The Neviller
New Member
I like the cut of your gib Nev.
I imagine you are in a club of one with that!
I like the cut of your gib Nev.
I didn't know that unpredicable means "hit and miss". People are mistaking unpredictabilty for inconsistency. Ronalidinho was unpredictable, most of these kind of players are unpredictable. Granted nani's corners are poor but his crosses aren't exactly poor. Infact sometimes he provides some excellent crosses. I don't want to go to youtube to prove that. His inconsistency is really exagerated over here. Valencia wasn't great at the start of last season while nani was consistently great at the start of the season. Its only after coming back from injury that he struggled a bit. He again looks better and why would we want to sell him when he is among selected few players in our squad who can provide a moment of brilliance.
United would be dreadfully boring with Valencia and Bale as our full time starting wingers.
United would be dreadfully boring with Valencia and Bale as our full time starting wingers.
Not that I can see it happening but I struggle to think of anything less boring.
It's in the dna of the club to play pacy wingers. It's why we're very rarely ever boring to watch.
I think he meant one-dimensional. Which is a sentiment I agree with.
2 players who were IMO more naturally gifted than either Valencia or Bale.Were United boring with Sharpe and Kanchelskis?
That is like saying the 1999 side would have been equally as interesting with a right footed and a left footed Beckham on either flank.
Not that I can see it happening but I struggle to think of anything less boring. .
The pace of the wingers isn't the issue. Untied has a proud history of having at least one predictable/truly magical winger on one side and a more predictable one on the other.It's in the dna of the club to play pacy wingers. It's why we're very rarely ever boring to watch.
TBF we only use him there in emergencies....... I think in future years we will begin to groan when we see Young's name on the teamsheet in the number 10 slot.
2 players who were more naturally gifted than either Valencia or Bale.
There's nothing naturally gifted about Lee Sharpe, a player who made the most of his limited abilities....
For my money unless we are overhauling our current midfield we'd be bland with 2 identical predictable wingers on either flank. Because once there plan A trick fails to work we'd have nada else to offer.
My point is with our current center midfield set up it would be.Luckily then we could fall back on Plan B aka the substitution.
But anyway, we don't have Bale and I don't think we should go for him personally so it's a moot debate.
If you were saying it's better to have a mixture of styles on each side (Beckham/Giggs, Valencia/Nani) then I agree with you. I just disagree that direct and pacy wing play is boring. I don't think you could ever call it that.
2 players who were IMO more naturally gifted than either Valencia or Bale.
My point is with our current center midfield set up it would be.
I don't see how what I said has changed. It's just others who assumed I was saying United could never be entertaining with those 2 as wingers.That's not what you said though
They also had a far superior collection of central midfield players playing with them compared to anything we have now.Regardless, they both played the exact same way and they were never boring.
There's nothing naturally gifted about Lee Sharpe, a player who made the most of his limited abilities (according to him and I agree)
I think he meant one-dimensional. Which is a sentiment I agree with.
So why worsen it by adding another narrow dimension to our opposite flank on a full time basis?We are one dimensional now! You pretty much always will be when you play 4-4-2 with our type of midfield.
There's nothing naturally gifted about Lee Sharpe, a player who made the most of his limited abilities (according to him and I agree)
No thanks, not as good as Nani so why spunk a huge transfer fee on someone who is no better than what we have?
No thanks, not as good as Nani so why spunk a huge transfer fee on someone who is no better than what we have?
So why worsen it by adding another narrow dimension to our opposite flank on a full time basis?
We'd also have cemented the fact that United only has a plan A. Get it wide and cross. We'd be piss easy to stop for most smart teams.It's actually a wider dimension if you want to be literal Chief!
Because like Valencia, it works best for a 4-4-2. Everyone knows what he is going to do, most importantly so do the strikers which is why they seem to get goals when he is in the side. Bale on the other side would do similarly, so we would have 2 sources of reliable quality deliveries coming from either side rather than just one.....
We'd also have cemented the fact that United only has a plan A. Get it wide and cross. We'd be piss easy to stop for most smart teams.