Not talking about giving it up. Lump sum vs installments.
Do we know if there is a realistic way to resolve this 17 million problem?
I mean, if Barca pays the 17 million now, then this will count towards their wage limit for next year, right? So, perhaps for accounting reasons it is impossible for them to do this, even if they wanted to.
On the other hand, if Man Utd accepts to pay an extra 17 million as wages, then they will want to spread this to multiple years --- basically Frenkie will have an elevated salary for the next few years. But he already has this, so why move? Plus this will mess up the wage structure for Man Utd.
Of course it is ideal. Yet it doesn’t mean, that their problems wouldn’t be partially solved via sale of, let’s say, Pedri, Fati or Gavi. They may be unwilling to sell those, but it’s entirely different matterFrenkie is ideal because a willing buyer is lined up for a very good fee.
So they can just scam him?No, they won’t.
He also said he’s gone from 60% likely to 50/50 and that he doesn’t think De Jong wants to sign for UnitedThat's bit more positive Andy
It is a legal issue, was explained a few weeks ago. United cant cover that apparentlyThere's many ways to resolve this issue. Barcelona could lower the transfer price and United would give the money as a signing bonus to De Jong. What it comes down to in this situation is the fact that nobody wants to pay these 17M. It's not a legal issue, it's a money issue.
It’s possibly also a tax issue.It is a legal issue, was explained a few weeks ago. United cant cover that apparently
It absolutely is. I think Utd giving it to Barca in the fee also causes them problems as they have to announce it in their wage budget, so would screw wage cap ffp too. Might have made that up but it’s definitely a tricky thing to get around.It’s possibly also a tax issue.
No it’s not. He is owed over €20m a year for the next 4 years because he agreed to earn less in 20-22. If he doesn’t play at Barca in 22-26 they won’t pay him anything.That’s why he’s not moving until they do. Pretty simple really.
He agreed to deferred €17m of his salary from 2020-22 to 2022-26. He signed the contract. They cannot pay him his salary of the next 4 years in advance.So they can just scam him?
It absolutely is. I think Utd giving it to Barca in the fee also causes them problems as they have to announce it in their wage budget, so would screw wage cap ffp too. Might have made that up but it’s definitely a tricky thing to get around.
The page number
I don’t think Barca can practically pay him €17m now anyway unless they amend his contract.
But they are asking him to leave. How can you ask someone to defer wages to the future and then ask them to leave and give up that money the next year.He agreed to deferred €17m of his salary from 2020-22 to 2022-26. He signed the contract. They cannot pay him his salary of the next 4 years in advance.
They kick into gear this season and run till the end of his contract.I think you miss understood. His deferred payments kick into gear in a couple of years - he will wait till then and then leave
Is it really in any doubt that they want to sell him? Is it really in any doubt that they can’t possibly afford to pay him the salary he will be due in his contract going forward?They don’t owe him anything. He signed a contract that deferred his wages to 2022-26. He got all the money they were supposed to pay him per his contract until now.
They (might) want to sell him, he doesn’t want to go because 1) he would rather play for Barca, 2) he will get paid better over there for the next 5 years than he would have been anywhere else.
It is a legal issue, was explained a few weeks ago. United cant cover that apparently
It's not a serious upgrade, swapping FDJ for Jorginho would be a marginal improvement to your team. You lack goals and defenders, Frenkie is neither of those things.FDJ would be a serious upgrade on Jorginho (who incidentaly has only a year left on his contract and may move back to Italy) , so I disagree that he wouldn't improve us at all. The reason Chelsea have been concentrating their transfer business on defenders has to do with us losing two centrebacks and two fullbacks and the need to replace them.
I'm sure if Tuchel was offered a chance to sign FDJ, he'd do it in a heartbeat.
The crux of it though is that we know he isn’t owed the money legally, however it’s also true that legally he has a contract with them. Barca fabs and press conveniently forget his current contract, hence why it’s never mentioned.He agreed to deferred €17m of his salary from 2020-22 to 2022-26. He signed the contract. They cannot pay him his salary of the next 4 years in advance.
Chelsea want to upgrade on Kante and Jorginho, while we need to upgrade on McFred. Difference in marginal improvement is hugeIt's not a serious upgrade, swapping FDJ for Jorginho would be a marginal improvement to your team. You lack goals and defenders, Frenkie is neither of those things.
It’s you that misunderstood, it kicks in this season. That’s the whole reason his wage is so huge, and why they want to get rid of him.I think you miss understood. His deferred payments kick into gear in a couple of years - he will wait till then and then leave
I don’t think he said that. He said he hasn’t got any evidence that FDJ does want to join Utd which just means he has no idea either way.He also said he’s gone from 60% likely to 50/50 and that he doesn’t think De Jong wants to sign for United
Considering he's connected to United and Barca, that's not exactly great news though, let's be real hereI don’t think he said that. He said he hasn’t got any evidence that FDJ does want to join Utd which just means he has no idea either way.
The crux of it though is that we know he isn’t owed the money legally, however it’s also true that legally he has a contract with them. Barca fabs and press conveniently forget his current contract, hence why it’s never mentioned.
if they want him to leave he can ask for a severance package. If he says I want 17m that’s his price. Of course barca can say no, in which case he can just stay on his legally binding contract. That is his leverage right now
or barca can try to force him to sign a new contract where he gives up his deferred wages, and he goes to half his current
He kind of did though. He said he doesn’t think he has a desire to sign for United and thinks he’d rather live in London if given the choiceI don’t think he said that. He said he hasn’t got any evidence that FDJ does want to join Utd which just means he has no idea either way.
He also said he’s gone from 60% likely to 50/50 and that he doesn’t think De Jong wants to sign for United
That's his usual MO though, isn't it?Just listened to this and it struck me Andy was talking as a pessimistic United fan rather than reporting absolute facts.
Of course they can, Danny Murphy confirmed it the other day, a football with time left on his deal always “settles” with his current club first. That’s why top teams aren’t full of players just sitting on contracts playing in the reserves.
A club and a player always has to agree to a severance package. This entire fecking deal is held up because they cannot agree on that severance package.
It is, hence whilst he is absolutely a reliable source it’s not a tweet to hang you hat on. This is still on.That's his usual MO though, isn't it?
Mitten usually has decent club sources but it's obvious he's got nothing on this besides the club stance of not giving up yet
To be a bit more accurate they agree on a mutual termination which can include a severance package but isn't necessarily the case.
has eth said anything about eriksen playing as a 10. I havent seen the latest interviews though