What about -- when fit of course -- the best LB in the prem?
You are not wrong but that means we need to create a space and no one is taking Shaw or Malacia off our hands.Mazraoui was bought to replace AWB. We’ve only got 3 fit FB’s including Amass. A specialist LB would be useful if we can afford one.
If it's a choice, I'd rather we played Dalot/Mazraoui there and signed two central midfield players.
A guy at work says it twice after anything you say to him.The death of the word ‘literally’ in the English language is a travesty
I'd rather see us buy a DM and a LB tbh. Ugarte is a work rate beast, Casemiro can handle a game per week and I have a good feeling with Collyer. We can't afford another season without a LB
It’s infuriatingA guy at work says it twice after anything you say to him.
"yeah... literally, literally"
We aren't spending 40M on a left back when we still have to strengthen the midfield. This won't happen.
We will if PSG agree to a swap with Sancho.Sounds like nonsense anyway, this rumour. Maybe Fenerbache just want more upfront money from Brighton.
You mean playing Casemiro and Urgate together? If so, fine. I don't want Mainoo to play 50+ games this season and burn out, though. Even if we buy Ugarte, I'd still like an additional option for the two deep midfield slots, personally (I appreciate that probably neither a left back nor an additional midfielder are very realistic if we buy Ugarte, though).
I think we’ll go for Hermoso as cover for two positions, as soon as Lindelof is soldAs much as I would like this to happen, I don’t think there’s any veracity to this. We already have two right footers who can play left back in Mazraoui and Dalot, and while I think we need more coverage there, I would imagine we’ll prioritise a left footer and a cheap deal like a loan. Resources will be directed to midfield.
The one variable we don’t know is how exits are shaping up. If Lindelof, McTominay, Eriksen, Hannibal, Pellistri and Sancho all, or most, leave there would be plenty in the budget for Kadioglu, Ugarte and a lower cost midfield signing like Fofana or Rabiot on a free. But that’s a lot of movement in two weeks, and I’ll think we’ll focus on securing our primary midfield target first.
Couple we perhaps also see this guy as a midfielder too? He can play alot of positions and might be useful for us at full back, midfield and maybe even the right wing?
Also the numbers being bandied about seems extremely unlikely. We don't want to pay £50m for Ugarte, but we're going to pay £40m on Kadioglu? Seems very unlikely.As much as I would like this to happen, I don’t think there’s any veracity to this. We already have two right footers who can play left back in Mazraoui and Dalot, and while I think we need more coverage there, I would imagine we’ll prioritise a left footer and a cheap deal like a loan. Resources will be directed to midfield.
The one variable we don’t know is how exits are shaping up. If Lindelof, McTominay, Eriksen, Hannibal, Pellistri and Sancho all, or most, leave there would be plenty in the budget for Kadioglu, Ugarte and a lower cost midfield signing like Fofana or Rabiot on a free. But that’s a lot of movement in two weeks, and I’ll think we’ll focus on securing our primary midfield target first.
I think it’s insane that people factor Malacia into anything. Guy wasn’t at a level where he could afford to lose a big part of his athleticism and hadn’t even established himself as rock solid in the PL yet. The poor guy will be lucky to be of the required standard once back, let alone any dependable feature in the fullback rotation.
Even if he does get back, he’ll need months to get his confidence and belief in his body, which should not be rushed. We absolutely need another LB.
Also the numbers being bandied about seems extremely unlikely. We don't want to pay £50m for Ugarte, but we're going to pay £40m on Kadioglu? Seems very unlikely.
We aren’t blessed with many back up options at fullback. We’ve lost Wan Bissaka, Kwambala, Amrabaat, potentially Lindelof too, who all played there last season.
Or the use of it is literally a travesty and the death of it is metaphorically a tragedy?The death of the word ‘literally’ in the English language is a travesty
You never know, we managed to hijack Zirkzee and Yoro transfers so there's a chance.That's why I thought we would go for him but agree the cost has probably played a big part in it
The problem is what is a fit Luke Shaw? Does he even exist? He's got injured so many times that you can easily consider his bad patches as 'still recovering from injury', 'he's still coming to terms to tempo of regular football' or 'he is probably playing through the pain barrier'. Thus the temptation to just focus on the good games is high which tend to screw any assessment about him up.
A WC player gives a 7/10 performance on a regular basis, week in week out, season in season out. As they say form is temporary but class is permanent. There's nothing permanent with Luke Shaw apart from his injuries
You never know, we managed to hijack Zirkzee and Yoro transfers so there's a chance.
Shaw needs to be phased awayAll fair points. But Shaw is not going to another club, not this season at least. Say it’s now February and Shaw is fit and looking great in competition, and we somehow find ourselves in the top four hunt and deep in all cups. Do we not go with Shaw to put the next possible XI on the pitch in those cup finals?
Certainly sounds like most of our defenders medical conditions in the last year.Martinez, Amass, one of Mazraoui / Dalot and Shaw if he ever becomes fit. The situation is pretty dire but I think we can hobble along. If it was only one of DM / LB, I'd rather do DM.
Why have you done thisOr the use of it is literally a travesty and the death of it is metaphorically a tragedy?
I think we’ll go for Hermoso as cover for two positions, as soon as Lindelof is sold
Ain't happening.I think we’ll go for Hermoso as cover for two positions, as soon as Lindelof is sold
Why have you done this
Just a travesty.Or the use of it is literally a travesty and the death of it is metaphorically a tragedy?
Why ignore the money made from sales?Ah back before we committed to spending over £141 million on players already
Who did we hijack big Z from?You never know, we managed to hijack Zirkzee and Yoro transfers so there's a chance.
Why ignore the money made from sales?
AC Milan.Who did we hijack big Z from?
At the moment we're on a net spend of around £75m.Because its minimal compared to other clubs who have spent more than us to this point like Chelsea or Aston Villa and if we were to spend £30 million+ on a fullback we'd be spending the same as them with much less in sales. And thats before spending on Ugarte and selling McTominay for example for less. Our net spend is high already
Good questionWhy have you done this
At the moment we're on a net spend of around £75m.
We normally spend around £200m on transfers. I think we've got enough for another fullback and two midfielders. That's not factoring in potential further sales.
See what happens in the next 2 weeks.