If the numbers being thrown around are real we'd be looking at Bale plus Lloris for de Gea plus 50M plus what for Lloris? 30M? So a step down in keeper, albeit smaller than with other keepers, 4 fewer years of service (age difference) and 80M.
Yup, it was an accepted undisclosed offer from a PL club. If i'm not mistaken Levy said that he was willing to accept the same amount proposed by Real Madrid but in Pounds instead of Euros.
It's not a quote per se, it's from phillippe Auclair, he said that on RMC and a few weeks later the offer was confirmed by Perez.
I tend to trust him but you never know.
Have to make sure this doesn't turn into a De Gea thread, or a De Gea vs Valdes thread but which of these do you guys prefer?
Option 1:
De Gea
RB CB CB LB
Blind
Herrera Di Maria
Mata
Rooney CF
or Option 2:
Valdes
RB CB CB LB
Blind Herrera
Bale Rooney Di Maria
CF
I guess what I'm really asking is, is Bale worth losing De Gea for? Everyone knows how difficult it is to find a world class goalkeeper who could be your #1 for over a decade. Will De Gea want to return to Spain, due to it being his homeland, eventually? I don't know.
It's a tough choice, but I'd say to stick with De Gea. If we are really after Bale, which I doubt it, and Madrid are willing to sell, which I doubt it, then I hope De Gea will not be involved at all in the deal.
Have to make sure this doesn't turn into a De Gea thread, or a De Gea vs Valdes thread but which of these do you guys prefer?
Option 1:
De Gea
RB CB CB LB
Blind
Herrera Di Maria
Mata
Rooney CF
or Option 2:
Valdes
RB CB CB LB
Blind Herrera
Bale Rooney Di Maria
CF
I guess what I'm really asking is, is Bale worth losing De Gea for? Everyone knows how difficult it is to find a world class goalkeeper who could be your #1 for over a decade. Will De Gea want to return to Spain, due to it being his homeland, eventually? I don't know.
It's a tough choice, but I'd say to stick with De Gea. If we are really after Bale, which I doubt it, and Madrid are willing to sell, which I doubt it, then I hope De Gea will not be involved at all in the deal.
As far as keeping De Gea goes, if Utd turned down the offer and it meant De Gea stayed until he retired then you'd say fair enaugh, but realistically it would be for 2/3 years then he's off.
Would keeping him for a few more years be worth more than potentially missing out on Bale? If he went to Chelsea / City it would be a nightmare.
Hazard...... Costa....... Bale
Silva.......Aguero.......Bale
Of course Utd would be in for him regardless of selling David but just putting the scenario out there. We'd miss out on both Reus and Bale since Reus would be his replacement at Madrid.
Not having any realistic alternatives out there would be my worry
Dave has been great for the last 18 months but if we have to lose him in order to get Bale then I will drive him to the airport myself (as long as its Manchester or Liverpool)
Like the look of that, or maybe Rooney in midfield next to Di Maria and RVP as lone striker, but that team will have lots of pace in/creativity in midfield and should be pretty solid at the back.
Would love to see Bale here, an actual attacking improvement for sure, however not at the cost of Super Dave, he's one of the very few I'd consider a true red still in the squad, will be unhappy if he leaves regardless of who replaces him. And still, I can't help but think Bale isn't the type of player we're desperate for.
Like the look of that, or maybe Rooney in midfield next to Di Maria and RVP as lone striker, but that team will have lots of pace in/creativity in midfield and should be pretty solid at the back.
I just think we're not really solving anything if we're going to continue playing Di Maria wide, but paying god knows what for Bale only to play him where Di Maria is most effective. Plus i really like Herrera, and would prefer to see Rooney up front.
Name some keepers you would be OK with that we can obtain and explain how they'd fair better than Howard, Barthez, Taibi, Goram, Ricardo, Bosnich, Carroll, Lindegaard, etc. Fact is, even SAF has had a horrible time replacing keepers.
All these line-ups with the Blind/Herrera/Di Maria midfield trio are a waste of time, LvG barely plays Herrera as it is and has seemingly decided that Di Maria can't play in midfield in this league unless it's in the 3-5-2 with the safety net. The fact is it's a midfield built for La Liga but too weak for the PL, and you might as well factor in his boy Strootman to any fantasy line-ups as he is more likely than Bale, Pogba or any other more exciting signing.
