You've misunderstood what I'm saying slightly I think
Where does that 55% tax figure come from? For each penny earned above £150k...
I have a feeling the shift is temporary. Brexit doesn't go according to plan...and they're back.At least UKIP are d.e.a.d.
Indeed.My point was that, while your figures are the headline rates and correct, the reality is not the same. The ONS figures are created from actual tax paid, that is, they are what tax levels actually are once accountants, deferrals, share options and so forth have been used.
The reality is that the bottom 10% pay more of their income in tax than the top 10% no matter what the headline figures suggest.
I got talking to a 95-year old Greek man who lives in London outside mine. He said he'd just retired today and was celebrating by going on a piss-up.
At least UKIP are d.e.a.d.
Indeed.
Taxes in the uk are laughably low, this is the reason nothing that is funded with tax money works.high taxes on those least able to afford them
Taxes in the uk are laughably low, this is the reason nothing that is funded with tax money works.
What is the correct size of government spending then? 70% 20% 50%?Taxes in the uk are laughably low, this is the reason nothing that is funded with tax money works.
I've definitely been less happy since I cared about politics. It's the recurring realisation that most of the country has very different views that hurts.
I pay 40% jusr in income tax where in the uk i would pay 20. God knows what my final figure is after non income taxes.As the figures I quote show, the poorest people in our society pay 42% of every penny they earn in taxes. That is not low in an economy that requires discretionary spending. It is insanely high in an economy that also requires 40%+ of earnings to be spent on the roof over your head.
But that kind of misses the point. The example I gave is talking about relative taxation, the poorest pay more, as a percentage of income, than the richest. Our entire tax system is regressive, and it is crippling the country.
To be fair, the younger 18-40 category have quite progressive views. Give it 10-15 years until the baby boomer cnuts finally die off and then we'll see a shift towards more progressive politics. I'm also certain the Tories will have fecked us over immeasurably by then too which should swing the tide the other way.
Compare the country by the decade. It wasn't long ago that we were chemically castrating national hero's because they were gay, or the conservative party could outright campaign on the notion that if you vote for Labour you must like black people.Young people have always had more progressive views than the average. That doesn't mean the country will get more progressive over time, because people change their views as they get older.
Young people have always had more progressive views than the average. That doesn't mean the country will get more progressive over time, because people change their views as they get older.
Compare the country by the decade. It wasn't long ago that we were chemically castrating national hero's because they were gay, or the conservative party could outright campaign on the notion that if you vote for Labour you must like black people.
They'll no doubt hang on to their seat on BBC Question Time.At least UKIP are d.e.a.d.
Historically perhaps, but with issues facing young people such as getting on the ladder, wages failing to increase in line with inflation and cost of living, as well as the effects of globalisation, I can see them championing their progressive views all the way into middle age.
We just need to get rid of the old cnuts who yearn for good ol days of the empire, racist lingo, and selfishly fecking up a future none of them will be alive for.
We just need to get rid of the old cnuts who yearn for good ol days of the empire, racist lingo, and selfishly fecking up a future none of them will be alive for.
This is why i'm not a fan of democracy. 1 man 1 vote - that means even the idiots get the same representation as the rest of us. That's unfair. I reckon we should be governed by a panel of subject matter experts who get to sit there for 10 years at a time. These experts can be elected every 10 years but only after they've bee pre-screened and proven to be qualified to lead the country in any given field. Anyone who joins the panel can no longer run a business, cannot have any family members in business or hold shares in any company. They should also be forbidden from holding any roles in business for the rest of their lives. In exchange they should be paid £100k a year for life.
This is why i'm not a fan of democracy. 1 man 1 vote - that means even the idiots get the same representation as the rest of us. That's unfair. I reckon we should be governed by a panel of subject matter experts who get to sit there for 10 years at a time. These experts can be elected every 10 years but only after they've bee pre-screened and proven to be qualified to lead the country in any given field. Anyone who joins the panel can no longer run a business, cannot have any family members in business or hold shares in any company. They should also be forbidden from holding any roles in business for the rest of their lives. In exchange they should be paid £100k a year for life.
A working class born leader, who'll give the impression they'll be tighter on immigration until people stop fearing it and wake up. Not happening though with the Blairites.As long as labour give the impression they're at war with the middle class, this trend will not cease. They even losing battle for working class because those ones are convinced they are poor because of immigration.
I don't even know where to start untangling this mess.
Let's not forget the radical changes introduced in the wake of WWII. Imagine what the country, and the world for that matter, would be like if the ruling elite had had free reign and not been forced to stand by as the NHS and so many socialist reforms were introduced. The older generation is/was certainly not all bad. Having said that, I would definitely encourage more youngsters to get involved and vote. It's no bad thing, imo, that so many of them reject MSM and look to unfiltered sources for their news (first hand accounts, videos, etc).Historically perhaps, but with issues facing young people such as getting on the ladder, wages failing to increase in line with inflation and cost of living, as well as the effects of globalisation, I can see them championing their progressive views all the way into middle age.
We just need to get rid of the old cnuts who yearn for good ol days of the empire, racist lingo, and selfishly fecking up a future none of them will be alive for.