I've seen him 5 or 6 times, and I came to this conclusion every single time.
That's at least the standard excuse one keeps hearing. "He sucks as a 8, but he's a world beater when put on the 6, I swear".
Definitely not a 60-80m +400k/wk risk I'd be willing to take...
This is a very shallow representation of the truth right, I dont think anyone is saying that, or at least not without nuance..
The thing is, he can play as a 4, 6 or 8 it doesn't mean anything. Those numbers dont mean anything. Pirlo was a 6, but so was Nigel de Jong.. So what does 6 mean? Pogba played as an 8 for France but so did Mark van Bommel for the NL? People making statements based on 6 or 8 are just making lazy statements which dont mean shit.
Frenkie played his best football for Ajax and NL in a double pivot.. For Ajax alongside Lasse Schone who is also a holding midfielder with more technical/passing creative qualities than defensive ones. For NL alongside Marten De Roon who is an oldscool defensive midfielder with more defensive than creative qualities. The common denominator in those sides was that Frenkie was the one who controlled build up from behind and was the main playmaker from behind (deeplying playmaker if you will). Thát is what he is good at in general, and what he is worldclass at when players/teams try to put him under pressure. On the ball he is one of the most press resistant players in the world. Neither for Ajax, nor for NL it was expected of him to stay away from the ball during build up more often than not, to make runs in the opponents box, to provide goals and assists.
And that is exactly what is happening now at Barca. Busquets is their main playmaker from behind and the first one to always get the ball in build up. Frenkie is expected (Both Koeman and Xavi have expressed this at mulitple occassions) to become a more complete midfielder and learn to stay away from the ball, make runs in the opponents box and provide goals and assists. All fair if coaches want to try and develop him into that kind of midfielder, but I personally think its bullshit and a load of crap. Because you are asking him to play in a way he has never shown any réal talent for (he was never a goalscorer or box-to-box player), and you are refusing/denying him to do what he does best... And that's basically whats already been going on now at Barca for almost 2 years, and in those 2 years I don't think he convinced anyone he ís developing into a great box-to-box goalscoring/assistproviding midfielder..
So indeed.. When I look at Frenkie at Barca, I also 9/10 times see a player who just fades into the game, plays a 6 or 6.5 more often than anything else, underwhelming indeed... In that role he is indeed mediocre (based on top-level criteria) and I would never spend that much cash on him if you intend to use him as such.
However, if you intend to play him in a way used at Ajax and NL - regardless of putting the 6 or 8 stamp on it - meaning to use him as the main man in your build up from behind and as main deeplying playmaker, I still believe there is an absolute gem of a worldclass player there and any top club in need of such a player would be a fool not to pick him up if they have the chance.
In my opinion only PSG (Verrati) and Chelsea (Kovacic) don't need him right now..