Judas
Open to offers
What sort of bizarre take is saying Barca are playing a blinder
They do supposedly want Rice and Bellingham next year though.
Yeah, just reinforces the notion that this is a club-driven brief to pressure United.Exactly. If there was indeed anything in this, then we'd be getting a report from one of the Chelsea-affiliated journalists by now (not referring to Matt Law and Jacob Steinberg here).
I've seen absolutely nothing from any English based journos, not even the crappy clickbait ones!Yeah, just reinforces the notion that this is a club-driven brief to pressure United.
None of us should be surprised after seeing Laporta's public games.
I really wish that United just called their bluff and moved on.Yeah, just reinforces the notion that this is a club-driven brief to pressure United.
None of us should be surprised after seeing Laporta's public games.
Yeah, the only English journalists to comment on Frenkie at all today have all been in a somewhat positive aspect in terms of moving to United.I've seen absolutely nothing from any English based journos, not even the chappy clickbait ones!
Wouldn't surprise me if in the past Chelsea did offer what's reported then when they were told no, backed off and watched what happened between United and Barca.Yeah, the only English journalists to comment on Frenkie at all today have all been in a somewhat positive aspect in terms of moving to United.
Radion silent regarding Chelsea.
I understand to an extent why people might come to this conclusion but for me, we simply can't back down now.I really wish that United just called their bluff and moved on.
I'm guessing you're referring to this article, right? Here's the relevant passage:Again aggregator sites twisting the quotes for attention and to get a rise out of United fans.
The article said Chelsea (apparently) offered or wanted to offer €60m and two players. Barca said no, we want cash only and didn't listen to the offer. The article didn't say Chelsea were considering it, they said Chelsea either did or wanted to offer that and was told no.
Els londinencs voldrien incloure Frenkie de Jong en l'operació de Marcos Alonso i César Azpilicueta. El club blaugrana vol treure un benefici de 80 milions d'euros pel neerlandès i el Chelsea estaria disposat a pagar-ne uns 60, incloent-hi els dos laterals que vol el Barça.
What sort of bizarre take is saying Barca are playing a blinder
Feckin Chelsea, if they keep this up we should definitely sell them Ronaldo to get even.
Would it make sense for Barca to accept that anyway, knowing how dire their situation is? They'd get de Jong's wages off their books and then add more with 2 extra players. Makes no sense, which is why I doubt it.I'm guessing you're referring to this article, right? Here's the relevant passage:
Basically, Chelsea want to involve Frenkie de Jong in the departures of Marcos Alonso and Azpilicueta. Barcelona want to make €80m out of the sale, and Chelsea want to offer €60m + both of the full backs. There's no mention of Barcelona rejecting this in the literal sense, but I can see how this passage can imply that Barcelona want cash only. Someone with a good grasp of Catalan can probably help us out here.
Laurie Whitwell suggests (possibly more opinion) that Barca and United are disagreeing over who pays the outstanding wages.
This is where it's at for me. The inability to sign De Jong is not the issue it's the irresponsibility of not moving on to other targets. Nunez is a good example poor timing and bad prioritisation. This transfer window is already creating the upcoming seasons expectation. The club have lost almost 4 senior players and thus far all that's confirmed is a rotational left back. It's poor to say the least.
It's absolutely obvious that Ten Hag sees Frenkie as crucial to his plans
To be fair, you'd absolutely love him to go to Chelsea, imagine having more reasons to be angry at the club
De Jong is a Barcelona player therefore whatever price Barcelona placed on the player that is their entitlement.
Why is it fecked?That's Erik's 'A' plan 'fecked' then as well... plan 'B' Erik, try for Kante, worth breaking the bank for that lad!...oh but check that he actually wants to play for us first...
Typically, yes, this wouldn't be a good deal for Barcelona, but in this case, Barcelona showed lots of interest in both Marcos Alonso and Azpilicueta. With this deal, they sort out their full back situation, overall, and let go of a player on massive wages.Would it make sense for Barca to accept that anyway, knowing how dire their situation is? They'd get de Jong's wages off their books and then add more with 2 extra players. Makes no sense, which is why I doubt it.
It just makes no sense, not to add the absolute silence from all uk journos regarding the whole thing
They will. I'm sure we'll say no, there will surely be a compromise though.should be a simple case of deducting the money owed to fdj from the transfer fee. Barca will try it on of course
Who said thatWhat sort of bizarre take is saying Barca are playing a blinder
Why not Utd pay the 13 mil for Barca? Then Barca owes Utd the money in installments?
The problem with deferring wages is that if Barca becomes insolvent/bankrupt then banks and vendors have the first right over any cash from asset sales. The players will be left with whatever little is remaining. I can see the following scenario play out if Barca go insolvent:
If I was a young player entering my prime and yet to earn a lot of money, I'd avoid Barca till they were fully sorted.
- Spanish/Catalonia government tries to help Barca but European courts call it unfair state sponsored help. Thanks to Tebas' attacks, City/PSG will be more than happy to sue if direct government involvement takes place.
- There won't be a rapid fire sale of assets (players) as this would make Barca unattractive. Instead Barca will try to follow a German model of part fan ownership. Most buyers who will be interested will be corporations/big business, as wealthy individuals would prefer full control, unlike corporations who'd be more focused on their ability to market products.
- Either ways the new owners will demand zero responsibility for any previous liabilities (including deferred player wages). I can see numerous lawsuits from players/clubs/vendors challenging the fair value/acquisition cost of Barca. If the acquisition cost is too low, players may not get all their deferred wages and clubs owed transfer money may not get all their transfer fees from the stake sale.
- The divestment process will keep dragging on because of this. Barca keeps getting less valuable and post-acquisition I can see them as a Europa-level team for a few years.
This is exactly what people who are owed money by Barca should be worried about, including players. Probably a negotiation tactic by Bayern, but still a one Bayern can legitimately use with Barca and not for example West Ham.My scenario would be a worst case scenario which has a 25% chance of happening … Barca are in a precarious spot where they need to remain successful but at the same time lower wages … I’m not sure how buying established players (Christensen, Lewa, Kessie) will reduce wages even if it gives them success. Revenues will be under pressure beginning next season as they have parted with 15-20% of media revenues for a short term cash injection.
The Lewa quote was literally a joke mate.This is exactly what people who are owed money by Barca should be worried about, including players. Probably a negotiation tactic by Bayern, but still a one Bayern can legitimately use with Barca and not for example West Ham.
Frenkie says he wants to stay at Barca, they are his dream club, although they owe him money and don't want to pay him, yet he still wants to stay. The bright lights of Manchester are not appealing to him...perhaps.Why is it fecked?
I think we're entering week 9 of this 'saga' and are still absolutely nowhere near getting it done
I said weeks ago this needs to be dropped it just isn't happening, we've wasted almost a full summer chasing a player who has publicly stated he doesn't want to leave it's hilarious.
It's okay we'll send the bailiffs round to get him.Frenkie says he wants to stay at Barca, they are his dream club, although they owe him money and don't want to pay him, yet he still wants to stay. The bright lights of Manchester are not appealing to him...perhaps.
FDJ's not coming, United plane leaves for pre-season tour of Thailand tomorrow... oh wait perhaps Frenkie is holidaying in Thailand, so he could join up with us then.
Of course Gerard