fps
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2018
- Messages
- 5,894
Frenkie De Jong
Frenkie De Jong
I'm out of my head can't take it
Frenkie De Jong
I'm out of my head can't take it
56 more pages for the recordHave we broken the Sancho record yet?
Nope, we’re shooting for 1360ishHave we broken the Sancho record yet?
The record shall be broken on Frenkie Friday!!!56 more pages for the record
The record shall be broken on Frenkie Friday!!!
Have you never experienced transfer forum madness before? Welcome to the Caf!Changed my vote. feck you all. You're all liars.
Demand a fecking bleep test for all these absolute twats who have above 1000 posts in this here thread. Get off your arse and get fresh air.
Who's Joan ?
Who's Joan ?
Huge conjecture on this. How is that journalism?
Huge conjecture on this. How is that journalism?
When he finds a new thread to call people liars in. Might I suggest the BoJo threadWhen will this pain end!?
Huge conjecture on this. How is that journalism?
Have we been chasing Frenkie THAT long?!!of Arc
Huge conjecture on this. How is that journalism?
Chelsea has now a net spend of 156 million. How deep is their pockets if they want to spend another 75 on De Jong?
New owner. He’s running around the yard yapping at everythingChelsea has now a net spend of 156 million. How deep is their pockets if they want to spend another 75 on De Jong?
Don't they also want Fofana too? Don't forget the need for a striker as well... looking at a net spend of way over £250m to £300mChelsea has now a net spend of 156 million. How deep is their pockets if they want to spend another 75 on De Jong?
Quite. The logical viewpoint is even they’ve got a budget and with the money they’re about to spend on Fofana they’re already at well over 200m net with at least one attacker still to go and a RWB. Another 85m on top of that with the deferred wages? Seems a bit of a stretch to me.If Chelsea are prepared to spend 62m on a position they desperately need, imagine the hundred million they’d spend on a position they are stacked.
Are you only just coming to that realisation?!Glazers need to sell. They aren’t good at this.
Haven't they also added a couple of other midfielders too? Granted they're young and for the future, but still... just how stacked do they want to be in MF??Quite. The logical viewpoint is even they’ve got a budget and with the money they’re about to spend on Fofana they’re already at well over 200m net with at least one attacker still to go and a RWB. Another 85m on top of that with the deferred wages? Seems a bit of a stretch to me.
Huge conjecture on this. How is that journalism?
It's took you how long to realise this?Glazers need to sell. They aren’t good at this.
If Chelsea are prepared to spend 62m on a position they desperately need, imagine the hundred million they’d spend on a position they are stacked.
When he finds a new thread to call people liars in. Might I suggest the BoJo thread
Quite. The logical viewpoint is even they’ve got a budget and with the money they’re about to spend on Fofana they’re already at well over 200m net with at least one attacker still to go and a RWB. Another 85m on top of that with the deferred wages? Seems a bit of a stretch to me.
Oh yes, it’s marked on my calendar too!I am already looking forward to the 2023 Jude Bellingham Transfer Thread.
I mean, sure. But what does that have to do with this? What were they supposed to do, pay his wages that barca owe him? What precedent does that set? Or magically convince him that we’re in the CL and his GF that Manchester is as good as barcelona? Come on.Glazers need to sell. They aren’t good at this.
Ducker is a useless..
I think he’s odds on to go to Liverpool. Just a feelingOh yes, it’s marked on my calendar too!
I think he's saying they'll offer 100m in one swoop to cover the wages and the fee. If that was the case, why are they refusing to meet Barcas €80m fixed?United have already agreed a fee?
Unless he’s suggesting Chelsea will pay more to the player?
Strange report and unsure of the relevance