTories one seat away from ebeing largest party in Edinburgh - after the City voted 71% to remain...
Whatever the problem is, it's been obvious for a while that he's not part of the solution.
Corbyn has managed to find a way to convince the middle class that they're part of the one 1% he's after.This is what I find truly baffling. London will do the same in the ge
Its all well and good shouting 'not corbyn', but that ignores the two problems that labour have.
If not him then who? Anyone who thinks owen fecking smith is a more accomplished leader can shut up now. The others in the first leadership election did not even have the goddam common sense between them to vote against tory disability cuts in the middle of a labour leadership election campaign for crying out loud. Blair gutted the party of talent, he put his mates into safe seats and created an internal system that controlled who and who did not get a chance. His people still control it now. Labour really needs to find new blood throughout the PLP.
The second question is this. Replace corbyn with anyone. If they put forward the same policies, investment in people, education, health, increasing tax at the higher bracket, you know, labour stuff, they will get the exact same treatment by the media. The only labour leader in 40 years who didn't was blair, mainly because he was godfather to one of murdochs kids by the time he ran for PM. People call him a red tory, but that is not completely accurate, the media knew he would play their tune, because he was already part of that world.
There are severe problems labour have, and while corbyn is not the most dynamic leader around, I think the other problems are far bigger than he is.
Corbyn has managed to find a way to convince the middle class that they're part of the one 1% he's after.
Who was it on radio that couldn't give a straight answer as to whether taxes on people earning £70k a year should be increased?
If all they're going to do is wear a different colour rosette while pledging the same old rubbish, so be it. Without running for a position myself, the only direct thing I can do politically is vote and I'd much sooner vote for something I believe in than an random choice purely against something I don't. Unless there was a major difference in a key policy, I would probably focus my vote to the reverse that I will be doing at this election and put local issues before party policies post-Corbyn, purely because no party will offer me anything with the latter.Is it a fair assumption that you are in the minority and as long as someone who shares your views continue to lead the Labour party, they would be unelectable? If this is true, what would be your choice? Voting for a party that partially supports your views? Not vote? Rebel and vote Tory?
That's the problem. People earning £70k are already squeezed. Why would you lump someone earning £70k a year with someone earning £500k a year?People earning £70K plus are in the top 5% of earners in the country. The idea that taxing them would be hitting millions of middle england stalwarts is patently idiotic.
You keep saying 'corbyn has'.
What about the media that is being used to convince people that targeting the top 5% will affect them? As I have said, you can see the problem of media bias, then use their attacks on corbyn to attack him yourself, apparently without any irony.
Same here, if only everyone thought like this the political landscape would look different.I'd much sooner vote for something I believe in than an random choice purely against something I don't.
That's the problem. People earning £70k are already squeezed. Why would you lump someone earning £70k a year with someone earning £500k a year?
I'm not saying they're resentful of the rich, that's a whole different thing, really. I just think there's a lot of the "My life's the most important, you all want to hear what I'm doing, if it's not directly related to me it's stupid, therefore old folk are irrelevant" type of thing going on with some younger people. I blame social media.Please refer me to @Penna Because I certainly do not agree that the new generation are more selfish and resentful of the rich. I am 25 and my experience is that my generation are just as desperate to be successful in even more difficult circumstances.
This is why i'm not a fan of democracy. 1 man 1 vote - that means even the idiots get the same representation as the rest of us. That's unfair. I reckon we should be governed by a panel of subject matter experts who get to sit there for 10 years at a time. These experts can be elected every 10 years but only after they've bee pre-screened and proven to be qualified to lead the country in any given field. Anyone who joins the panel can no longer run a business, cannot have any family members in business or hold shares in any company. They should also be forbidden from holding any roles in business for the rest of their lives. In exchange they should be paid £100k a year for life.
I'm not saying they're resentful of the rich, that's a whole different thing, really. I just think there's a lot of the "My life's the most important, you all want to hear what I'm doing, if it's not directly related to me it's stupid, therefore old folk are irrelevant" type of thing going on with some younger people. I blame social media.
Of course, not all old people are paragons of virtue. However, they at least have some experience of a life lived, however they've lived it.
Is this a joke?I am
These youngsters also want everything good and want it for free, they need to spend some time down the pit and stop lazing around at uni.
I'm not saying they're resentful of the rich, that's a whole different thing, really. I just think there's a lot of the "My life's the most important, you all want to hear what I'm doing, if it's not directly related to me it's stupid, therefore old folk are irrelevant" type of thing going on with some younger people. I blame social media.
Of course, not all old people are paragons of virtue. However, they at least have some experience of a life lived, however they've lived it.
That's a good point.I'd say it's more a case of the Internet Generation Vs the Non Internet Generation.
I'd love to know how many of the Older Generation actually talk to their Children and Grand Children about politics and brexit. I see so many soundbites of older people claiming they're voting Brexit/Tories to get the country back for their Children... I wonder how many actually asked them if that's what they wanted...?
In my admittedly limited experience, very few. When I go to watch the non-league team I follow, the group around us is almost exclusively grandparents and their grandkids and when the topic of Brexit came up at the start of pre-season, it was pretty clear that for a few of them it was the first time they'd heard how the other had voted.I'd say it's more a case of the Internet Generation Vs the Non Internet Generation.
I'd love to know how many of the Older Generation actually talk to their Children and Grand Children about politics and brexit. I see so many soundbites of older people claiming they're voting Brexit/Tories to get the country back for their Children... I wonder how many actually asked them if that's what they wanted...?
Is this a joke?
Tories just won the West Midlands mayoralty.
Yeah, should've been a relatively comfortable win.Is that a surprise? Lots of wealthy market towns round there.
I feel worse. In Scotland, I really hoped Lab/Lib voters would rather 2nd pref SNP over Tories but the opposite is true. Just seems daft to me.
Would this suggest that the SNP are likely to lose a few seats in the general, or that their position is stronger as the opposition is now more evenly split?FINAL SCOTTISH RESULTS
SNP
431 Seats Change −7
Conservative
276 Seats Change +164
Labour
262 Seats Change −133
Liberal Democrat
67 Seats Change −3
Green
19 Seats Change +5
Independent
172 Seats Change −26
Still haven't quite endorsed the Tories, thank feck. Close though, worrying times ahead.
Think it's based on people voting the same as they did yesterday, which would be an 11 point lead.That's basically the best case scenario isn't it?