He would have done sod all today. Exactly the sort of game he goes missing, no space whatsoever to play in and players doubling up every time anyone gets their head up.
As far as keeping De Gea goes, if Utd turned down the offer and it meant De Gea stayed until he retired then you'd say fair enaugh, but realistically it would be for 2/3 years then he's off.
Would keeping him for a few more years be worth more than potentially missing out on Bale? If he went to Chelsea / City it would be a nightmare.
Hazard...... Costa....... Bale
Silva.......Aguero.......Bale
Of course Utd would be in for him regardless of selling David but just putting the scenario out there. We'd miss out on both Reus and Bale since Reus would be his replacement at Madrid.
Not having any realistic alternatives out there would be my worry
If Bale is available and we don't want to sell De Gea, we will still be able to stump up the cash for Bale. Just because De Gea stays doesn't mean we can't buy him.
Bale revealed his love for Real goes back to his childhood. “I liked watching Real Madrid on TV,” he said. “They always had the best players and played the best football.
^ Why Real always get the best players. It's momentum.
Bale revealed his love for Real goes back to his childhood. “I liked watching Real Madrid on TV,” he said. “They always had the best players and played the best football.
^ Why Real always get the best players. It's momentum.
Despite what Bale says, I don't think Madrid will be all that fussy for keeping him in the summer. No one in England can afford to pay the sort of £££ needed to buy him except us.
Despite what Bale says, I don't think Madrid will be all that fussy for keeping him in the summer. No one in England can afford to pay the sort of £££ needed to buy him except us.
Don't think his link play with team mates is very good and it stands out when he plays for them, he has great end product which but his general game isn't really up to scratch at times. Think the fans are getting on his back if he misses good chances or doesn't set up team mates. They are a tough audience to please!
Despite what Bale says, I don't think Madrid will be all that fussy for keeping him in the summer. No one in England can afford to pay the sort of £££ needed to buy him except us.
Real fans are unbelievable, if true. Scored in the Champions League final in his first season just 8 months ago and always speaks of his desire to stay at the club.
"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,856
Not all, but a lot of Madrid fans are stupid. Who's the intelligent one? Probably the one who just settled for calling him a useless wanker. I don't like them as a club and again it's not all the fans, but the club have imposed themselves in the minds of lots of supporters and they just cannot be rational. They won 4-1 and booed a player? It's a nonsense. If Bale wants to play for a club with fickle fans, good luck to him..
I do think Ronaldo has quite a bit to answer for in regards to Bale. The guy went a long way to winning him two medals last season, despite his own minimal input even into the final he was fit to play in. Imagine the pressure Ronaldo would have faced if he'd done that much scoring, but disappeared in the Champions League final defeat to Atletico Madrid, having also lost the title to them. Probably wouldn't have won the Ballon d'or either and we know how much he loves those too. Not to mention the countless goals Bale set him up to score, compared to very few going back the other way.
Ever since his huff, the fans are booing Bale and the media criticising him. Even booing the very next game after he created both and scored the late winner in a 2-1 win, while Ronaldo got sent off and nearly wrecked Real Madrid's season with what for most players would have been a 6 match ban.
10 goals this season after 20 games. Scoring a worldie winner against Barcelona and arguably the second most important goal in Real Madrid's history after the Ramos one half an hour before, in his first season at the club. Team winning 4-1 to take a lead in La Liga with a game in hand. Only at Real Madrid eh.
I know his general play hasn't been as crisp as you'd want it, but it's frankly ridiculous and anyone that uses that as a reason to suggest Bale's having a rubbish season or isn't still a long way better than a whole load of attacking midfielders with the most bountiful reputations, is a long way off the mark.
The booing is obviously not right, but despite his output being good, Bale has had a really disappointing season. Often not involved in games, dodgy touch, sometimes a bit selfish (not to the extent the media say though). He hasn't kicked on the way people expected after his good debut season.
Bite my head off but I'm not keen on Bale at all. Yes, we need players with speed but surely there are other players who won't cost what Bale will? I just think, and as someone else said, his overall game is lacking and he's not good enough individually for me to want him at United.
Bite my head off but I'm not keen on Bale at all. Yes, we need players with speed but surely there are other players who won't cost what Bale will? I just think, and as someone else said, his overall game is lacking and he's not good enough individually for me to want him at United.
If we changed to 433 and he replicated his final Spurs season then he would be worth it. It'd be nice to have a 15+ league scorer that's not a striker.