Shane88
Actually Nostradamus
The big actors are probably set for life from the show so might not be afraid of speaking out, that's even if they have any grievances.
It happens!
Channing Tatum:
“I’ll be honest. I fecking hate that movie,” Tatum said of the live-action “G.I. Joe” adaptation on Howard Stern’s radio show. “I was pushed into doing it. The script wasn’t any good."
George Clooney on his role as Batman:
“With hindsight it’s easy to look back at this and go ‘Woah, that was really shit and I was really bad in it.'”
James Franco:
“‘Your Highness’? That movie sucks,” Franco bluntly told GQ. “You can’t get around that.”
Sally Field (Spiderman 2):
"It’s really hard to find a three-dimensional character in it, and you work it as much as you can, but you can’t put 10 pounds of shit in a 5-pound bag.”
Ben Affleck:
"I hate Daredevil so much"
Halle Berry:
"First of all, I want to thank Warner Bros. Thank you for putting me in a piece of sh*t, god-awful movie. You know, it was just what my career needed, you know? I was at the top, and then Catwoman just plummeted me to the bottom.”
It happens!
Channing Tatum:
“I’ll be honest. I fecking hate that movie,” Tatum said of the live-action “G.I. Joe” adaptation on Howard Stern’s radio show. “I was pushed into doing it. The script wasn’t any good."
George Clooney on his role as Batman:
“With hindsight it’s easy to look back at this and go ‘Woah, that was really shit and I was really bad in it.'”
James Franco:
“‘Your Highness’? That movie sucks,” Franco bluntly told GQ. “You can’t get around that.”
Sally Field (Spiderman 2):
"It’s really hard to find a three-dimensional character in it, and you work it as much as you can, but you can’t put 10 pounds of shit in a 5-pound bag.”
Ben Affleck:
"I hate Daredevil so much"
Halle Berry:
"First of all, I want to thank Warner Bros. Thank you for putting me in a piece of sh*t, god-awful movie. You know, it was just what my career needed, you know? I was at the top, and then Catwoman just plummeted me to the bottom.”
Exactly. Her burning the city alive isn’t the problem. It’s the cheap way they went about showing it happening.True, she is a tyrant, but she wasn't the type who wanted her subjects dead or someone who wanted to pillage and take away their wealth. She wanted them alive, prosperous and accepting of her authority over them.
So the point was when the city surrended to her, there was no need for her to burn the people alive since she had got what she wanted.
Except Dany wasn't someone interested in pillaging and murdering like any common tyrant until the previous episode, so your sarcasm doesn't work. She wanted absolute subjugation/obedience and got it when they surrendered. Her becoming the Mad Queen was quite understandable, but there is no justification for the rushed way they went about it.
Her descent was foreshadowed far more in both books and show than Alexander the Great's massacre of Persepolis so its actually quite analogous.
21 seconds in
The actors/actresses all fecking hate it .
Yeah, I also feel the writers could have done better with Alexander the Great pillaging, plundering and burning the city of Persepolis. I mean he was educated by Aristotle after all and they easily could have just conquered and looted as they did to other cities with their alleged honor but they murdered most all the innocent men including old ones and young, enslaved and raped most of the women and then burned the entire city to the ground. Really out of character for Alexander compared to how he was written at other points in his story arc.
Emilia Clarke has been terrible up until this point. It's only the last few episodes where the writing has really shat the bed that she's come out of it loooking like she might actually be able to act. It would be ironic if it damaged her career after she learned to do something other than speak loudly and raise her eyebrows.I'm not surprised. They've invested ten years of their careers in this - people like Emilia and Kit especially will have turned down various job offers because the filming would've clashed with this - they've been away from home for months on end each year, done all of the press tours and interviews which are just monotonous days after days of saying and doing the same things. And at the end of it all the show runners - the people who have been "leading" them all these years gave them some shaky plotting in Season 7 and then delivered a complete car crash of a Season 8, shown zero to no enthusiasm, and tarnished the reputation of a show that the cast and production teams have given their lives to. All because "hey feck you guys we've got Star Wars to look forward to, hopefully your stock isn't too badly damaged by the shit show we've made hahahaha *snort*"
In a just world acting talent would be more important than your popularity, but we live in a world where Adam Sandler would rather make Billy Madison copies than films like Punch-Drunk Love.Emilia Clarke has been terrible up until this point. It's only the last few episodes where the writing has really shat the bed that she's come out of it loooking like she might actually be able to act. It would be ironic if it damaged her career after she learned to do something other than speak loudly and raise her eyebrows.
This is from 2016:
Daenerys is effectively her father (genetically speaking).
Her having a sudden psychotic break (like Joanna of Castile) following the loss of her best friend, her father figure, her army, her lover doesn't warrant 'dvelopment' as such. If you have a predisposition to psychosis, it can happen at any time.
It's a sudden snap because it was a sudden snap.
Just because you don't like it, it doesn't mean it's not a vaild plot point.
It used to be a TV show. Now it's a movie franchise with feature length episodes. The medium has changed.It's definitely a valid plot - I'd be the first person to say feck off to anyone who says it shouldn't have happened. Jaime being addicted to Cersei and going back to her is also believable. But the problem is that the show runners were given the chance to make more episodes to lead up to these but said "nah, we can finish it in 6 episodes". The complete rush job proves otherwise.
