The positive thing of the latest news is that if Chelsea agree a deal with Barcelona we will have a clear picture of what was going on all this time.
a) FDJ stays in Barcelona with the current contract --> The deferred wages scenario was the most likely obstacle and the player would probably move somewhere if he received the deferred amount.
b) FDJ stays in Barcelona with a wage cut --> The player intended to go nowhere and his ambition is questionable since he is willing to risk his career and his prime years when he is not a guaranteed starter and the play him out of his best position.
c) FDJ ends up in Manchester United --> He wanted to be here and indeed something (deferred wages) was apparently delaying the transfer. No one can say that he was forced to come here and we will have a new Di Maria, if he rejected Chelsea in the meantime.
d) FDJ ends up in Chelsea --> Apart from the obvious meltdown, questions need to be raised to all of the participants of this fiasco (even to ETH) since this means that we never had reassurances from the player's side, or they were dragging us along.
Questions need to be raised for (b) as well since we lost so much time, but compared to (d) scenario it is nothing.
a) FDJ stays in Barcelona with the current contract --> The deferred wages scenario was the most likely obstacle and the player would probably move somewhere if he received the deferred amount.
b) FDJ stays in Barcelona with a wage cut --> The player intended to go nowhere and his ambition is questionable since he is willing to risk his career and his prime years when he is not a guaranteed starter and the play him out of his best position.
c) FDJ ends up in Manchester United --> He wanted to be here and indeed something (deferred wages) was apparently delaying the transfer. No one can say that he was forced to come here and we will have a new Di Maria, if he rejected Chelsea in the meantime.
d) FDJ ends up in Chelsea --> Apart from the obvious meltdown, questions need to be raised to all of the participants of this fiasco (even to ETH) since this means that we never had reassurances from the player's side, or they were dragging us along.
Questions need to be raised for (b) as well since we lost so much time, but compared to (d) scenario it is nothing.