Oh come off it. Deadwood is a movie because HBO offered them a movie ten years after the original run. GoT was pitched as a ten part episodic TV show, a book a season, until D&D shifted the goalposts.It used to be a TV show. Now it's a movie franchise with feature length episodes. The medium has changed.
When Deadwood releases its movie, it too will have a shift in pacing from the series.
Emilia Clarke has been terrible up until this point. It's only the last few episodes where the writing has really shat the bed that she's come out of it loooking like she might actually be able to act. It would be ironic if it damaged her career after she learned to do something other than speak loudly and raise her eyebrows.
Those plot points are all believable, even predictable. Even Arya killing the Nice King is.It's definitely a valid plot - I'd be the first person to say feck off to anyone who says it shouldn't have happened. Jaime being addicted to Cersei and going back to her is also believable. But the problem is that the show runners were given the chance to make more episodes to lead up to these but said "nah, we can finish it in 6 episodes". The complete rush job proves otherwise.
Goes back to what Mr Pigeon said about a just world. Someone so bad at acting getting paid that much to be bad at acting. The mind boggles. I just find the irony of it finally having a negative impact on her coming about when she actually put in a half decent performance amusing.Her wages per episode is one of the reasons it was cut to 6 this season so that and the fact she isn't a good actress means I dont feel too sorry for her .
Hasn't it been said that HBO would have done 9 full seasons? How's that tie in with people's wages ending the show early?Her wages per episode is one of the reasons it was cut to 6 this season so that and the fact she isn't a good actress means I dont feel too sorry for her .
Hasn't it been said that HBO would have done 9 full seasons? How's that tie in with people's wages ending the show early?
I'm convinced it's D&D wanting out to do other stuff but still wanting to end it on their terms.
Anyway, that petition has passed one million.
Hasn't it been said that HBO would have done 9 full seasons? How's that tie in with people's wages ending the show early?
I'm convinced it's D&D wanting out to do other stuff but still wanting to end it on their terms.
Anyway, that petition has passed one million.
If you added up the runtime of this season's episodes, I bet there wouldn't be that much difference from previous seasons. All this talk about rushing is probably a bit overstated...
Loads of people have mentioned the number of episodesIt’s clearly rushed, and the complaints don’t really have anything to do with the duration and number of episodes. The show established a certain pace and that creates a certain expectation. The first two episodes of the season were more in keeping with how the show traditionally operated, and the last two have been jarring in comparison.
Loads of people have mentioned the number of episodes
Anyway, not going to argue just making a point....
Loads of people have mentioned the number of episodes
Anyway, not going to argue just making a point....
1 episode for Team Living vs Team Dead, 1 episode for Team Dragon vs King's Landing.The choice to kick off the season with two extremely slow episodes has looked more and more bizarre every week.
It's not that I didn't enjoy those episodes (I kind of did, they were well acted with some decent dialogue here in there, although at times very fanservicey) but when you have six episodes to finish a story with loads of plot points to get through, it's probably not a good idea to waste 1/3 of your time on people chatting in a castle. Those kind of episodes are great when you have seasons to go, but not when you're pushed for time and as we see now, forced to wrap up plot lines with no time at all.
I get you can't just be thrown straight in to a great big battle, but I absolutely feel like basically everything they did in those first two episodes could have been condensed in to the first one. Very little was actually advanced in that time and then hey presto, you have 4 episodes to write the battle of the living and the dead, the battle against cersei and her armies and the fall of Daenerys. Obviously it's all going to be rushed and silly with zero pacing (that was inevitable regardless) so why compound that by spending 2 episodes pissing about?
Well I'm looking forward to it. I'll be coming here after to see the meltdowns too...Someone earlier in the thread posted something talking about how the runtime for an episode was important as to why it still feels rushed. If you can find it, it's interesting reading.
But also, it was rushed to an end point when they announced the last 2 seasons. There was just too much to ever end in that time.
Don't get me wrong, I don't see how they could ever end it well to please most people anyway. I don't think even the books (if they ever come out) will manage that. But there is at least merit to the rushed argument.
Yea, its been said a million times in this thread. Personally, if I didn't frequent this thread it wouldn't be my first thought (it still isn't).Folk have, yes, because they are searching for reasons why it has been rushed.
You seemed to be suggesting that folk are overstating how hurried this has been, simply because the episodes are longer and there’s probably not much difference to the standard ten-episode season.
The problem however(well, a part of it), lies with how quickly they are scrambling through the plot. A standard ten-episode season wouldn’t have been adequate for the story left to tell.
But it's all part of our arc.you guys are all being a bunch of mary sues. cut it out
It's still shorter, and it's to do with what that time is spent on. They've probably spent a grand total of ten minutes this season on reasons why Dany would fall into madness, which is about the same amount of time they've spent on Arya and Gendry exchanging looks before pushing rope.If you added up the runtime of this season's episodes, I bet there wouldn't be that much difference from previous seasons. All this talk about rushing is probably a bit overstated...
Yea, its been said a million times in this thread. Personally, if I didn't frequent this thread it wouldn't be my first thought (it still isn't).
I'm one of those that is fine with how the season has gone though...
Well I'm looking forward to it. I'll be coming here after to see the meltdowns too...